HOMEWORK

A)
What negative effects does obesity have on the lifespan development (childhood, adolescence, adulthood, and older adulthood)?

How could engagement in physical activity impact motor competence?

What strategies would you recommend for weight-management in obese children?

Please answer all three questions using complete sentences in 200-250 words. Provide evidence from reading Chapter 12. 

B)

Directions: Please read the Stodden et al. (2008) paper in the Learning Activity folder. Find the illustration of the model discussed in this chapter. Examine the model and identify three relationships among the factors of motor competence, physical activity, weight status, and physical fitness. Please answer the following questions using complete sentences in 200-250 words total. 

1. Are the relationships represented as unidirectional or bidirectional (reciprocal)? Why? Give an example of each relationship. 

2. How does the model represent development? Explain in detail.

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Intervention Case Study

Intervention Case Study

Description of Intervention

[Include in this section a brief overview of the intervention you have selected, based on how it was described in the article. Please do not copy and paste the description from the article—use your own words. Think of this like you are explaining it to your best friend. What does it do, how do you do it, and to whom would it apply? You also want to make sure you are looking for any limitations to the intervention noted in the article or important to consider. Most journal articles will have a limitations section or speak to any considerations you might want to think about before applying it. Others may not have this concretely stated, so you will need to do some analysis and consider to whom the intervention might not be applicable and why. Intervention Case Study. A couple of limitations you are likely to see are that they are relatively new and untested or that they only apply to a specific group of people. Those are great things to consider when selecting an intervention and part of what I want you to get savvy at looking for.]

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER NOW

Rationale

[This section should center on why you have chosen this intervention for the case study. Why is it appropriate to the specific client? You want to use the details of the case study to help you justify the approach based on factors like diagnosis, culture, family dynamics, developmental influences, etc. Remember, the goal in any intervention is to choose one that will be most effective to the needs of the client. To that end, you will really want to consider and speak to the details of the case study and why they tie back to your chosen intervention in this section.]

Explanation of Support

[In this section you will speak to the actual application of the intervention to the case study client. What would it look like when applied to the client from the case study given the details of the article and the description above? This takes your rationale a step further and has you really think about what it would mean to put the case study client in the intervention. This step moves you from why it would be valuable (rationale) to how it would work.]

Future Applications

[This final section is designed to have you consider to whom or under what circumstances you might apply this intervention in the future. How might you use this tool in your toolbox to help you in future work? Intervention Case Study.  Can it apply to more than one type of issue or client? This is where you should consider expansion beyond the particular case study and speak to how you think you will use this intervention to help your future practice.]

References

[Include any references cited in your paper in full APA format. Don’t forget to include in-text citations as well.]

