Throughout history, community leaders deemed it necessary to  determine core principles, rules, and values to ensure the existence of a  productive and healthy community. These principles, rules, and values  serve as the foundation for establishing and maintaining societies that  support the mental health and welfare of their members. Your values give  rise to passion around issues that you believe need changing and that  motivate you to take action. By upholding these values, you can  contribute to a society that supports its members.

To prepare:

• Select a societal issue from anywhere in the world  about which you are passionate. If you selected a societal issue for  your Capstone Project, select a different one to use for this  Discussion. If you selected a profession-related issue for the Capstone  Project, you should select a societal issue for this Discussion.
• Think about your personal values that make this  issue important to you and how upholding these values might contribute  to society.

Reference: Wronka, J. (2008). Preface. In Human rights and social justice: Social action and service for the helping and health professions (p. xix). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

With these thoughts in mind: 

Post  a brief description of the  societal issue you selected. Then, explain the values that give rise to  your passion for this issue. Explain how upholding these values might  contribute to creating a society that supports the mental health and  welfare of its members, remembering the broad conceptualization of  mental health and human rights. Finally, explain how you might work with  individuals from a different profession to address the issue.

Be sure to support your postings and responses with specific references to the Learning Resources.

equired Readings

Wronka, J. (2017). Human rights and social justice: Social action and service for the helping and health professions (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Preface (pp. xix–xxvii)
Chapter 1, “Introduction” (pp. 5–50)
Chapter 2, “Before and Beyond the Universal Declaration of Human Rights” (pp. 51–120)
Appendix A, “The Universal Declaration of Human Rights” (pp. 349–354)
Appendix B, “Portions of Select Articles From  Select Major International Documents Following the Universal Declaration  of Human Rights” (pp. 355–358)

Graber, D. R., & Kilpatrick, A. O. (2008). Establishing values-based leadership and value systems in healthcare organizations. Journal of Health & Human Services Administration, 31(2), 179–197. Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.

Hemmelgarn, A., & Basso, P. (2016). Joining forces: A crosswalk of the human services value curve with organizational culture and climate. Policy & Practice, (3), 24. Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.

Required Media

Laureate Education (Producer). (2016). Final project: Developing a strategic plan [Podcast]. Baltimore, MD: Author.https://mym.cdn.laureate-media.com/2dett4d/Walden/HUMN/8660/CH/mm/final_project/index.html
 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Your initial discussion thread is due on Day 3 (Thursday) and you have until Day 7 (Monday) to respond to your classmates. Your grade will reflect both the quality of your initial post and the depth of your responses. Reference the Discussion Forum Grading Rubric for guidance on how your discussion will be evaluated.

The   “Self” and Communication

In Chapter 2 of your text, Bevan & Sole (2014) lay out many psychological concepts concerning the “self.” These key elements of human psychology are central to how we communicate with ourselves (intrapersonal communication) and others (interpersonal communication).
Prepare: As you prepare to write your discussion for this topic, take a few moments to do the following:

• Read the writing prompt below in its      entirety. Note that there are four      tasks to complete.
  1. Define self-concept.
  2. Define self-image.
  3. Define self-esteem.
  4. Reflect on how one of these has impacted your       interpersonal communication.
• Review Chapter 2 in your text.
• Focus on the segments of the book on self-concept,      self-image, and self-esteem.
• Review the grading rubric and note that 25% of your      grade is based on your application of course material (Content/Subject      Knowledge) and 25% is based on your ability to demonstrate you are      thinking critically and presenting original ideas.

Reflect: Take time to reflect on how your self-concept, self-image, or self-esteem have affected the way you communicate with others and, perhaps, how you believe others respond to you.
Write: Based on the information in Chapter 2:

• Define self-concept, self-image, and self-esteem. Write      at least two sentences on each term.
• Provide an example of how your “self-concept,”      “self-image,” or “self-esteem” has affected your interpersonal      communication.
• Use specific examples to illustrate your point.
• Use the text to support your points about the      relationship between psychology and communication and for your definitions      of the three key terms.

Thoroughly address all four elements of this prompt.  Consider copying and pasting these tasks into a word file and addressing each of them separately.
Your initial response should be 200-300 words in length and is due by Thursday, Day 3.
Respond to Peers: Review your classmates’ posts and try to find some common ground or to expand on the students’ ideas. Use the text to extend your classmates’ points about psychology and communication. Ask questions that will deepen everyone’s understanding of the key concepts. Respond to at least two of your classmates’ posts by Monday, Day 7. Response posts must be 125 to 200 words in length. If you have questions about how to participate in discussions, consult “About Discussions” under the Course Home menu.

