Drawing on your previous assignments, your final project will demonstrate your understanding of the context and purpose of the task force, will propose an approach and assessment of the community collaboration, will present rationale and reflection of your recommendations, and will demonstrate communication skills. You are to consider yourself as the leader of the task force and an employee of the organization based on the Unit 4 assignment. You are to use the community identified in the assignment in Unit 2 and the social problem identified in the discussion in Unit 5. Your audience is the task force comprised of stakeholders from the assignment in Unit 7.

Your final project will consist of three pieces:

• An overview of the initiative (1000–1250 words) plus title page and references.
• An appendix of communications with the task force.
• A PowerPoint presentation to introduce the stakeholders to the new initiative, potential approaches, and evaluation methods. Use slide notes to indicate what you would say during the presentation.

Initiative Overview: This section of your paper is 1000–1250 words plus references that provide an overview of the task force, your organization as lead, the community and its social problem, historical issues, and diversity in stakeholders.

Based on the current community problem that has been identified, you are to consider different community outreach approaches to address the issue. While you may present several options to the task force, you need to determine which ones are most appropriate and, specifically, which one is the best fit. As you recognize that the task force is going to be held accountable for its work, you also need to propose assessment approaches that would pair with the community outreach approaches you propose. In addition, you will need to support recommendations with theory, models, and scholarly literature. The paper will be a scholarly reflection presenting your rationale for your choices in approach, in assessment, and in communication.

Appendix of Communications: This is a collection of exemplars on how you as the task force leader communicate with potential stakeholders and, specifically, task force members. Each item in the appendix should come with its own face sheet describing the type of communication, its purpose, its audience, and the rationale for this medium of communication. Literature is recommended to strengthen your choice of content and medium.

As a good practice, a leader would e-mail the task force an agenda, handouts, and PowerPoint slides as note pages with narrative prior to the meeting. These documents will be your appendix for the paper.

A PowerPoint Presentation With Speaker Notes: This is a presentation that would be given to the stakeholders to introduce the new initiative, potential approaches, and evaluation. Utilize the slide notes to present your narrative to accompany the slides and strengthen the demonstration of integrating the literature through in-text citations.

As the task force leader, you are to provide structure and direction for the newly developed initiative. To lead this task force, you will need to orient the group to the purpose and context of the task force as well as provide options and recommendations for proceeding with this interagency community collaboration.

Project Requirements

To achieve a successful project experience and outcome, you are expected to meet the following requirements:

• Written communication: Written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message.
• Number of references: Minimum of eight scholarly references from appropriate periodicals, newspapers, and journals.
• APA formatting: The paper must be completed using APA (6th edition) style and formatting.
• Paper length: Your paper should be 8–10 pages, not including the title page and references.
• Turnitin: Run a Turnitin report and submit it with your assignment.
• Paper format: Break your paper into sections for each of these areas:
  • An overview of the initiative (1000–1250 words) plus title page and references.
  • An appendix of communications with the task force.
• PowerPoint Presentation: Your presentation should be 10–12 slides long and include title and reference slides. It should be visually engaging, and include slide notes showing what you would say during the presentation. APA style need not be followed except for references.

This assignment is to be uploaded as one PDF file.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.

—Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790)

American Politician

Couples are impacted by many external factors that may negatively affect their system.  Couples are impacted by common life stage transitions (e.g., children introduced to the system by birth or adoption, empty nests when children become adults, blended families), as well as uncommon life events such as infidelity, substance use, financial challenges, gambling problems.  When working with couples it is important to remain aware of any external factors the couple is experiencing to help understand the impact on the dyad.

For this Discussion, search the Walden Library for an article that discusses treating couples where an external factor noted above has negatively impacted the couple to the point they are considering divorce.

Post an analysis of the article you found. In the analysis, identify which theory was utilized to treat this issue.  Then, discuss if the treatment was effective or ineffective in helping the couple work through the issue. Finally, explain whether or not you believe there is some other intervention that would be beneficial for this situation.

Be sure to support your postings and responses with specific references to the resources.

Read a selection of your colleagues’ postings.

Respond to two of your colleagues’ postings in one or more of the following ways:

·  Ask a probing question.

·  Share an insight from having read your colleague’s posting.

·  Offer and support an opinion.

·  Make a suggestion.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Discussion: Client Issues

Clinical mental health counselors, like doctors and lawyers, practice in specialty areas. These areas are specific to client issues or populations for which the counselor has had advanced clinical training and experience. Often, counselors enter a training program with an idea of the client issues or populations for which they have a passion. These specialty areas include, but are not limited to, drug and alcohol treatment, eating disorders, trauma, crisis management, depression, and/or anxiety. You might not know what area of counseling you’d like to practice, and that’s OK! Feel free to pick a topic that is most interesting to you at this point in your training.

For this Discussion, you will explore various client issues and analyze a video concerning a client population or issue that interests you. Your analysis, and the resulting dialogue with your colleagues, will help you as you work to determine the client issue or population with which you would like to specialize.

To Prepare:

Review Section 3, “Client Issues and Advocacy,” from the Erford course text.

In addition to the assigned reading (Chapter 8), select one additional chapter from Section 3 to review and incorporate into this discussion: Chapters 7, 9, 10, 11, or 12.

Search the Walden Library and choose a video that demonstrates a client population or client issue that interests you. Think about why you selected this video. The video should align with the chapter you have selected.

Also, as you review the video, notice what the clinical mental health counselor does during the session.

After reviewing the video, reflect on anything that surprised you in the video.

