Con-Position Proposal

Con-Position Proposal

  1. Home
  2. Nursing homework help
  3. Con-Position Proposal

Childhood depression is believed to be increasing, based on the rising number of suicides among young people. In 2008, statistics showed that suicide was the third leading cause of death among people aged 15 to 24, and the sixth leading cause of death among 5 to 14 year olds.

Antidepressants have been hailed as safe and effective miracle drugs that can cure depression, but critics argue that antidepressants are often given needlessly. Others maintain that depression should be treated by behavioral therapy instead of drugs, and many charge that antidepressants themselves are responsible for suicides among children and adolescents.

Also increasing is the rate of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), which makes it hard for children to control impulses or pay attention. Statistics show that more than 6 million children in the United States have been diagnosed with ADHD. Stimulants have been found to have a converse effect in ADHD sufferers, calming them down and helping them to focus. The best-known stimulant is Ritalin; others include Strattera and Adderall. These medications have been given to children as young as fifteen months.

While all experts agree that depression and ADHD must be treated, many are cautious about drug treatment. These critics argue that behavior drugs are often prescribed for children “off-label,” meaning that the medications have been approved for adults and older children, but have not been tested for younger ones.

In recent years, the United States Food & Drug Administration (FDA) has mandated warning labels for drugs such as Prozac, Paxil, and Zoloft, to inform doctors and patients of the danger of increased suicidal thoughts in children and adolescents taking these medications. The FDA advisory panel has also recommended a label warning that ADHD drugs can cause heart problems in some patients.

Understanding the Discussion

Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD): Children with this condition have intense, sustained difficulty paying attention and/or controlling their behavior.

Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors (MAOI): Antidepressants in this category block the activity of monoamine oxidase, the enzyme in nerve cells that breaks down neurotransmitters.

Neurotransmitters: Nerve cells communicate using neurotransmitters, chemicals in the brain that travel from one nerve cell to another, across the synapse (a tiny gap between the cells). An imbalance or lack of neurotransmitters in the synapse is associated with depression. Types of neurotransmitters include dopamine, norepinephrine and serotonin.

Psychotherapy: The process of treating mental and emotional problems with professional counseling, as in cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) or interpersonal therapy (IPT).

Reuptake: The process by which a receiving nerve cell releases the neurotransmitter back into the synapse, where it is taken up again by the sending cell.

Ritalin: Common name for the stimulant methylphenidate hydrochloride, used to treat ADHD.

Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRI): Antidepressants that work to keep serotonin active in the synapse longer.

Tricyclics: These antidepressants are given to inhibit the reuptake of both serotonin and norepinephrine and possibly other neurotransmitters.

History

Both critics and supporters of behavior drugs agree on the importance of treating depression and ADHD in children to prevent serious, and possibly lifelong, harm. But there is wide disagreement on what type of treatment is effective or even safe.

Until the 1990s, it was believed that children and adolescents were not emotionally mature enough to suffer true depression. New drugs as Prozac, developed in 1989, appeared to be much safer than the earlier tricyclic antidepressants, so doctors began prescribing them widely, and soon began prescribing them for off-label use by teens and younger children.

Since then, the use of antidepressants among children, adolescents, and even infants has increased. Critics maintain that medicating such young children is one example of widespread over-prescribing. Further, they worry that many prescriptions are written by medical doctors without psychiatric consultation or treatment. From 1996 to 1998, the number of prescriptions written by non-psychiatrists doubled, while those written by psychiatrists increased by only 18 percent.

Mental health experts maintain that nobody should ever be given behavior drugs without psychotherapy. In fact, some advocate a no-drug approach, preferring cognitive behavioral therapy or interpersonal therapy alone. In addition, critics are concerned because these medications have not been thoroughly tested for children.

Some mental health critics also reject the entire theory of depression as a biological disease. Drugs, they assert, treat only the symptoms; they are not a cure for the problem that caused the depression. Each depression is individual, they argue, so a single drug cannot be generally effective. These critics tend to consider the whole idea of antidepressants as a marketing ploy rather than a source of real help.

In addition, critics of drug therapy argue that even the best antidepressants have unpleasant and even dangerous side effects which can cause lasting damage. Many violent crimes, say some experts, are committed not by depressed people, as reported in the media, but by people under the mind-altering influence of antidepressants.

What we now call ADHD was first described in 1845 by Dr. Heinrich Hoffman, whose son exhibited typical hyperactive behavior. Sir George F. Still undoubtedly relieved the minds of many parents in 1902, when he published a series of lectures on children with behavioral problems that were caused by organic dysfunction rather than by poor parenting. Thousands of scientific papers have been written on the subject since.

While ADHD strikes in early childhood, 70-80 percent of children with the disorder continue to suffer as teens, and 60 percent continue to experience symptoms of the disorder into adulthood. ADHD is often associated with other problems, such as learning disabilities, depression and bipolar disorder. Left untreated, ADHD can increase the risk of other problems, such as substance abuse. As with depression, neurotransmitters are involved.