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Thematic Backpack Plan
As educators, we want to encourage active participation among the diverse and busy families we work with in ways that consider their various structures, needs, lifestyles, and schedules. We teach children about health, wellness, nutrition, and safety in school; however, we want to offer families support for continuing this education in the home. Thematic backpacks, which are sent home with children for a week throughout the year, either on a rotating schedule or a sign-out system, is one idea for how to engage families at home. Thematic backpacks include materials, parent information, games, manipulatives, and other resources all centered on a teacher-created thematic plan to explore the contents in a fun and engaging way at home with the family. Children love these, and family members can be involved in learning at home when it is convenient for them.
Create a plan for the development of a health, wellness, nutrition, and safety unit backpack that you can send home with your families. For this assignment, only the written plan is required; however, you are encouraged to create this resource as you develop the plan. The purpose of the backpack is to encourage families to explore the areas of health, wellness, nutrition, and safety at home.
The requirements for your written plan are as follows:

1. Introduction letter (no longer than one page):
   • Explain the purpose of the backpack. This should be       written in a family-friendly form and be visually appealing. You may wish       to use colored font, graphics, or pictures to set the tone for a fun and       engaging experience.
2. Health:
   • Describe one idea, activity, or game centered on an       important health concept for families to explore. For example, you may       include a sorting game that has pictures or text of sick/hurt children.       Families can sort into two piles: “Okay to go to school” or “Stay home.”       Example pictures/text could include runny nose, fever, scraped knee,       sneezing, band-aid, etc. Try to think about creative fun ideas that allow       families to explore the topic and materials.
3. Wellness:
   • Describe one idea, activity, or game centered on an       important wellness concept for families to explore. For example, you may       include ideas for a family exercise night or an outdoor scavenger hunt.
4. Nutrition:
   • Describe one idea, activity, or game centered on an       important nutrition concept for families to explore. For example, you may       include a healthy recipe book, a recipe to make a healthy snack together,       or a grocery store game.
5. Safety:
   • Describe one idea, activity, or game centered on an       important safety concept for families to explore. For example, you might       include a composition notebook in the backpack and encourage children and       families to draw a picture of something that they do safely or draw a       picture of a safety practice they follow at home.
6. Reference page:
   • One APA citation for a children’s book that you can       include in the backpack for families to read together. In addition to the       citation, please include a summary of the story.
   • One APA citation for a resource that will support families       to learn more about one of the areas. In addition to the citation, please       include a summary of the resource.

Your written assignment should include a page for each of the following: introduction including your name, health activity, wellness activity, nutrition activity, safety activity, and resources (for a total of six pages). You may wish to include a picture of your backpack if you choose to create one. Because this assignment is meant to be useful for your future role, you do not need to submit a title page or a resources page; however, you will need to include references to any materials that you use.

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Applied Ethics
Please read these assignment instructions before writing your paper, and re-read them often during and after the writing process to make sure that you are fulfilling all of the instructions.
Overview
In the Week One Assignment, you chose a concrete moral problem, identified three ethically significant issues that pertain to that problem, and constructed a thesis statement that articulated your position on that problem. In the Week Three Assignment, you discussed either deontological or utilitarian theory, applied that theory to the problem, and raised a relevant objection.
By engaging with the course material, you now have had a chance to refine your thinking and broaden your understanding of the issue by approaching it from the perspective of multiple ethical theories.
In this paper, you will demonstrate what you have learned by writing an essay in which you

• Present a revised thesis statement on the problem you      are discussing.
• Identify, explain, and apply the core principles of at      least two ethical theories to draw specific moral conclusions about the      problem you are discussing.
• Present your own reasoning on the problem you are      discussing and explain which of the ethical theories best supports your      own view on the issues.

Instructions
Write an essay that conforms to the requirements below. The paper must be 1500 to 2000 words in length (excluding the title and reference pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
The paragraphs of your essay should conform to the following guidelines:

1. Introduction (150 to 200      words):
   • Your first paragraph should introduce the topic by       briefly and precisely discussing the concrete problem or question that       you will be addressing, including a brief preview of the ethically       significant issues that make this question important. This should draw       upon your work in the Week One Assignment, but should be more succinct       and reflect the development of your understanding of those ideas throughout       the course.
   • Conclude your introductory paragraph with the revised       statement of your thesis, and a brief description of the primary       reason(s) supporting your position. (If you changed topics, you will need       to repeat the exercises from the Week One Assignment, including using the       Thesis Generator from the Ashford Writing Center. Please see the notes       and guidelines for more on this).
2. Application of Two Ethical      Theories (1000 to 1200 words):
   This section of the Final Paper consists in explaining and applying the      core principles of two ethical theories to the question or problem you      have chosen. One of these theories may be the theory you used in your Week      Three Assignment, but your discussion here should be more refined and must      identify the specific moral conclusions(s) that result when the theory is      applied to the question or problem you are addressing.

