PY0791 Historical Psychology and Qualitative Research Methods: Empirical Evidenc

70-100 Distinction

60-69 Commendation

50-59 Pass

40-49 Marginal Fail

0-39 Clear Fail

Excellent coverage of all aspects of question

Commendable coverage of almost all aspects of question

Satisfactory coverage of most aspects of question

Fails to address some major aspects of the question

Fails to address many major aspects of the question

Evidence of extensive independent reading, in addition to guided readings

Evidence of independent reading, in addition to guided readings

Reliance on guided readings

Limited coverage of relevant material

Poor coverage of relevant material

Shows an excellent sense of the timeline and significance of work produced during this period

Shows a good sense of the timeline and significance of work produced during this period

Shows a reasonable sense of the timeline and significance of work produced during this period

Shows a limited sense of the timeline and significance of work produced during this period

Shows little or no sense of the timeline and significance of work produced during this period

All the material is directly relevant for topic and audience

Nearly all of the material is directly relevant for topic and audience

Almost all the material is relevant for topic and audience

Some of the material is not relevant for topic and audience

Much of the material is not relevant for topic and audience

All points are expressed clearly, grammatically and eloquently

Nearly all points are expressed clearly and grammatically

Most points are expressed clearly and grammatically

There are lapses in clarity and grammar

The meaning is difficult to follow

Excellent  attempt to write / present for academic audience

Good  attempt to write / present for academic audience

Some  attempt to write / present for academic  audience

Limited attempt to write / present for academic audience

No attempt to write / present for academic audience

All material is well organised and the argument is really well structured

Nearly all of the material is wll organised and the argument shows good structure

Some of the material is not  well organised and the argument is reasonably structured

Much of the material is not well organised and the argument is not well structured

The organisation of the material is poor and  the argument is poorly structured

Shows excellent appreciation of the strengths and weaknesses of theories, methodologies and empirical evidence

Shows good appreciation of the strengths and weaknesses of theories, methodologies and empirical evidence

Shows some appreciation of the strengths and weaknesses of theories, methodologies and empirical evidence

There are a number of lapses in meaningful evaluation

There is an absence of meaningful evaluation

Shows outstandingly original contribution, presenting own interpretations, integration of materials and/or integration of materials

Shows original contribution,  presenting own interpretations , integration of materials and/or integration of materials

Shows some original contribution, presenting own interpretations and/or integration of materials

Shows little original contribution and integration of materials

There is an absence of original contribution

All the material is accurate

Nearly all of the material is accurate

There are some minor factual errors

There are a number of factual errors

There are many major factual errors