Proponents of Ritalin, which has been in use for fifty years, maintain that the medication is safe, its side effects are minor and it can prevent later drug abuse. Critics complain that giving children an amphetamine-like substance sends a message that contradicts anti-drug warnings. They also worry about the long-term effects of such strong medication, even if it is necessary. The drugs used to treat ADHD, they point out, have numerous known side effects, including loss of appetite, insomnia and stunted growth. Furthermore, the drugs have not been thoroughly tested for very young children. Even with these problems, Ritalin has been given to children as young as fifteen months.

Most specialists agree that true ADHD is a medical problem and requires medication. The major concern is that many children may be incorrectly diagnosed and given drugs for trivial behavior problems or for problems resulting from trauma such as sexual abuse.

Additionally, many specialists are concerned that physicians prescribe ADHD medications alone, as is often done with antidepressants. The US National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) reports that combined treatment with drugs and behavioral therapy works best. Combined treatment also often means that drug dosages can be reduced.

Behavior Drugs & Children Today

Recent FDA actions have added fuel to the debate. In 2005, the FDA mandated warning labels for SSRIs cautioning doctors and patients of the dangers posed to children and adolescents taking Prozac, Zoloft, Paxil, and other drugs. It further recommended that one of the SSRIs, paroxetine (Paxil), not be used for children and adolescents at all. At the same time, the FDA maintains that adolescents can benefit substantially from antidepressants, under careful observation. Only Prozac has been approved for use by children as young as eight. In 2009, Lexapro became FDA-approved for the treatment of depression in individuals ages 12-17. Most prescriptions for younger children are off-label.

Critics worry about physical and mental problems, such as antisocial and violent behavior, that they say are side effects of antidepressants. At the same time, many parents have become active in opposing ADHD medications. Hundreds of popular books have been written on the subject, warning against hasty diagnosis for children who are simply highly energetic. Critics contend that most of the behavior labeled ADHD actually results from medical conditions, the tensions of modern life, or trauma.

Proponents of drug therapy argue that no study has yet provided convincing evidence that Ritalin causes addiction. Critics, however, say that studies show the use of Ritalin leads to addictive behavior such as smoking. Also, they point out that there have been no studies of the long-term effects of ADHD medications.

Some critics, including medical experts, do not believe that ADHD even exists. The American Medical Association (AMA), on the other hand, charges that groups such as Scientologists have inflamed the debate with colorful public relations campaigns. Critics of ADHD medication were given a boost in late 2006 when an FDA advisory panel recommended that medications for ADHD include a “black-box’ label, the strongest warning, that the drugs present a cardiac risk to some patients.

According to the Wall Street Journal, 25 percent of children in the United States are now on prescribed medications.

Bibliography 

Books 

Berlinger, Norman T. Rescuing Your Teenager from Depression. New York: Harper Resource, 2005. Print.

Mayes, Rick, Catherin Bagwell, and Jennifer Erkulwater. Medicating Children: ADHD and Pediatric Mental Health. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 2009. Print.

Mondimore, Francis Mark. Adolescent Depression: A Guide for Parents. A Johns Hopkins Press Health Book. 2nd ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 2015. Print.

Periodicals 

Arnold, L. Eugene. “New Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Medication Options: Advances in Long-Term Treatment for a Chronically Impairing Condition.” Current Medical Literature: Pediatrics 20.1 (Mar. 2007): 1–8. Academic Search Premier. Web. 22 June 2009. http://search.ebscohost.com.chamberlainuniversity.idm.oclc.org/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN=24910243&site=ehost-live.

Clavenna, Antonio, and Maurizio Bonati. “Safety of Medicines Used for ADHD in Children: A Review of Published Prospective Clinical Trials.” Archives of Disease in Childhood 99.9 (2014): 866–72. Print.

Comstock, Edward J. “The End of Drugging Children: Toward the Genealogy of the ADHD Subject.” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 47.1 (2011): 44–69. Print.

D’Agostino, Ryan. “The Drugging of the American Boy.” Esquire Apr. 2014: 120–30. Print.

Isaacson, Goran, and Charles Rich. “Antidepressant Drugs and the Risk of Suicide in Children and Adolescents.” Pediatric Drugs 16.2 (2014): 115–22. Academic Search Complete Web. 9 Nov. 2015. http://search.ebscohost.com.chamberlainuniversity.idm.oclc.org/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=95006817.

Kozel, Maggie. “Little Pharma: The Medication of U.S. Children.” Huffington Post. TheHuffingtonPost.com, 5 Feb. 2011. Web. 9 Nov. 2015. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/maggie-kozel-md/childrens-health-care%5Fb%5F803167.html.

Mathews, Anna Wilde. “So Young and So Many Pills.” Wall Street Journal. Dow Jones, 28 Dec. 2010. Web. 9 Nov. 2015. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203731004576046073896475588.html.

“Psychiatric Medications for Children and Adolescents.” Brown University Child and Adolescent Behavior Letter 21.9 (2005): 9–10. Academic Search Premier. Web. 22 June 2009. http://search.ebscohost.com.chamberlainuniversity.idm.oclc.org/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN=18577222&site=ehost-live.

Rosenberg, Martha. “Should Children Be on These Medications?” Huffington Post. TheHuffingtonPost.com, 26 Feb. 2011. Web. 9 Nov 2015. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/martha-rosenberg/children-on-medication-%5Fb%5F820680.html.

