Hilary Mulligan Typologies Essay Beautiful Boy

Hilary Mulligan Typologies Essay Beautiful Boy
Word count:minimum 1200 words max 2000 words (can go over a bit) not including
references and bibliography.
Marks:50-60 points worth 70% of final grade.
Referencing
APA 7.
Research:1-3
academic first year level sources
The essay will need each of these components, synopsis as the introduction, typologies/
justification (the typology is pure political) please put this in the first body paragraph , topic dev
in the second body paragraph and a conclusion in the third body paragraph. Please follow the
Haas et al film typology of pure political films.
Haas et al. claim that all films are political. If their assertion holds true, then we should be able
to find and analyze political messages in any type of a film no matter: genre, style,
director,medium (streaming tv, anime, special effects driven, feature films, episodic etc….). This
essay assignment puts Haas et al.’s assertion to the test!
Hollywood tends to treat drug use in films as comedic moments or glamorize and downplay the
seriousness of drug use and addiction
in films For example: See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jP5e2XJsB_4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uOmtVFQ3WF8) Analyze how the film Beautiful Boy
opposes such depictions,taking on a more realistic
and educational view of the issue, by foregrounding more realistically,
Such risk factors as: mental illness, the hard reality of drug addiction on families and those
addicted, as well as debunking common beliefs/stereotypes that drug addiction is a moral failing
or a matter of choice. Research Articles:
See:
https://www.drugabuse.gov/publications/drugfacts/understanding-drug-use-addiction
See:
Interview with David Sheff
https://www.minnpost.com/mental-health-addiction/2014/01/beloved-son-fuels-hisfathers-quest-understand-addiction-and-recover/
Ryerson POLICY 60: Definition of academic misconduct :3.1. Academic Misconduct Any
behavior that undermines the university’s ability to evaluate students’ academic achievements,
or any behavior that a student knew, or reasonably ought to have known, could gain them or
others unearned academic advantage or benefit, counts as academic misconduct. Included in
academic misconduct are: Plagiarism, including self-plagiarism; contract cheating; cheating;
misrepresentation of personal identity or performance; submission of false information;
contributing to academic misconduct; damaging, tampering, or interfering with the scholarly
environment; unauthorized use of intellectual property; misconduct in re-graded/re-submitted
work. While this list characterizes the most common instances of academic misconduct, it is not
intended Pol 60: Academic Integrity 3 to be exhaustive. A more comprehensive list of inclusions
can be found in Appendix A.