Ilana is a 37-year-old Korean-American female. She presented to therapy four weeks after the sudden
loss of her husband, Eli, and youngest child, Kai, who were killed by a drunk driver on their way home
from Korean school. Ilana’s daughter, Claire, was also in the car at the time of the accident but survived.
Ilana reports that she moves back and forth between periods of shock, denial, and anger and finds
herself “zoning out” many times a day, as if she is watching herself in slow motion. She struggles with
feelings of hopelessness and rage and simultaneously feels the needs to cut off her emotions to protect
and care for her eight-year-old daughter. She worries she is losing control and does not know how she
will continue to manage life without her husband and child.
History
Ilana and Eli were married for 12 years. They met at the local hospital where they were both employed
as nurses. In addition to their passion for nursing, Eli and Ilana bonded over their shared Korean
heritage. Eli was biracial with an Irish mother and Korean father, and Ilana’s family had immigrated to
the United States from Korea when she was two years old. Although both adopted “American lifestyles,”
they both felt a strong cultural connection to their Korean heritage and agreed to raise their children
with an awareness of their Korean roots.
After a several years of marriage, Ilana and Eli had Claire, who was later followed by their son, Kai. Ilana
reported that both she and Eli had been very close to their children and saw their relationship as one of
partners and co-parents. While they preferred to do things together as a family, one of the other of
them would take responsibility for the kids’ activities when the other was on call for work.
On the day of the accident Ilana had been on call, so Eli took Claire and Kai to the Korean-language
school they attended on Saturday mornings. She had been in the process of preparing lunch when she
received a call from the local hospital where Eli still worked. She was told a drunk driver had run a red
light and smashed head-on into the driver’s side of Eli’s car, killing him and Kai instantly. Intervention Case Study. Claire had been
taken to the hospital with a broken leg and some small lacerations.
In the month since the accident Ilana has not been working and has largely been supported by her
parents and sister who live in her same town. They held a Christian funeral for Kai and Eli three days
after the accident, but Ilana claims she has been “unable to do anything” since. She said she often drifts
in and out of functioning and will become angry and full of rage completely out of the blue. She notes
that she is hypervigilant and jumpy, and she has become increasingly protective of Claire, who is
struggling with her own nightmares and distressing memories of the accident. She states that she has
“no idea who [she is] anymore” and does not know how to continue to parent in the aftermath of this
loss.
Developmental Considerations
Ilana had no physical or cognitive delays in childhood. She immigrated to the United States when she
was two years old, and although her family spoke only Korean, she quickly learned English when she
started public education. She maintained average grades throughout school. Ilana was an outgoing child
and made friends easily. She noted no concerns related to psychosocial development.
Relational Considerations
As a child, Ilana was close to both parents and is especially fond of her younger sister, who was born
when Ilana was 10-years old. As a child, Ilana was an outgoing and precocious child who often greeted
others with a laugh and a smile. As she grew older, she maintained her outgoing demeanor despite the
more reserved nature of her Korean-born parents. While there were some inherent conflicts with her
parents about her “American” lifestyle, Ilana felt supported by her parents and remains close to them
today. She also remains close to her younger sister, who moved in with Ilana and Eli when she
graduated from college. Ilana reports strong relationships with coworkers and other parents from her
kids’ school, many of whom have been bringing food and supporting Claire when Ilana felt unable to do
so.
Multicultural Considerations
Ilana’s Korean heritage is of great importance to her. Both of her parents continue to speak
predominantly Korean, so she felt this was an especially important part of raising her own children, and
why she and Eli elected to send their children to Korean-language school.
While Ilana was raised in the Buddhist tradition, she elected to convert to Eli’s protestant Christian
religion before she and Eli married. This was initially a point of contention between Ilana and her
parents, but over time they came to accept Ilana’s decision. In the weeks since Eli and Kai passed away,
Ilana notes that she has struggled with acceptance of what happened and an inability to deal with the
unknown of afterlife. She notes that her parents’ belief in samsara seem to have brought comfort and
peace to them, but she does not feel the same. She reports that she does not know whether to believe
in the heaven of her Christian religion or the reincarnation of her Buddhist upbringing. Intervention Case Study.
Diagnosis
Diagnostically, Ilana presents with symptoms consistent with acute stress disorder with a combination of
negative mood, dissociative symptoms, and arousal symptoms (American Psychiatric Association, 2013).

Clarification of “Intervention” for Rubrics:
Throughout the course of this term, you will be asked to research and select empirically validated
counseling treatment interventions appropriate to the case studies you have been provided. Treatment
interventions are those cognitive, affective, behavioral, and systemic counseling strategies, techniques,
and methods that are specifically implemented in the context of a therapeutic relationship. They should
reflect the specific needs of the client and demonstrate clinical efficacy in addressing the targeted
concern. For the purposes of this course, you will need to find journal articles that specifically target
crisis and trauma interventions demonstrating clinical application to each specific case study. Select
interventions from journal articles published within the past five years to ensure use of the most up-todate resources.
For assistance, consider the following as an example of an appropriate and empirically validated
intervention article for working with clients who have suffered from domestic violence:

Overview: Selection of appropriate resources and interventions for clients who have experienced trauma or crisis involves consideration of biological,
developmental, cultural, and spiritual factors. Your success in treating these clients will depend heavily on a comprehensive assessment of these factors and on
matching an appropriate intervention to the client crisis or trauma experience and to the individual needs of your client.
The first final project for this course is the creation of a trauma toolbox consisting of resources selected from counseling literature that you will use to support
clients who experience symptoms of crisis and trauma. You will review different case studies throughout the course that will introduce you to how to work with
different types of clients.
This assignment represents the second of the case studies and involves identifying a treatment intervention that can be used when working with clients
experiencing bereavement and grief.
Note: You will also submit this assignment to your ePortfolio as part of your final project trauma toolbox in Week Nine. After receiving feedback, you will upload
the paper, including tracked changes that show any revisions or corrections you made, for your final toolbox submission. This is required in order to receive
credit for the final project.
Prompt: Review the Week Five Case Study Ilana document, and then address the following. Be sure to support your responses with research.
 You should NOT use any of the provided weekly resources or the LAPC Model (except in Week Four) for your selected intervention. Instead, please use
empirical research to locate an appropriate intervention specific to the case study. See the Clarification of Intervention document. You may use articles
from the Mental Health Counseling Guide or from other sources, as long as the intervention is grounded in research.
Write a paper that includes the following:
 Provide a brief description of the intervention including:
(1) to whom it can be applied
(2) under what circumstances it can be applied
(3) any limitations to the intervention that should be considered
 Provide rationale for choosing the selected approach for the case study.
 Include an explanation for why selecting that intervention will help your work with the selected case study client, and provide appropriate
support.
 Describe how the intervention can be used in future work when supporting the treatment approaches for clients.
 Provide a link to the intervention within the body of the paper (or upload the PDF) so your instructor can easily identify and reference it. Intervention Case Study. Ensure the link is active and accessible for review by your instructor. Note: If your selected intervention is not accessible, your submission will be
returned to you.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER NOW

 Add the intervention to your ePortfolio.
Rubric
Guidelines for Submission: This short paper should follow the Intervention Paper Template. It should be 2 to 4 pages in length with double spacing, 12-point
Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. All references should be cited in APA format.
Critical Elements Excellent (100%) Proficient (90%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%) Value
Empirically
Validated
Selects empirically validated
intervention
Does not select empirically
validated intervention
10
Description Meets “Proficient” criteria, and
description is detailed and
demonstrates exceptional insight
or analysis
Briefly describes intervention and
includes to whom it can be
applied, under what
circumstances, and any limitations
Briefly describes intervention, but
description contains gaps or
inaccuracies or lacks detail
Does not describe intervention 18.75
Rationale Meets “Proficient” criteria, and
rationale is detailed and
demonstrates exceptional insight
or analysis substantiated by
learning and scholarly resources
Provides rationale for selecting
the intervention and reflects the
appropriateness of fit to the
selected case study
Provides rationale for selecting
the intervention, but rationale
contains gaps or inaccuracies or
lacks detail, or the intervention is
not appropriate to the selected
case study
Does not provide rationale for
selecting the intervention
18.75
Explanation of
Support
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and
explanation is detailed and
demonstrates exceptional insight
or analysis substantiated by
learning and scholarly resources
Explains how the selected
intervention will provide
appropriate support to the case
study client
Explains how the selected
intervention will provide
appropriate support to the case
study client, but explanation
contains gaps or inaccuracies or
lacks detail
Does not explain how the selected
intervention will provide
appropriate support to client
18.75
Future
Application
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and
description of future application is
detailed and demonstrates
exceptional insight or analysis
Describes how the intervention
can be used in future work when
supporting the treatment
approaches for clients
Describes how the intervention
can be used in future work when
supporting the treatment
approaches for clients, but
description contains gaps or
inaccuracies or lacks detail
Does not describe how the
intervention can be used in future
work when supporting the
treatment approaches for clients
18.75
Link to or PDF of
Resource
Provides an active link to or PDF of
the intervention
Does not provide an active link to
or PDF of the intervention, or
intervention is not accessible
10
Critical Elements Excellent (100%) Proficient (90%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%) Value
Articulation of
Response
Submission has no major errors
related to grammar, spelling,
syntax, or organization
Submission has some errors
related to grammar, spelling,
syntax, or organization but they
are minimal and do not negatively
impact readability and articulation
of main ideas
Submission has major errors
related to grammar, spelling,
syntax, or organization that
negatively impact readability and
articulation of main ideas
Submission has critical errors
related to grammar, spelling,
syntax, or organization that
prevent understanding of ideas. Intervention Case Study.