Southammakosane, Cathy, and Kristine Schmitz. “Pediatric Psychopharmacology for Treatment of ADHD, Depression, and Anxiety.” Pediatrics 136.2 (2015): 351–59. Academic Search Complete Web. 9 Nov. 2015. http://search.ebscohost.com.chamberlainuniversity.idm.oclc.org/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=108846453.

These essays and any opinions, information, or representations contained therein are the creation of the particular author and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of EBSCO Information Services.

~~~~~~~~

By Ellen Bailey

Co-Author: Rosalyn Carson-Dewitt

Rosalyn Carson-Dewitt received an MD from Michigan State University in 1991. She is a medical and scientific writer and was editor-in-chief for Drugs, Alcohol and Tobacco: Learning about Addictive Behavior and Encyclopedia of Drugs, Alcohol and Addictive Behavior published by Macmillan Reference USA. Carson-Dewitt also worked on the Merck Manual of Diagnosis and Therapy, 18th edition.

Copyright of Points of View: Behavior Drugs & Children is the property of Great Neck Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder’s express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Professional Development Plan

NUR206: Week 8 Assignment Page 1 `

© 2018

Assignment: Professional Development Plan

Assignment Overview

In this assignment, you will create a 2-year professional career development plan in which you discuss your goals and plans for achieving them. Include your short- and long-term objectives and goals. Evaluate your present position in relation to these goals by listing your current experience and skills. Identify your strengths and weaknesses and those areas that need further development. Prepare a plan of action to achieve your goals.

Assignment Details:

Perform the following tasks: • Complete the reading assignment and the interactive lesson before attempting this assignment. • Complete a 2-year professional career development plan.

o Include your short- and long-term objectives and goals. o Evaluate your present position in relation to these goals and create a list of your current

experience and skills. o Identify your strengths and weaknesses and those areas that need further development. o Prepare a plan of action to achieve your goals.

• Write a 2-3 page paper in APA format, include a cover page. • Include the proper file naming convention: NUR206_wk8_assn_jsmith_mmddyyy.

Grading:

Criteria Excellent (3pts) Good (2pts) Needs Improvement (1pt)

Pts.

Content – Includes short- and long-term goals. – Evaluates current position and skills. – Identifies strengths, weaknesses, areas of concern. – Includes plan of action

– Includes short- and long-term goals. – Evaluates current position and skills. – Missing strengths and weaknesses. – Weak plan of action.

– Vague or missing goals – Missing evaluation. – Vague plan of action.

Organization – Well organized into separate headings. – Main points are clearly identified. – Paragraphs transition well.

– Somewhat organized. – Main points are clear. – Occasional issues with flow and transitions.

– Disorganized. – Main points are unclear – Difficult to follow or illogical.

Spelling/grammar/ APA

– No spelling or grammar errors. – APA format is correct. – Appropriate length

– Some spelling or grammar errors. – APA format is correct. – Appropriate length.

– Many spelling or grammar errors. – Incorrect APA format. – Inappropriate length.

Instructor:

Total score

  • Assignment Overview
  • Assignment Details:
 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Interdisciplinary Communication

Create a 6–8-slide PowerPoint presentation that describes  communication barriers within an interdisciplinary team and how those  barriers affect patient safety and health care outcomes. Offer a  solution in which you recommend evidence-based strategies to improve  communication within the team and explain how the strategies benefit the  team and patients.

The ability to effectively communicate as part of interdisciplinary  collaboration is essential for patient safety and successful health  care delivery.

Effective communication is important in all organizations and is  especially important in the area of health care. Communication can come  in many forms, but the crucial factor is whether the communication is  effective.

Collaboration among teams is important for the delivery of  appropriate medical care and for providing the specialized skills  necessary to meet the needs of patients and the public. Assessing the  needs of a community may involve communication across several public  service providers and private entities.

Maintaining open communication and collaboration among teams is  essential to assess the needs of a community or those of patients and  their families within a health care system. The same communication  skills must be evident within the interdisciplinary health care team, or  across the public and private sectors in a community, in order to  promote collaboration and understanding and to provide the utmost  quality service.

Imagine you are part of an interdisciplinary health care team in your  organization. Although the team has been working together for several  months, communication between members is not always efficient or  effective, and the situation has become stressful for everyone. The team  leader asks you to develop a presentation for the team that addresses  the issue.

Preparation

Search the Capella library and the Internet for scholarly and  professional peer-reviewed articles on communication. You will need at  least three articles to use as support for your work on this assessment.

Directions

Create a 6–8-slide PowerPoint presentation to examine the  communication issue and the risk it creates for positive health care  outcomes.

  • Describe the types of communication barriers that occur within an interdisciplinary team.
  • Explain how the communication barriers can impact patient safety and health care outcomes.
  • Recommend specific evidence-based strategies to improve communication within the team.
  • Explain how the strategies will benefit team members and patients.

Use the notes section of each slide to expand your points and cite  your supporting evidence. Also, include a title slide and a reference  slide that lists the resources you used in this assessment.

Additional Requirements

  • Use APA format for citations and refe
 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Benchmark – Community Teaching Plan: Community Teaching Work Plan Proposal


Report Issue

Benchmark – Community Teaching Plan: Community Teaching Work Plan Proposal

The benchmark assesses the following competency:

4.2 Communicate therapeutically with patients.