Think about any insights you gained or conclusions you drew about client issues and this population from the video and the chapter, noting specifically if anything reinforced your desire to work with this client issue or population.

By Day 3

Post the following:

The title and a brief description of the video you selected.

Explain why this client issue and/or population interests you.

Explain any insights you gained or conclusions you drew about working with that client issue or population.

Finally, explain how this video and chapter may have confirmed or challenged your interest in working with this client issue or population, and explain why.

In addition to citing the video you selected, be sure to support your postings and responses with specific citations to the Learning Resources (chapter readings) and additional scholarly resources as needed to support your perspectives.

Read your colleagues’ postings.

By Day 6

Respond to at least two different colleagues’ postings by commenting on their choice of client issue or population, and/or explaining any new insight or curiosity that resulted from reading their post.

Be sure to support your postings and responses with specific references to the Learning Resources. Use proper APA format and citations.

Return to this Discussion in a few days to read the responses to your initial posting. Note what you have learned and/or any insights that you have gained as a result of your colleagues’ comments.

Submission and Grading Information

Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:

Week 7 Discussion Rubric

Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 6

To participate in this Discussion:

Week 7 Discussion

Final Project: Part 1: Identify Your Interview Subject

In Week 5, you began work on your Final Project by finding websites and online tools to aid in the selection of an interview subject. This week, you will put those sources to use by searching for and identifying your interview subject.

For Part 1 of your Final Project, you will identify the mental health counselor you selected as the interview subject for your Final Project. You will provide a full description of the interview subject, and you will explain why you selected this counselor to interview.

To Prepare:

Review the Final Project Overview in this week’s Learning Resources.

Identify the licensed mental health counselor you have selected to interview.

Assignment (1 page):

Using the Final Project Interview Subject Template in this week’s Learning Resources, write a one page summary and include:

Who you are interviewing.

Describe his or her professional license, setting, population/specialization, and any other relevant information.

Explain why you selected this counselor to interview.

Even though this assignment is only 1 page, you are expected to apply the same APA format and style and scholarly writing requirements that you have applied to other formal writing assignments in this course.

Support your Final Project Part 1 Assignment by citing all resources in APA format and style, including those in the Learning Resources. Be sure to include a reference page for your resources.

By Day 7

Submit your Final Project Part 1 Assignment.

Submission and Grading Information

To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK7Proj+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.

Click the Week 7 Project Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.

Click the Week 7 Project link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from thisarea.

Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK7Proj+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.

If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.

Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.

Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:

Week 7 Project Rubric

Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

Submit your Week 7 Final Project draft and review the originality report.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

You must complete an analytical philosophy paper as your final project. Overview One of the main tasks of this course is the preparation of an ethical decision‐making paper based on the theories learned within the class. Based on the knowledge that you have acquired in this course and through your own faculties of reason and insight, you will (1) examine in detail an ethical dilemma of your choosing from the textbook, (2) determine how each of the theories that you have studied in the course would respond to the dilemma, creating an argument for and an argument against your topic, and (3) give your own perspective. The project is divided into two milestones, which will be submitted at various points throughout the course to scaffold learning and ensure quality final submissions. These milestones will be submitted in Modules One and Three. The final product will be submitted in Module Seven. This assessment will address the following course outcomes:  Evaluate philosophical theories for their implications to the process of ethical decision making  Apply ethical principles to analyses of practical and classical dilemmas using appropriate philosophical concepts  Construct supporting and refuting arguments for the application of ethical decision making  Employ personal moral framework for effectively critiquing and defending ethical decisions Prompt This paper must be written in a scholarly manner using APA formatting and resources from the library and scholarly websites that end in .gov, .edu, .org, .mil. Nothing will be accepted from open sources such as Wikipedia. Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed: I. Introduction: Compose an introduction that provides background information on the topic and premise of the ethical dilemma, its main arguments, and a summary of the evidence used to support the arguments. a. Provide background on the dilemma. What subject is it addressing? What are all of the dimensions and sides to the dilemma? Why have you chosen this dilemma? b. Briefly explain the evidence that supports the arguments. What evidence do they use to back up their arguments and support their claims? Is the evidence free from bias and assumptions? Does it successfully back up a coherent argument? II. Evaluate a dilemma a. Analyze a dilemma by considering all dimensions and sides i. Apply ethical theories to your analysis ii. Use philosophical concepts appropriate to your analysis iii. Present a clear explanation of all appropriate dimensions to the selected dilemma III. Formulate an argument a. Assertion: Take a position b. Reason with facts as part of the argument. What facts will you employ to back your assertions? What facts seem plausible to you, despite your argument? How will you incorporate those into your argument? c. Critique the evidence as part of your argument. What evidence supports your argument? What evidence do you have to accept that may not support your argument? IV. Formulate a refuting argument (refutation) a. Assertion: Take a position b. Reason with facts as part of the refuting argument. What will you employ to back your assertions? What facts seem plausible to you, despite your refuting argument? How will you incorporate those into your argument? c. Critique the evidence as part of your refuting argument. What evidence supports your refuting argument? What evidence do you have to accept that may not support your refuting argument? V. Reflect on how you use your critical thinking skills to make decisions. a. Discuss the critical thinking skills you used during the evaluation. How did you approach formulating your own opinions? How did you incorporate the evidence to make your arguments stronger? What areas did you find more and less difficult to approach? b. Discuss how you apply the skills of an ethicist to issues in your everyday life. How do you apply different types of reasoning to your decisions? How do you solve challenges using your own moral framework? How do you confront arguments and find solutions?

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"