Question:
During a family health assessment, what is the age-appropriate screening recommendation for each family member between 18- 80-years and what health model plan can be used to discuss reasons why this model is the best for the family. Using this model, what are the steps you can use to achieve family-centered health promotion. include strategies for communication
A rubric lists evaluation criteria that instructors use to evaluate learner work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.
| Exceeds expectations | Meets Expectations | Does not meet expectations | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality | Points: 45 (45.00%) Cited 3 or more sources. Sources reliable, properly cited. Ideas well organized All information included. Sufficient information provided to support all elements of topic. Feedback: | Points: 33.75 (33.75%) Cited 2-1 sources Sources mostly reliable. Minor errors. Adequate discussion of ideas included Clear organization of main points. Feedback: | Points: 22.5 (22.50%) Failed to cite any sources. Sources unreliable. Information interferes with ability of reader to understand paper. Information does not support the topic. Feedback: |
| Content | Points: 35 (35.00%) Research Topic includes all aspects of the project, appropriate length of paper and topic. Content relevant to purpose of paper Contains clear and appropriate organization, with effective transitions, introduction, and conclusion. Feedback: | Points: 26.25 (26.25%) Topic includes most aspects of the project, of appropriate breadth for length of paper & an appropriate topic for research. Contains somewhat clear and concise abstract and resources page. Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion lacking clarity and/or appropriateness. Feedback: | Points: 17.5 (17.50%) Topic unclear and includes no aspects of the project, of inappropriate length of paper. Missing abstract and resources page. No organization, transitions, introduction, and poor conclusion. Feedback: |
| Grammar | Points: 10 (10.00%) Consistent and appropriate writing style, there are no grammatical spelling errors. Appropriate punctuation used. Met min/max page requirements Feedback: | Points: 7.5 (7.50%) Fewer than 2 punctuation, or capitalization error Adequate sentence structure. Met min/max page requirements Feedback: | Points: 5 (5.00%) Topic inconsistent. More than 5 spelling errors, pronouns/antecedents, tense, punctuation and capitalization. Does not meet style and/or min/max page requirements Feedback: |
| APA | Points: 10 (10.00%) All sources properly cited. References used appropriately in paper, no errors in references, correct use of APA style references. Presence of in-text citations or quotations that supports the student statements within the paper. Peer reviewed journals within past 5 years. Feedback: | Points: 7.5 (7.50%) All sources properly cited.References used appropriately but limited. Very few errors in format or punctuation. Average evidence with peer reviewed journals within 5 years. Feedback: | Points: 5 (5.00%) Not all sources properly cited. Errors in reference, errors in APA style for reference. format or punctuation make ideas unclear. Feedback: |
Show Descriptions Show Feedback
Levels of Achievement: Exceeds expectations 45 (45.00%) points Cited 3 or more sources. Sources reliable, properly cited. Ideas well organized All information included. Sufficient information provided to support all elements of topic. Meets Expectations 33.75 (33.75%) points Cited 2-1 sources Sources mostly reliable. Minor errors. Adequate discussion of ideas included Clear organization of main points. Does not meet expectations 22.5 (22.50%) points Failed to cite any sources. Sources unreliable. Information interferes with ability of reader to understand paper. Information does not support the topic. Feedback:
Levels of Achievement: Exceeds expectations 35 (35.00%) points Research Topic includes all aspects of the project, appropriate length of paper and topic. Content relevant to purpose of paper Contains clear and appropriate organization, with effective transitions, introduction, and conclusion. Meets Expectations 26.25 (26.25%) points Topic includes most aspects of the project, of appropriate breadth for length of paper & an appropriate topic for research. Contains somewhat clear and concise abstract and resources page. Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion lacking clarity and/or appropriateness. Does not meet expectations 17.5 (17.50%) points Topic unclear and includes no aspects of the project, of inappropriate length of paper. Missing abstract and resources page. No organization, transitions, introduction, and poor conclusion. Feedback:
Levels of Achievement: Exceeds expectations 10 (10.00%) points Consistent and appropriate writing style, there are no grammatical spelling errors. Appropriate punctuation used. Met min/max page requirements Meets Expectations 7.5 (7.50%) points Fewer than 2 punctuation, or capitalization error Adequate sentence structure. Met min/max page requirements Does not meet expectations 5 (5.00%) points Topic inconsistent. More than 5 spelling errors, pronouns/antecedents, tense, punctuation and capitalization. Does not meet style and/or min/max page requirements Feedback:
Levels of Achievement: Exceeds expectations 10 (10.00%) points All sources properly cited. References used appropriately in paper, no errors in references, correct use of APA style references. Presence of in-text citations or quotations that supports the student statements within the paper. Peer reviewed journals within past 5 years. Meets Expectations 7.5 (7.50%) points All sources properly cited.References used appropriately but limited. Very few errors in format or punctuation. Average evidence with peer reviewed journals within 5 years. Does not meet expectations 5 (5.00%) points Not all sources properly cited. Errors in reference, errors in APA style for reference. format or punctuation make ideas unclear. Feedback:
Blog ArchiveCopyright © 2019 HomeworkMarket.com Read More
RESEARCH PAPER ASSIGNMENT
Name: Circumcision…Is it an issue?