The RN to BSN program at Grand Canyon University meets the requirements for clinical competencies as defined by the Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education (CCNE) and the American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN), using nontraditional experiences for practicing nurses. These experiences come in the form of direct and indirect care experiences in which licensed nursing students engage in learning within the context of their hospital organization, specific care discipline, and local communities.

Note:  The teaching plan proposal developed in this assignment will be used to develop your Community Teaching Plan: Community Presentation due in Topic 5. You are strongly encouraged to begin working on your presentation once you have received and submitted this proposal.

Select one of the following as the focus for the teaching plan:

  1. Primary Prevention/Health Promotion
  2. Secondary Prevention/Screenings for a Vulnerable Population
  3. Bioterrorism/Disaster
  4. Environmental Issues

Use the “Community Teaching Work Plan Proposal” resource to complete this assignment. This will help you organize your plan and create an outline for the written assignment.

  1. After completing the teaching proposal, review the teaching plan proposal with a community health and public health provider in your local community.
  2. Request feedback (strengths and opportunities for improvement) from the provider.
  3. Complete the “Community Teaching Experience” form with the provider. You will submit this form in Topic 5.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. 

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Obesity Program


In this final project, you will create and evaluate a health promotion program that targets one of the following issues:

  • Tobacco Cessation
  • Diabetes
  • Obesity
  • Substance Abuse

After reviewing the Unit VIII study guide, examine the program and discuss the five major components of community health programming and the six steps of evaluation. Be sure to address the following:

  1. Provide detailed background information on the topic.
  2. Prove a minimum of three specific and realistic goals/objectives.
  3. Provide detailed information on how you will use the five steps of programming (program planning) to create a community health intervention/program.
  4. Provide detailed information on how you will use the six steps of evaluation to evaluate your program.

Your APA-formatted paper should be at least five pages (not including the title or reference pages). You are required to use at least your textbook as source material for your response. All sources used, including the textbook, must be referenced; paraphrased and quoted material must have accompanying citations

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

. Furthermore, the act further claims that there are also allowances made and highlighted inside the statue that enables to treat medical complications apart from pregnancy that may be attributed toward to using contraceptive methods (Daley, 2016).

The state where I would like to and plan to practice is the state as a nurse practitioner is the state of Florida . Moreover in the state of Florida abortion is legal as of April 2017 . There are some restrictions that apply when it comes to abortion like late term abortions. Subsequently, “there is broad consensus that abortion is stigmatized, but the role of interpersonal interaction in this process is underspecified. I examine interviews with 25 women in the United States who visited crisis pregnancy centers (CPCs)—antiabortion organizations that offer one on‐one “prolife counseling” (Kimport,2019).

More over the state of Florida infant and mother mortality rate us as follows “Florida’s infant mortality rate fell to 6.4 deaths per 1,000 live births, a record low and down 33 percent from 1990” (CBS Miami, 2019) The association with access to contraceptives and abortions and infant mortality rates in the state of Florida is that when women have access to contraceptives there would not be a need for abortions. However there is a link between unintended pregnancies and women who do not use contraceptives and abortions. Women who were having an unintended baby were most likely to seek an abortion. The state laws however allow for abortions and subsequently also provide a significant portion of restrictions for when abortions cannot be done

Reference

CBS Miami ,(2019) Florida Infant Mortality Rates drop to record low

Kimport, K. (2019). Pregnant Women’s Experiences of Crisis Pregnancy Centers: When Abortion Stigmatization Succeeds and Fails. Symbolic Interaction.

2 – yaima rosquete

The state where I plan to practice as a nurse practitioner is Florida. In terms of contraceptives under the Comprehensive Family Planning Act, statue 381.0051, states that their “access to service prohibitions except as otherwise provided that no medical agency or institution of this state or unit of local government shall interfere with the right of any patient or physician to use medically acceptable contraceptive” (Daley, 2016, p. 34). Furthermore, the act further claims that there are also allowances made and highlighted inside the statue that enables to treat medical complications apart from pregnancy that may be attributed toward to using contraceptive methods (Daley, 2016).

The laws and regulations that govern abortion in Florida tend to be more severe and restrictive compared to other states. “In 2013 Governor Ron Scott signed legislation requiring that doctors performing an abortion offer emergency health care when the baby is in some way born alive. This law is really a first degree misdemeanor that’s punishable with a year in prison along with a fine of $1000” (Sharma, Frederiksen, Malcolm, Rollison & Carter, 2018). Health care professionals and employees must highlight and report all instances towards the department of health. This can be a prime illustration of the significance and the seriousness of the laws and regulations that govern abortion in Florida. These laws and regulations broadly cover patients with and without use of insurance. The condition of Florida comes with an infant and mortality rate of 6 for each 1000 live births as stated by the connected press. The bond between contraceptive access and also the infant mortality rate appear to become congruent. But, there’s no definitive conclusion the two are associated.

Poverty is linked to the maternal and infant mortality, and issues such as diabetes, obesity, asthma and depression. The rates in Florida were 6.0 in 2016 for infant mortality compared to 7.2 as the national rate.

References

Daley D. (2016). Reproductive health and aids-related services for women: How well are they integrated? Family Planning Perspectives; 26(6):264-269. doi:10.2307/2135892.

Sharma, A. E., Frederiksen, B. N., Malcolm, N. M., Rollison, J. M., & Carter, M. W. (2018). Community education and engagement in family planning: Updated systematic review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 55(5), 747–758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2018.06.022.

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Pre-Briefing Simulation And Drug Cards

 Pre-Briefing Simulation And Drug Cards 