  

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

HOMEWORK

Curriculum Development Issue Paper

Details:

Read “Reconceptualizing Program Outcomes” and “Leveling EBP Content for Undergraduate Nursing Students” for a better understanding of issues within curriculum development.

Select an issue within curriculum development that is of interest to you.

Write a paper of 1,000-1,250 words on the issue, discussing its affect and relevance to nursing, staff or patient education.

  1. Why is this issue a problem at your place of employment?
  2. What are your proposed strategies to resolve these issues?
  3. Use at least three to five scholarly, peer-reviewed resources less than 5 years old in addition to the course materials. Make sure that you do not use the two sources given in this assignment.
 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

HOMEWORK

By Day 3

Post an explanation of how dominant groups can play a role in marginalizing other groups based on racial and ethnic characteristics. Discuss the potential negative impact of a dominant culture on immigrants and refugees, such as Aaron. How might racism and prejudice impact his assimilation? Furthermore, explain how you would respond to Aaron when he discusses his family’s rejection of his desire to maintain his cultural roots. In your explanation, identify specific skills you would employ as a multiculturally sensitive social worker.

By Day 5

Respond to at least two colleagues with a critique of their analysis. Explain multicultural considerations your colleagues would need to keep in mind in their social work practice. Specifically, explain how marginalized racial and ethnic groups identified in your colleagues’ posts might perpetuate a marginalized group status. Explain how a marginalized group may identify and adopt the norms of a dominant group. Finally, explain the implications for social work practice.

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

The Tyranny of Diagnosis: Specific Entities and Individual Experience Paper

The Tyranny of Diagnosis: Specific Entities and Individual Experience Paper

Rosenberg, Charles 2007 Chapter 2 “The Tyranny of Diagnosis: Specific Entities and Individual Experience” of Our Present Complaint: American Medicine, Then and Now. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 13-37

http://libgen.gs/ads.php?md5=255678447a7ae151108301a66078a9ed

Kleinman, Arthur 1988 The Illness Narratives: Suffering, Healing, and the Human Condition. New York: Basic Books.

http://libgen.gs/ads.php?md5=591392119fa6d361644ea4db98008f13

just press get

What are the author’s main arguments? – What are the author’s key examples and evidence? – What are the structure and style of the text like, and how do these relate to the argument? – Who are the author’s key interlocutors? The Tyranny of Diagnosis: Specific Entities and Individual Experience Paper. – How does the text engage key aspects of anthropological theory (e.g., social structure, the nature of experience), and how do these aspects compare to concepts that we have read in other texts? As you are reading, you should be answering the above questions in your own notes. This will help you to write a synthetic commentary for your paper. This is your first attempt at bringing together the week’s material, and should be a springboard for class discussion. In your commentary, you might choose to consider the following types of responses.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER NOW