Explore the human and ethical issues surrounding circumcision.
1- Is this a medical right or a human rights issue?
2-Why are people so against it…why are some so for it?
3-What is the role of the nurse in relations to an ethical dilemma involving circumcision?
Requirements:
Your paper should be:
1. Words Minimum 1500-1800 words not including your cover , reference page , Introduction and conclusion which has to be in separated pages.
2. Doubled spaced.
3. 4. Include a minimum of three nursing REVIEWED ARTICLES OR JOURNALS are required.
5. APA 6th EDITION FORMAT WILL BE STRICTLY ENFORCED.
6. The research paper will be graded on quality of research to support the topic, effective use of information gained through research, credibility of sources, content, grammar and mechanics, and bibliography.
Top of Form
Bottom of Form
Research Paper – Circumcision–An issue?
Circumcision…Is it an issue? Explore the human and ethical issues surrounding circumcision. Is this a medical right or a human rights issue? Why are people so against it…why are some so for it? What is the role of the nurse in relations to an ethical dilemma involving circumcision?
Requirements:
Word Count—Minimum 1500-1800 words
References—Minimum 3 peer reviewed references, the oldest being no more than 5 years old.
*********APA FORMAT IS REQUIRED **************
PLEASE ATTACH PROOF OF PLAGIARISM, TURNITIN
Thanks.
Write a paper of 800-900 words examining your personal values and beliefs. Include the following:
********** INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT***********
Circumcision…Is it an issue? Explore the human and ethical issues surrounding circumcision. Is this a medical right or a human rights issue? Why are people so against it…why are some so for it? What is the role of the nurse in relations to an ethical dilemma involving circumcision?
Requirements:
Word Count—Minimum 1800 words
References—Minimum 3 peer reviewed references, the oldest being no more than 5 years old.
*********APA FORMAT IS REQUIRED **************Prove in turnitin
The needs of the pediatric patient differ depending on age, as do the stages of development and the expected assessment findings for each stage. In a 500-750-word paper, examine the needs of a school-aged child between the ages of 5 and 12 years old and discuss the following:
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.
Turn it in Score must be less than 20% or will not be accepted for credit, must be your own work and in your own words. You can resubmit, Final submission will be accepted if less than 20%. Copy paste from websites or textbooks will not be accepted or tolerated. Please see College Handbook with reference to Academic Misconduct Statement
Soap Note 2 Chronic Conditions
Soap Note 2 Chronic Conditions (15 Points)
Pick any Chronic Disease from Weeks 6-10
Soap notes will be uploaded to Moodle and put through TURN-It-In (anti-Plagiarism program)
Late Assignment Policy
Assignments turned in late will have 1 point taken off for every day assignment is late, after 7 days assignment will get grade of 0. No exceptions
Follow the MRU Soap Note Rubric as a guide:
Grading Rubric
Student______________________________________
This sheet is to help you understand what we are looking for, and what our margin remarks might be about on your write ups of patients. Since at all of the white-ups that you hand in are uniform, this represents what MUST be included in every write-up.
1) Identifying Data (___5pts): The opening list of the note. It contains age, sex, race, marital status, etc. The patient complaint should be given in quotes. If the patient has more than one complaint, each complaint should be listed separately (1, 2, etc.) and each addressed in the subjective and under the appropriate number.
2) Subjective Data (___30pts.): This is the historical part of the note. It contains the following:
a) Symptom analysis/HPI(Location, quality , quantity or severity, timing, setting, factors that make it better or worse, and associate manifestations.(10pts).
b) Review of systems of associated systems, reporting all pertinent positives and negatives (10pts).
c) Any PMH, family hx, social hx, allergies, medications related to the complaint/problem (10pts). If more than one chief complaint, each should be written u in this manner.