                            PATIENT: Keola Akana 

THIS ASSIGNMENT HAS TWO PART QUESTIONS

                                                INSTRUCTION

Please keep in mind you will also be required to recognize a variety of signs and symptoms linked to abnormalities in these skills. 

Therefore, in order to prepare for the simulation, you are required to complete the Pre-Briefing questions & Drug Cards below and submit to the faculty facilitating the simulation prior to the start of pre-briefing. If you do not complete the pre-briefing questions below and submit to faculty facilitating the simulation prior to the start of pre-briefing, you will not be permitted to participate in the simulation. 

                                  PART 1  QUESTIONS   

SCENARIO OVERVIEW: 

Keola Akana is a 70-year-old male with a history of heart failure. He was admitted to the medical-surgical unit early on Monday morning for medication adjustment, monitoring, and cardiac rehabilitation. The scenario takes place on Monday at 0900, at which time morning medications are due. 

1. What are the nutritional implications, key assessment findings, and nursing interventions for a patient with hypokalemia? 

2. What are the signs and symptoms of digoxin toxicity and how would the nurse assess for these symptoms? In your response, be sure to include specific body systems. 

3. How would the nurse provide family-centered care? 

PLEASE USE REFERENCE LESS THAN 5 YEARS OLD AND APA FORMAT NEEDED.

                          PART 11 QUESTIONS   

SCENARIO OVERVIEW: 

Keola Akana is a 70-year-old male with a history of heart failure. He was admitted to the medical-surgical unit early on Monday morning for medication adjustment, monitoring and cardiac rehabilitation.  During this scenario, students will have the opportunity to assess and manage medication administration for a patient experiencing digoxin toxicity.

FOR EACH OF THE FOLLOWING DRUGS BELOW THAT WAS PRESCRIBED FOR THE ABOVE PATIENT WITH HEART FAILURE, WRITE OUT IN DRUG CARD FORMAT FOLLOWING THE HEADING BELOW

1) THE INDICATION, (2) DOSAGE, (3) CONTRAINDICATION, (4) SIDE EFFECTS, (5) ADVERSE EFFECTS AND (6) NURSING CONSIDERATION

Patient: Keola Akana Drug Lists

Lasix 40 mg po now and daily 

Potassium Chloride CR 10 mEq po daily

Digoxin 0.25 mg po now and daily 

Atenolol 50mg po now and daily 

Acetaminophen 650 mg po Q 4 hrs PRN mild pain or temp greater than 101.3 

IV saline flush Q 8hrs and PRN 

N:B: SEE THE ATTACHED SAMPLE OF THE DRUG CARD LIST

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Ethical considerations in health care information is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

New practice approaches are present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

Intra professional collaboration information is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

Health care delivery and clinical systems information is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

Ethical considerations in health care information is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

Population health concerns information is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

Information on the role of technology in improving health care outcomes is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

Health policy information content is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

Information on leadership and economic models is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

Information on health disparities is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

The work is well presented and includes all required elements. The overall appearance is neat and professional.

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

In this assignment, students will pull together the change proposal project components they have been working on throughout the course to create a proposal inclusive of sections for each content focus area in the course. At the conclusion of this project, the student will be able to apply evidence-based research steps and processes required as the foundation to address a clinically oriented problem or issue in future practice.

Students will develop a 1,250-1,500 word paper that includes the following information as it applies to the problem, issue, suggestion, initiative, or educational need profiled in the capstone change proposal:

  1. Background
  2. Problem statement
  3. Purpose of the change proposal
  4. PICOT
  5. Literature search strategy employed
  6. Evaluation of the literature
  7. Applicable change or nursing theory utilized
  8. Proposed implementation plan with outcome measures
  9. Identification of potential barriers to plan implementation, and a discussion of how these could be overcome
  10. Appendix section, if tables, graphs, surveys, educational materials, etc. are created

Review the feedback from your instructor on the Topic 3 assignment, PICOT Statement Paper, and Topic 6 assignment, Literature Review. Use the feedback to make appropriate revisions to the portfolio components before submitting.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Refinement of a Nursing Concern into an Evidence-based Practice Proposal Using the Research Process

C:\Users\D01030541\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\7T7OKQBI\Pre-licensure Header_Seal Only (3).jpg

Week 2: Refinement of a Nursing Concern into an Evidence-based Practice Proposal Using the Research Process

Purpose

This assignment provides the opportunity for the student to continue work on a previously identified area or phenomenon of interest related to their MSN specialty track. Week Two’s assignment builds upon the identified area of interest by developing an overview of the evidence-based practice (EBP) project and the PCIOT/PICo question. This assignment initiates the evidence-based practice proposal that is continued throughout the entire course with each assignment adding components of the research process.

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

CO#1 Integrate evidence-based practice and research to support advancement of holistic nursing care in diverse healthcare settings. PO 1

CO#2 Integrate knowledge related to evidence-based practice and person-centered care to improve healthcare outcomes.  PO 2, 5

CO#4 Develop knowledge related to research and evidence-based practice as a basis for designing and critiquing research studies. PO 1, 2, 3, 5

Due Date: Sunday 11:59 PM MT at the end of Week Two

Total Points Possible: 150 points

Requirements

Description of the Assignment

This assignment builds on the identification of a nursing concern from NR 500 and the application of a nursing theory to the selected concern from NR 501. For this course, the selected concern and nursing theory then serve as a foundation to the identification of PICOT/PICo. Identification of the literature search strategy is also required. The purpose of the MSN project proposal is to translate evidence currently found in the literature into practice within the chosen specialty track.  Due to the research complexity, time involvement, and implications regarding human subjects, drug studies are not acceptable areas of interest for a MSN project.