   For each of the theories you are considering, you should

   1. Explain the core principles or features of the theory       and the general account of moral behavior it provides.
   2. Explain how these principles or features apply to the       problem or question under consideration and identify the specific moral       conclusion that results when these theories are applied to that problem       or question.
      • A specific moral conclusion        is a statement that takes a moral stance on the issue at hand. For        example, if you’re discussing the question, “Is the death penalty        moral?” a discussion that identifies and applies the core principles of        utilitarian theory might yield the specific conclusion that the death        penalty is moral because it ensures the greatest good for the greatest        number. Applying virtue ethics might conclude that the death penalty        exhibits the vice of cruelty, or a deontological theory might worry that        it fails to treat the criminal as an end-in-itself. (Note: These are        just examples; you may not write on the death penalty, nor is it        necessarily the case that each theory would lead to the conclusion        mentioned).
      • For purpose of this        assignment, it’s best if you explain and apply the core principles of        one theory first, and then turn to the second theory. This section of        the paper should be approximately 1000 to 1200 words (500 to 600 words        for each theory application).
3. Evaluation (150 to 300 words):
   In this section of the paper, you should explain which ethical theory you      think presents the most persuasive moral argument on this question and      why. Then briefly address a common objection to that argument that you      have not yet considered in the main part of your paper, and provide a      concise response to that objection.
   • For example, if you were writing on capital       punishment, you might think that a utilitarian argument that defends       position X is most persuasive. You would then raise an objection against       a utilitarian defense of position X, and defend that view against the       objection.
4. Conclusion (150 to 300 words):
   Provide a conclusion that sums up what you presented in the paper and      offers some final reflections, including a revised statement of the thesis      (do not simply repeat your thesis, but rephrase it in light of the      discussion you just presented).

Resource Requirement:
You must use at least four resources. Two of the resources must be drawn from the list of acceptable resources on each of the two theories you discuss. For example, if you write on deontology and virtue ethics, you would need at least one resource under the “Deontology” list, and at least one resource under the “Virtue Ethics” list. The other two may be from either the Required or Recommended Resources, or from the Ashford University Library.

• If you need help with finding additional resources, or      are unsure about whether a particular resource will count toward the      requirement, please contact your instructor.
• The textbook does not count toward the resource      requirement.
• Cite your sources within the text of your paper and on      the reference page. For information regarding APA, including samples and      tutorials, visit the Ashford Writing Center, located within the Learning Resources      tab on the left navigation toolbar.

Writing the Final Paper
The Final Paper:

1. Must be 1500 to 2000 words in length (excluding title      and reference pages), and formatted according to APA style as outlined in      the Ashford Writing Center.
2. Must include a title page with the following:
   1. Title of paper
   2. Student’s name
   3. Course name and number
   4. Instructor’s name
   5. Date submitted
3. Must begin with an introductory paragraph that has a      succinct thesis statement.
4. Must address the topic of the paper with critical thought.
5. Must end with a conclusion that reaffirms your thesis.
6. Must use at least four resources.
7. Must document all sources in APA style, as outlined in      the Ashford Writing Center.
8. Must include a separate reference page, formatted      according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

36 36 unread replies. 47 47 replies.

Your initial discussion thread is due on Day 5 (Saturday) and you have until Day 7 (Monday) to respond to your classmates. Your grade will reflect both the quality of your initial post and the depth of your responses. Refer to the Discussion Forum Grading Rubric under the Settings icon above for guidance on how your discussion will be evaluated.

Antitrust Law

Review the “AT&T Pulls $39 Billion T-Mobile Bid on Regulatory Opposition (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.” article.

In 2011, AT&T attempted a merger with T-Mobile. The Justice Department sued under the act, claiming that the merger would constitute a violation of the antitrust laws. In 2012, AT&T dropped its attempt at the acquisition.

If AT&T had merged with T-Mobile, would the merger have violated antitrust laws? Why, or why not? Do not be unduly influenced by the Justice Department’s stance on the issue. Use your own analysis to reach a conclusion.

Guided Response: Respond to at least two of your fellow students’ posts in a substantive manner. Some ways to do this include the following, though you may choose a different approach, providing your response is substantive:

Agree or disagree with your classmate’s position. Defend your position by using information from the week’s readings or examples from current events.

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"