RESEARCH PAPER ASSIGNMENT Legal And Ethics
Rubric Detail
A rubric lists evaluation criteria that instructors use to evaluate learner work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.
Content
Name: RESEARCH PAPER ASSIGNMENT GRADING RUBRIC
Description: NUR 3826 — Research Paper Assignment Grading Rubric Prof. Curbelo Your paper should be between 4-5 pages long, not including your cover and reference page, doubled spaced. A minimum of three PEER REVIEWED ARTICLES OR JOURNALS are required. APA 6th EDITION FORMAT WILL BE STRICTLY ENFORCED. The research paper will be graded on quality of research to support the topic, effective use of information gained through research, credibility of sources, content, grammar and mechanics, and bibliography.
| Exceeds expectations | Meets Expectations | Does not meet expectations | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality | Points: 45 (45.00%) Cited 3 or more sources. Sources reliable, properly cited. Ideas well organized All information included. Sufficient information provided to support all elements of topic. Feedback: | Points: 33.75 (33.75%) Cited 2-1 sources Sources mostly reliable. Minor errors. Adequate discussion of ideas included Clear organization of main points. Feedback: | Points: 22.5 (22.50%) Failed to cite any sources. Sources unreliable. Information interferes with ability of reader to understand paper. Information does not support the topic. Feedback: |
| Content | Points: 35 (35.00%) Research Topic includes all aspects of the project, appropriate length of paper and topic. Content relevant to purpose of paper Contains clear and appropriate organization, with effective transitions, introduction, and conclusion. Feedback: | Points: 26.25 (26.25%) Topic includes most aspects of the project, of appropriate breadth for length of paper & an appropriate topic for research. Contains somewhat clear and concise abstract and resources page. Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion lacking clarity and/or appropriateness. Feedback: | Points: 17.5 (17.50%) Topic unclear and includes no aspects of the project, of inappropriate length of paper. Missing abstract and resources page. No organization, transitions, introduction, and poor conclusion. Feedback: |
| Grammar | Points: 10 (10.00%) Consistent and appropriate writing style, there are no grammatical spelling errors. Appropriate punctuation used. Met min/max page requirements Feedback: | Points: 7.5 (7.50%) Fewer than 2 punctuation, or capitalization error Adequate sentence structure. Met min/max page requirements Feedback: | Points: 5 (5.00%) Topic inconsistent. More than 5 spelling errors, pronouns/antecedents, tense, punctuation and capitalization. Does not meet style and/or min/max page requirements Feedback: |
| APA | Points: 10 (10.00%) All sources properly cited. References used appropriately in paper, no errors in references, correct use of APA style references. Presence of in-text citations or quotations that supports the student statements within the paper. Peer reviewed journals within past 5 years. Feedback: | Points: 7.5 (7.50%) All sources properly cited.References used appropriately but limited. Very few errors in format or punctuation. Average evidence with peer reviewed journals within 5 years. Feedback: | Points: 5 (5.00%) Not all sources properly cited. Errors in reference, errors in APA style for reference. format or punctuation make ideas unclear. Feedback: |
Show Descriptions Show Feedback
Quality–
Levels of Achievement: Exceeds expectations 45 (45.00%) points Cited 3 or more sources. Sources reliable, properly cited. Ideas well organized All information included. Sufficient information provided to support all elements of topic. Meets Expectations 33.75 (33.75%) points Cited 2-1 sources Sources mostly reliable. Minor errors. Adequate discussion of ideas included Clear organization of main points. Does not meet expectations 22.5 (22.50%) points Failed to cite any sources. Sources unreliable. Information interferes with ability of reader to understand paper. Information does not support the topic. Feedback:
Content–
Levels of Achievement: Exceeds expectations 35 (35.00%) points Research Topic includes all aspects of the project, appropriate length of paper and topic. Content relevant to purpose of paper Contains clear and appropriate organization, with effective transitions, introduction, and conclusion. Meets Expectations 26.25 (26.25%) points Topic includes most aspects of the project, of appropriate breadth for length of paper & an appropriate topic for research. Contains somewhat clear and concise abstract and resources page. Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion lacking clarity and/or appropriateness. Does not meet expectations 17.5 (17.50%) points Topic unclear and includes no aspects of the project, of inappropriate length of paper. Missing abstract and resources page. No organization, transitions, introduction, and poor conclusion. Feedback:
Grammar–
Levels of Achievement: Exceeds expectations 10 (10.00%) points Consistent and appropriate writing style, there are no grammatical spelling errors. Appropriate punctuation used. Met min/max page requirements Meets Expectations 7.5 (7.50%) points Fewer than 2 punctuation, or capitalization error Adequate sentence structure. Met min/max page requirements Does not meet expectations 5 (5.00%) points Topic inconsistent. More than 5 spelling errors, pronouns/antecedents, tense, punctuation and capitalization. Does not meet style and/or min/max page requirements Feedback:
APA–
Levels of Achievement: Exceeds expectations 10 (10.00%) points All sources properly cited. References used appropriately in paper, no errors in references, correct use of APA style references. Presence of in-text citations or quotations that supports the student statements within the paper. Peer reviewed journals within past 5 years. Meets Expectations 7.5 (7.50%) points All sources properly cited.References used appropriately but limited. Very few errors in format or punctuation. Average evidence with peer reviewed journals within 5 years. Does not meet expectations 5 (5.00%) points Not all sources properly cited. Errors in reference, errors in APA style for reference. format or punctuation make ideas unclear. Feedback:
Name:RESEARCH PAPER ASSIGNMENT GRADING RUBRIC
Description:NUR 3826 — Research Paper Assignment Grading Rubric Prof. Curbelo Your paper should be between 4-5 pages long, not including your cover and reference page, doubled spaced. A minimum of three PEER REVIEWED ARTICLES OR JOURNALS are required. APA 6th EDITION FORMAT WILL BE STRICTLY ENFORCED. The research paper will be graded on quality of research to support the topic, effective use of information gained through research, credibility of sources, content, grammar and mechanics, and bibliography.
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