Criteria for Content

1. Overview of Selected Evidenced-based Practice Project: This section provides a foundation to the MSN EBP scholarly project. It should contain the following elements:

· Explain the relationship between research and evidenced-based practice (EBP)

· Distinguish how EBP is different from research

· Explain the contribution of EBP to professional nursing

· Identify your MSN Program Specialty Track and practice focus

· Explain how EBP promotes change within your future practice setting

2. Identification of the Nursing Concern to be Improved: This section provides a comprehensive discussion of the selected nursing concern. It should contain the following elements:

· Explain the selected nursing concern in detail

· Identify how frequently the selected concern occurs within your specialty track setting

· Identify the stakeholders impacted by the concern

· Identify the consequences of the selected concern

· Identify your proposed solution to the selected concern

· Identify a purpose statement for this EBP proposal

3. PICOT/PICo question and Literature Search Process: This section identifies the PICOT/PICo question that will used for this EBP proposal. The literature search parameters will also be identified. It should contain the following elements:

· Identify the question in correct format with all required elements

· PICOT for quantitative research approach

· PICo for qualitative research approach

· Identify how the expected outcome will be useful to your future practice setting

· Discuss the purpose of conducting a literature review and the contribution it will provide to this EBP proposal

· Identify the steps used to conduct a literature review for this EBP proposal by including:

· The specific library databases used

· The key search terms and phrases used

· The minor (additional) search terms and phrases used

· Identify any specialty organization that is relevant to this EBP proposal

4. Theoretical Framework: This section presents the theoretical framework that will used in this EBP project. It should contain the following section:

· Explain the theoretical framework to be used in this EBP proposal

· Describe how the identified theoretical framework is applied to this EBP proposal

Preparing the Assignment

Criteria for Format and Special Instructions

1. The paper (excluding the title page and reference page) should be at least 4, but no more than 7 pages. Points will be lost for not meeting these length requirements.

2. Title page, running head, body of paper, and reference page must follow APA guidelines as found in the 6th edition of the manual. This includes the use of headings for each section of the paper except for the introduction where no heading is used.

3. A minimum of 6 (six) appropriate research-based scholarly references must be used. Required textbook for this course, dictionary and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information may NOT be used as scholarly references for this assignment. For additional assistance regarding scholarly nursing references, please see “What is a scholarly source” located in the Course Resources tab. Be aware that information from .com websites may be incorrect and should be avoided. References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale is provided and the instructor has approved them prior to submission of the assignment.

4. Ideas and information from scholarly, peer reviewed, nursing sources must be cited and referenced correctly.

5. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are followed and consistent with formal, scientific writing.

Directions and Assignment Criteria

Assignment CriteriaPoints%Description
Overview of Selected Evidenced-based Practice Project2517Required content for this section includes:· Explain the relationship between research and evidenced-based practice (EBP)· Distinguish how EBP is different from research· Explain the contribution of EBP to professional nursing· Identify your MSN Program Specialty Track and practice focus· Explain how EBP promotes change within your future practice setting
Identification of the Nursing Concern to be Improved2517Required content for this section includes:· Explain the selected nursing concern in detail· Identify how frequently the selected concern occurs within your specialty track· Identify the stakeholders impacted by the concern· Identify the consequences of the selected concern· Identify your proposed solution to the selected concern· Identify a purpose statement for this EBP proposal
PICOT/PICo question and Literature Search Process2013The required content for this section includes:Identify the question in correct format with all required elements:· PICOT for quantitative research approach· PICo for qualitative research approach· Identify how the expected outcome will be useful to your future practice setting· Discuss the purpose of conducting a literature review and the contribution it will provide to this EBP proposal· Identify the steps used to conduct a literature review for this EBP proposal by including:· The specific library databases used· The key search terms and phrases used· The minor (additional) search terms and phrases used· Identify any specialty organization that is relevant to this EBP proposal
Theoretical Framework2016The required content for this section includes:· Explain the theoretical framework to be used in this EBP proposal· Describe how the identified theoretical framework is applied to this EBP proposal
Paper Specifications108Paper meets length requirements of 5 to 8 pages.Minimum of 6 (six) appropriate research scholarly nursing referencesA dictionary, required textbook for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, may NOT be used as scholarly references for this assignment.References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale is provided and the instructor has approved them prior to assignment submission.
APA Format (6th edition)2517Title page, running head, body of paper, and reference page must follow APA guidelines as found in the 6th edition of the manual. This includes the use of headings for each section of the paper except for the introduction where no heading is used.One deduction for each type of APA style error
Citations in Text107Ideas and information that come from readings must be cited and referenced correctly.
Writing Mechanics1510Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are followed and consistent with formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual.
Total 150100 %
C:\Users\D01030541\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\7T7OKQBI\Pre-licensure Header_Seal Only (3).jpg

Chamberlain College of Nursing NR505 Advanced Research Methods: Evidenced Based Practice