Discuss a passage that has you puzzled, and walk the class through the problem. That is, do not state only that you are confused, but rather point out the precise place in the text that you find confusing, why it is confusing, and its textual/conceptual antecedents. – Identify and explicate what you see to be a contradiction in the text. That is, do not state only that the author is contradicting herself, but rather explain the precise aspects of the passages/concepts/interpretations that seem contradictory to you. – Compare/contrast/relate some aspect of one author’s work to the work of another. While it is fine to occasionally refer to texts outside of this course, the bulk of discussion should focus on our common reading. When referring to outside texts, describe the text and its argument/evidence clearly and concisely so the rest can follow your comparison – Relate an event in the world to the text. – Follow up on/explicate an author’s citation of someone else. – Trace a pattern among key terms. Although it is a first attempt at synthesis, it should be well-written, proofread, and cited. Citations should follow AAA (Chicago) style. Because these papers are short, they must be concise. Make sure you are writing clearly and efficiently. The Tyranny of Diagnosis: Specific Entities and Individual Experience Paper.

Weekly reading synthesis: The weekly papers will consist of no more than three and no less than two full pages of analysis/synthesis of the week’s readings. The papers will allow students to concisely interrogate concepts or themes from the course. The goal of these papers is to summarize the most important points of the authors and to place them in dialogue with other readings from our course. The only way to get full credit for these papers is to demonstrate an understanding of the readings and how they connect with the each other and the course content as a whole. The lowest weekly summary grade will be dropped. Summary papers are due every Monday. Late submissions are strongly discouraged and may receive partial credit. The papers should have a logical structure and must have proper grammar and punctuation. They should be typed in MSWord, double-spaced, in a standard 12pt font, with all outside sources properly cited using AAA/Chicago Manual style. The Tyranny of Diagnosis: Specific Entities and Individual Experience Paper. 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

HOMEWORK

We started our journey into critical thinking by recognizing and  admitting that much of our thinking is flawed, biased, and downright  wrong (scary isn’t it?)!  We further saw that the consequences of  limited and restrained thinking permeates and greatly limits every  aspect of how we define others, ourselves, and the world at large.

We further examined some of the realities of egocentric thinking  (e.g., It’s true because….I believe it, …we believe it, ….I want to  believe it, etc.).  We often tend to believe that the world revolves  around us and that other perspectives are at best less valuable than our  own.  Let me provide you a personal example of what I am talking  about.  Growing up, I was raised in a working class household, attended  conservative churches, and hung out with opinionated friends.  I lived a  sheltered life and had few life experiences.  I believed that many of  the world’s most complex and controversial issues were black and white:  Clearly right or wrong depending on MY view of the issue!  I was an  expert on everything.  I could not only provide people with answers to  questions they might have, I had THE answer to those questions.  Because  of numerous changes in my personal life relatively recently (life  experiences, teaching, extensive world travel, an increased willingness  to unbiasedly learn about others, etc.), I no longer believe this and  indeed strongly feel that many of my preconceived values and beliefs  were way off base once I was willing to be objective in my views.  I was  under the impression that I was a critical thinker; looking at the  evidence that was impossible.  Looking back at it, I was anything but a  critical thinker.  Through much work, I have worked towards becoming a  true critical thinker.  Though I sense I have made much progress, I can  hardly say I am a polished critical thinker; I still have much work to  do!

***************************************ASSIGNMENT BELOW**************************************************

First, consider if YOU are truly a  critical thinker.  Do you meet the standards of critical thinking listed  under the result section on the “Why critical thinking” page of your  booklet?  Do YOU adhere to any of the “It’s true statements…” listed  on the “Problem of egocentric thinking” page?  Are YOU truly a critical  thinker or do you simply want to believe that you are?  Is it a good  thing to be a critical thinker?  If yes, why?  If no, why not?

Second, please thoughtfully and thoroughly read the “Universal  Intellectual Standards” pages in your booklet and provide us your  thoughts and feelings.  Furthermore, discuss which universal  intellectual standard listed you believe is the most difficult to apply  to critical thinking?  Why?

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

HOMEWORK

To Prepare:

  • Read the articles by Sikka, Morath, & Leape (2015); Crabtree, Brennan, Davis, & Coyle (2016); and Kim et al. (2016) provided in the Resources.
  • Reflect on how EBP might impact (or not impact) the Quadruple Aim in healthcare.
  • Consider the impact that EBP may have on factors impacting these quadruple aim elements, such as preventable medical errors or healthcare delivery.