3) Objective Data(__25pt.): Vital signs need to be present. Height and Weight should be included where appropriate.
a) Appropriate systems are examined, listed in the note and consistent with those identified in 2b.(10pts).
b) Pertinent positives and negatives must be documented for each relevant system.
c) Any abnormalities must be fully described. Measure and record sizes of things (likes moles, scars). Avoid using “ok”, “clear”, “within normal limits”, positive/ negative, and normal/abnormal to describe things. (5pts).
4) Assessment (___10pts.): Diagnoses should be clearly listed and worded appropriately.
5) Plan (___15pts.): Be sure to include any teaching, health maintenance and counseling along with the pharmacological and non-pharmacological measures. If you have more than one diagnosis, it is helpful to have this section divided into separate numbered sections.
6) Subjective/ Objective, Assessment and Management and Consistent (___10pts.): Does the note support the appropriate differential diagnosis process? Is there evidence that you know what systems and what symptoms go with which complaints? The assessment/diagnoses should be consistent with the subjective section and then the assessment and plan. The management should be consistent with the assessment/ diagnoses identified.
7) Clarity of the Write-up(___5pts.): Is it literate, organized and complete?
Knee Injury Case Studies A 15-year-old gymnast has noted knee pain that has become progressively worse during the past several months of intensive training for a statewide meet. Her physical examination indicated swelling in and around the left knee. She had some decreased range of motion and a clicking sound on flexion of the knee. The knee was otherwise stable. Studies Results Routine laboratory values Within normal limits (WNL) Long bone (femur, fibula, and tibia) X-ray No fracture Arthrocentesis with synovial fluid analysis Appearance Bloody (normal: clear and straw-colored) Mucin clot Good (normal: good) Fibrin clot Small (normal: none) White blood cells (WBCs) <200 WBC/mm3 (normal: <200 WBC/mm3 ) Neutrophils <25% (WNL) Glucose 100 mg/dL (normal: within 10 mg/dL of serum glucose level) Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the knee Blood in the joint space. Tear in the posterior aspect of the medial meniscus. No cruciate or other ligament tears Arthroscopy Tear in posterior aspect of medial meniscus Diagnostic Analysis The radiographic studies of the long bones eliminated any possibility of fracture. Arthrocentesis indicated a bloody effusion, which was probably a result of trauma. The fibrin clot was further evidence of bleeding within the joint. Arthrography indicated a tear of the medial meniscus of the knee, a common injury for gymnasts. Arthroscopy corroborated that finding. Transarthroscopic medial meniscectomy was performed. Her postoperative course was uneventful. Critical Thinking Questions 1. One of the potential complications of arthroscopy is infection. What signs and symptoms of joint infection would you emphasize in your patient teaching? 2. Why is glucose evaluated in the synovial fluid analysis? 3. What are special tests used to differentiate type of Tendon tears in the knee ? Explain how they are performed (Always on boards)
Testicular Cancer Case Studies A 21-year-old male noted pain in his right testicle while studying hard for his midterm college examinations. On self-examination, he noted a “grape sized” mass in the right testicle. This finding was corroborated by his healthcare provider. This young man had a history of delayed descent of his right testicle until the age of 1 year old. Studies Results Routine laboratory studies Within normal limits (WNL) Ultrasound the testicle Solid mass, right testicle associated with calcifications HCG (human chorionic gonadotropin) 550mIU/mL (normal: <5) CT scan of the abdomen Enlarged retroperitoneal lymph nodes CT scan of the chest Multiple pulmonary nodules Diagnostic Analysis At semester break, this young man underwent right orchiectomy. Pathology was compatible with embryonal cell carcinoma. CT directed biopsy of the most prominent pulmonary nodule indicated embryonal cell carcinoma, compatible with metastatic testicular carcinoma. During a leave of absence from college, and after banking his sperm, this young man underwent aggressive chemotherapy. Repeat testing 12 weeks after chemotherapy showed complete resolution of the pulmonary nodules and enlarged retroperitoneal lymph nodes. Critical Thinking Questions 1. What impact did an undescended testicle have on this young man’s risk for developing testicular cancer? 2. What might be the side effects of cytotoxic chemotherapy? 3. What was the purpose of preserving his sperm before chemotherapy? 4. Is this young man’s age typical for the development of testicular carcinoma?