Chamberlain College of Nursing NR505 Advanced Research Methods: Evidenced Based Practice

NR505: W2 Assignment Refinement of Nsg. Concern Rev-7/31/2017 (AR)

NR505: W2 Assignment Refinement of Nsg. Concern Rev-7/31/2017 (AR),REV 1/10/18 (AR)1

Grading Rubric

Assignment CriteriaExceptional(100%)Outstanding or highest level of performanceExceeds(88%)Very good or high level of performanceMeets(80%)Competent or satisfactory level of performanceNeeds Improvement(38%)Poor or failing level of performanceDeveloping(0)Unsatisfactory level of performance
ContentPossible Points = 100 Points
Overview of Selected Evidenced-based Practice Project25 Points22 Points20 Points10 Points0 Points
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:· Explain the relationship between research and evidence-based practice (EBP)· Distinguish how EBP is different from research· Explain the contribution of EBP to professional nursing· Identify your MSN Program Specialty Track and practice focus· Explain how EBP promotes change within your future practice settingPresentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included allof the following elements:· Explain the relationship between research and evidence-based practice (EBP)· Distinguish how EBP is different from research· Explain the contribution of EBP to professional nursing· Identify your MSN Program Specialty Track and practice focus· Explain how EBP promotes change within your future practice settingPresentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements:· Explain the relationship between research and evidence-based practice (EBP)· Distinguish how EBP is different from research· Explain the contribution of EBP to professional nursing· Identify your MSN Program Specialty Track and practice focus· Explain how EBP promotes change within your future practice settingPresentation of information in one or two of the following elements fails to meet expectations:· Explain the relationship between research and evidence-based practice (EBP)· Distinguish how EBP is different from research· Explain the contribution of EBP to professional nursing· Identify your MSN Program Specialty Track and practice focus· Explain how EBP promotes change within your future practice settingPresentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements:· Explain the relationship between research and evidence-based practice (EBP)· Distinguish how EBP is different from research· Explain the contribution of EBP to professional nursing· Identify your MSN Program Specialty Track and practice focus· Explain how EBP promotes change within your future practice setting
Identification of the Nursing Concern to be Improved25 Points22 Points20 Points10 Points0 Points
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:· Explain the selected nursing concern in detail· Identify how frequently the selected concern occurs within your specialty track setting· Identify the stakeholders impacted by the concern· Identify the consequences of the selected concern· Identify your proposed solution to the selected concern· Identify a purpose statement for this EBP proposalPresentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included allof the following elements:· Explain the selected nursing concern in detail· Identify how frequently the selected concern occurs within your specialty track setting· Identify the stakeholders impacted by the concern· Identify the consequences of the selected concern· Identify your proposed solution to the selected concern· Identify a purpose statement for this EBP proposalPresentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements:· Explain the selected nursing concern in detail· Identify how frequently the selected concern occurs within your specialty track setting· Identify the stakeholders impacted by the concern· Identify the consequences of the selected concern· Identify your proposed solution to the selected concern· Identify a purpose statement for this EBP proposalPresentation of information in one, two or three of the following elements fails to meet expectations:· Explain the selected nursing concern in detail· Identify how frequently the selected concern occurs within your specialty track setting· Identify the stakeholders impacted by the concern· Identify the consequences of the selected concern· Identify your proposed solution to the selected concern· Identify a purpose statement for this EBP proposalPresentation of information is unsatisfactory in four or more of the following elements:· Explain the selected nursing concern in detail· Identify how frequently the selected concern occurs within your specialty track setting· Identify the stakeholders impacted by the concern· Identify the consequences of the selected concern· Identify your proposed solution to the selected concern· Identify a purpose statement for this EBP proposal
PICOT/PICo question and Literature Search Process20 Points18 Points16 Points8 Points0 Points
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:· Identify the question in correct format with all required elements· PICOT for quantitative research approach· PICo for qualitative research approach· Identify how the expected outcome will be useful to your future practice setting· Discuss the purpose of conducting literature review and the contribution it will provide to this EBP proposal· Identify the steps used to conduct a literature review for this EBP proposal by including:· The specific library databases used· The key search terms and phrases used· The minor (additional) search terms and phrases used· Identify any specialty organization that is relevant to this EBP proposalPresentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included allof the following elements:· Identify the question in correct format with all required elements· PICOT for quantitative research approach· PICo for qualitative research approach· Identify how the expected outcome will be useful to your future practice setting· Discuss the purpose of conducting literature review and the contribution it will provide to this EBP proposal· Identify the steps used to conduct a literature review for this EBP proposal by including:· The specific library databases used· The key search terms and phrases used· The minor (additional) search terms and phrases used· Identify any specialty organization that is relevant to this EBP proposalPresentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements:· Identify the question in correct format with all required elements· PICOT for quantitative research approach· PICo for qualitative research approach· Identify how the expected outcomewill be useful to your future practice setting· Discuss the purpose of conducting literature review and the contribution it will provide to this EBP proposal· Identify the steps used to conduct a literature review for this EBP proposal by including:· The specific library databases used· The key search terms and phrases used· The minor (additional) search terms and phrases used· Identify any