To Complete:

Write a brief analysis (no longer than 2 pages) of the connection between EBP and the Quadruple Aim.

Your analysis should address how EBP might (or might not) help reach the Quadruple Aim, including each of the four measures of:

  • Patient experience
  • Population health
  • Costs
  • Work life of healthcare providers
 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

ASSIGNMENT

Activity 1, Activity 2, etc. 

Activity 1

As you read chapter 6 of your text, reflect on your own writing skills. How did you learn how to write? In your response, briefly describe your writing strengths and weaknesses and then describe the steps you plan to take to bolster your strengths and turn around your weaknesses. Be specific.

Activity 2

Conduct a brief internet search and locate a piece of business writing. Be sure to provide a link to the page for us. Develop and share your in-depth analysis of the writing using the 8 Elements of Communication discussed in chapter 4 of the text.

References.

. Once you reach this link, scroll down to the middle of the page to locate these six brief articles.

http://www.criticalthinking.org/pages/college-and-university-students/799

 

  • Becoming a Critic of Your Thinking
  • Glossary of Critical Thinking Terms
  • Universal Intellectual Standards
  • Valuable Intellectual Traits
  • Distinguishing Between Inferences and Assumptions
  • Thinking with Concepts

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

HOMEWORK

CSCI 450 Computer Architecture Report
Topics

  1. FPGA
  2. RISC-V
  3. High Performance Computing (HPC) architectures
  4. Security microarchitectures and related vulnerabilities
    Expectations
  5. Choose a topic from the above list
  6. Read relevant paper(s) on the topic
  7. Write a technical report demonstrating your understanding of the paper(s)
  8. Submit the report by the deadline
    Requirements
    To help prepare you for writing technical documents in the future, you will write your project
    paper in a simplified ACM format with one column, fully justified text. The simplified ACM template is
    provided on myleoonline in the project module. Your report should be approximately 5-6 pages,
    mimicking a research paper. Your report will basically contain the following sections (which can be
    adjusted depending on what you are reporting on)*
    • Abstract or executive summary: 100-200 words describing what has been done and results.
    • Introduction: This section includes a longer summary of what has been done, main observations
    and results. The report introduction should briefly discuss how the used techniques are different
    from previous work on the topic.
    • Background/Related work: This section includes summaries of previous related work including
    references to the papers and other resources you needed to explore to fully understand the
    topic you are reporting on. Include references to these resources in the references section. In
    this section, you should aim to describe how the work you are reporting on is different and how
    it improves and/or extends previous methods. This section could be included in the
    • Methodology: Describe your understanding of the main contributions of the topic you are
    reporting on: what was done, how it was done, how it works, etc. Provide architectural
    diagrams, charts, and figures where necessary with proper citation.
    • Experiment Results/Observations: Depending on the topic you are reporting on, you may need
    to include a description of the experimental setup (if included in the original paper you are
    reviewing). Aim to be concise and utilize graphs to show any improvements. Include a summary
    of results analysis: what the results mean and the trends that are revealed.
    • Conclusions and Future Work: Include here a summary of the work and results. Include
    any future work that is expected or could be done.
    • Acknowledgments (Optional): Acknowledge any person that helped with your research that is
    not listed as an author.
    • References: List of papers and resources cited throughout your report.
    You should compose the report using your own words: do not directly copy from the
    material of the paper you are reporting on. In the case that you quote the words of the
    original authors, use quotation marks “ ” and add a reference number. If you cite any
    work other than the provided paper, you should use a standard citation format. Please
    maintain the template format in terms of font type, size, line spacing and page margins.
    Grading Criteria
    Report structure: 10% Follow the template as is
    Report content: 70% Report content showcasing your understanding of the
    original author’s ideas. How you explain the paper’s ideas
    clearly (You do not have to explain every detail).
    Report quality: 20% Grammar, sentence construction, coherency
    Other Guidelines
    • You need to submit the report in both PDF and MS Word format.
    • Any report that is corrupted and/or cannot be opened will receive zeropoints.
    • Reportsthat fail plagiarismcheck will receive zero points.
    • Late submission will result in 25% penalty for every day you are late.
    • If you have any questions, contact the instructor or the GA immediately.
 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Healthcare Technology Research Paper