specialty organization that is relevant to this EBP proposalPresentation of information in one or two of the following elements fails to meet expectations:· Identify the question in correct format with all required elements· PICOT for quantitative research approach· PICo for qualitative research approach· Identify how the expected outcome will be useful to your future practice setting· Discuss the purpose of conducting literature review and the contribution it will provide to this EBP proposal· Identify the steps used to conduct a literature review for this EBP proposal by including:· The specific library databases used· The key search terms and phrases used· The minor (additional) search terms and phrases used· Identify any specialty organization that is relevant to this EBP proposalPresentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements:· Identify the question in correct format with all required elements· PICOT for quantitative research approach· PICo for qualitative research approach· Identify how the expected outcome will be useful to your future practice setting· Discuss the purpose of conducting literature review and the contribution it will provide to this EBP proposal· Identify the steps used to conduct a literature review for this EBP proposal by including:· The specific library databases used· The key search terms and phrases used· The minor (additional) search terms and phrases used· Identify any specialty organization that is relevant to this EBP proposal
Theoretical Framework20 Points18 Points16 Points8 Points0 Points
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:· Explain the theoretical framework to be used in this EBP proposal· Describe how the identified theoretical framework is applies to this EBP proposalPresentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included allof the following elements:· Explain the theoretical framework to be used in this EBP proposal· Describe how the identified theoretical framework is applies to this EBP proposalPresentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements:· Explain the theoretical framework to be used in this EBP proposal· Describe how the identified theoretical framework is applies to this EBP proposalPresentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations:· Explain the theoretical framework to be used in this EBP proposal· Describe how the identified theoretical framework is applies to this EBP proposalPresentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following:· Explain the theoretical framework to be used in this EBP proposal· Describe how the identified theoretical framework is applies to this EBP proposal
Paper Specifications10 Points9 Points8 Points4 Points0 Points
This section included all of the following:· Paper meet length requirements of 5 to 8 page.· Minimum of 6 (six) scholarly nursing references· Dictionary, required textbook for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, were NOT used as scholarly references.· All references are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale was provided and the instructor approved them.This section included three of the following:· Paper meet length requirements of 5 to 8 page.· Minimum of 6 (six) scholarly nursing references· Dictionary, required textbook for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, were NOT used as scholarly references.· All references are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale was provided and the instructor approved them.This section included only two of the following:· Paper meet length requirements of 5 to 8 page.· Minimum of 6 (six) scholarly nursing references· Dictionary, required textbook for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, were NOT used as scholarly references.· All references are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale was provided and the instructor approved them.This section included only one of the following:· Paper meet length requirements of 5 to 8 page.· Minimum of 6 (six) scholarly nursing references· Dictionary, required textbook for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, were NOT used as scholarly references.· All references are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale was provided and the instructor approved them.This section included none of the following:· Paper meet length requirements of 5 to 8 page.· Minimum of 6 (six) scholarly nursing references· Dictionary, required textbook for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, were NOT used as scholarly references.· All references are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale was provided and the instructor approved them.
Content Subtotal ________of 100 points
FormatPossible Points = 50 Points
APA Style25 Points22 Points20 Points10 Points0 Points
APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the· title page,· running head,· body of paper (including margins, headings, font etc), andreference pageOne deduction for each type of APA format error0 to 1 APA error was presentAPA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the· title page,· running head,· body of paper (including margins, headings, font etc), andreference pageOne deduction for each type of APA format error2 – 3 APA errors were presentAPA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the· title page,· running head,· body of paper (including margins, headings, font etc), andreference pageOne deduction for each type of APA format error4 – 5 APA errors were are presentAPA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the· title page,· running head,· body of paper (including margins, headings, font etc), andreference pageOne deduction for each type of APA format error6 – 7 APA errors were presentAPA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the· title page,· running head,body of paper (including margins, headings, font etc), and reference pageOne deduction for each type of APA format error8 or greater APA errors were present
Citations10 Points9 Points8 Points4 Points0 Points
There were 0-1 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledgeThere were 2-3 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledgeThere were 4-5 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledgeThere were 6-7 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledgeThere were 8 or greater errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge
Writing Mechanics15 Points13 Points12 Points6 Points0 Points
1–2 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual3 – 4 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual5 – 6 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual7 – 8 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual9 or greater errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual
Format Subtotal_____of 50 points
Total Points_____of 150 points
NR505: W2 Assignment Refinement of Nsg. Concern Rev-7/31/2017 (AR); Rev 11/20/2017 (AR)13
 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"