Healthcare Technology Research Paper

Required Resources
Read/review the following resources for this activity:

  • Textbook: Chapters 7, 8
  • Lesson
  • Minimum of 2 scholarly source (in addition to the textbook)
  • Narrated PowerPoint Tutorial (Make sure to review this tutorial before you begin recording.)

Instructions
For this week’s assignment respond to one of the following options, and include Option 1, 2, or 3 as part of your heading.

Option 1: The first option is to name and describe in detail a key specific and recent healthcare technology. What are at least two key moral problems this technology creates? What are the proper moral guidelines for dealing with it in your view? Compare your approach to what an utilitarian and ethical egoist would say (each independently).

Option 2: In the second option, name and describe in detail a key specific and recent social technology. What are at least two key moral problems this technology creates? What are the proper moral guidelines for dealing with it in your view? Compare your moral approach to what an utilitarian and social contract ethicist would say (each independently). Healthcare Technology Research Paper.

Option 3: John Doe, Patient One,  is in late stage of kidney disease. If he does not receive a new kidney, then he is predicted to die within a week. Doe is 45, single, and has no children. Doctors theorize that Doe damaged his kidney by not following a low-salt diet. Doe inherited one million dollars and is known for giving money to charity. Without a transplant, he will probably be forced to spend all his money searching for a kidney outside of the usual legal channels.  Patient Two is Jane Doe (no relation to John). Patient Two is a mother of two children (ages 21 and 24). She is divorced and 55 years old. She developed kidney problems due to eating a high-fat and high-sugar diet. If she does not receive a kidney within one month, doctors believe she will die.  Patient Three is an orphan. This orphan lives in a state facility. She was born with a genetic condition that constantly damages her kidney. The only known approach to her condition is to provide her with a kidney transplant every so often. She is 11 and has already undergone two kidney transplants. She will perish in two months if she does not receive another transplant.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER NOW

All three patients are at the same hospital. The hospital only has one kidney to give out. The orphan’s birth parents were known to be of a religion that is opposed to organ donation. Healthcare Technology Research Paper. The other patients come from religions that do not oppose organ donation.  Who should get the kidney?  Why should that candidate receive it over the others? Devise a course of social action and a solution for this case by using the ethics of egoism and then utilitarianism to a key moral conflict involving health care in this case. Appraise the interests of diverse populations (in terms  of ethnicity, race, religion, sexual orientation, etc.) and how they relate to the case.

For all the options:

Cite the textbook and incorporate outside sources, including citations.

You should not be using any text you used in a discussion board or assignment for this class or any previous class.

You will submit all of the following:

  • A written report that presents one of the options above (Be sure to give equal time to each element.)
  • An oral presentation that summarizes the report and examines the ethical ideas beyond the particulars of each case.
  • The link or a scan of the article mentioning the health technology, social technology, or case you are reporting on. If you made up the case, please indicate that in your report.

You should not be using any text you used in a discussion board or assignment for this class or any previous class.

Cite the textbook and incorporate outside sources, including citations.

Writing Requirements (APA format)

  • Length: 3-4 pages (not including title page or references page)
  • 1-inch margins
  • Double spaced
  • 12-point Times New Roman font
  • Title page
  • References page (minimum of 2 scholarly sources)

Presentation Requirements

  • Length: 2-3 minutes

Grading
This activity will be graded based on the Assignment Grading Rubric. Healthcare Technology Research Paper. 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"