HOMEWORK

Assume that you recently graduated with an MBA degree and have just landed a job as a financial planner with Henry’s Investment Inc. Your first assignment is to create a portfolio for a client by selecting two stocks on the market.

  1. You need to complete the below table by selecting ANY two stocks (except for Microsoft) on Nasdaq and collect the data on Dec 31 each year (or the last trading day in that year):
                Company 1’s Name              Company 2’s NameNasdaq Composite Includes Dividends
YearStock Price  Dividend (paid in the last quarter as of the year)Stock PriceDividend (paid in the last quarter as of the year)
2019     
2018     
2017     
2016     
2015     
2014     
  • Use the data you have collected to calculate annual returns for Company 1, Company 2, and the Market Index, and then calculate average returns over the five-year period.  Give comments on your calculation results. Which stock has a higher return?
  • Calculate the standard deviation of the returns for Company 1, Company 2, and the Market Index. Do you think the standard deviation can reflect the stocks’ risks? And why?
  • Construct a scatter diagram graph that shows Company 1’s and Company 2’s returns on the vertical axis and the Market Index’s returns on the horizontal axis.  What’s the relationship between the two stocks from your observation?
  • Estimate or use data to find Company 1’s and Company 2’s betas,  as the slopes of regression lines with stock returns on the vertical axis (y-axis) and market return on the horizontal axis (x-axis).  Are these betas consistent with your graph? Do you think beta can reflect the stocks’ risks? And why?
  • You need to determine the risk-free rate.  What will be your approach and why do you select this method? How much the rate will be?
  • What’s the market risk premium? Assume that the market risk premium is 5.5%.  What is the expected return on the market?  Use the SML equation to calculate the two companies’ required returns.
  • If you formed a portfolio that consisted of 50% Company 1 stock and 50% Company 2 stock, what would be its beta and its required return? How will the portfolio hedge the risk?
  • Suppose an investor wants to include any one of the two stocks that you recommended in his or her portfolio.  Stocks A, B, and C are currently in the portfolio, and their betas are 0.869, 1.985, and 1.02, respectively.  Recommend a stock from the two stocks you’ve selected to her/him and calculate the new portfolio’s required return if it consists of 25% of the company you’ve recommended, 15% of Stock A, 40% of Stock B, and 20% of Stock C. Give your comments to risk of the new portfolio. Do you recommend it or not? And why?

Question 2: WACC Estimation (the questions was referenced and revised from Financial Management textbook of Nelson Publishing)

The balance sheet for Aurora Equipment Implements Inc is provided below along with other selected financial data.

Balance Sheet as at December 31, 2020 ($ millions)

Cash$10     Accounts payable$10
Accounts Receivable20     Accruals10
Inventory20     Short term debt5
Total current assets50     Total current liabilities25
    
        Long-term debt20
    
Plant and equipment (net)38     Preferred stock                        3
       Common equity10
       Retained earnings30
Total Assets$88     Total liabilities and equity$88
    

The facts given:

  1. Short term debt consists of bank loans that currently cost 10%, with interest payable quarterly. These loans are used to finance receivables and inventories in a seasonal basis, so in the off-season, bank loans are zero.
  2. The long term debts consist of 20-years, semi-annual payment mortgage bond with a coupon rate of 8%. Currently these bonds provide a yield to investors of rd=7%. Of new bonds were sold, they would yield investors 7%.
  3. The firms’ perpetual preferred stock has a $25 par value, pays a quat4rly dividend of $0.45, and has a yield to investors of 6.5%. New perpetual preferred would have to provide the dame yield to investors and the company would incur a 5% flotation cost to sell them.
  4. The company has 4 million shares of common stock outstanding. P0=$20, but the stock has recently traded in the range od $17 to $23. D0=$1 and EPS0=$2. ROE based om average equity was 24% in 2015, but management expects to increase this return on equity to 30%; however security analysists are nor aware of management’s optimism in this regards.
  5. Betas, as reported by security analyst, range from 1.7 to 1.7; the government bond rate is 5%. Brokerage house reports forecast growth rate in the range of 4% to 8% over the forecastable future. However, some analysis does not explicitly forecast growth rates, but they indicate to their clients that they expect Aurora’s historical trends. As shown in the table in fact (9), to continue.
  6. At a recent conferences, Aurora’s financial vice president polled some pension fund investment managers on the minimum rate of return they would have to expect pm Aurora’s common to make them willing to buy the common rather than Aurora bonds, when the bonds yield 7%. The responses suggested a risk premium over Aurora bonds of 3 to 5 percentage points.
  7. Aurora in in the 30% tax bracket.
  8. Aurora principal investment banker, J&J Company predicts a decline in interest rats, with rd falling to 6% and the government bond rate to 4%, although J&J acknowledge that an increase in the expected inflation rare could lead to an increase rather than a decrease in rates.
  9. Here is the historical record of EPS and DPS.
YearEPSDPSYearEPSDPS
2006$0.09$0.002014$0.78$0.00
2007-0.20.0020150.800.00
20080.400.0020161.200.20
20090.520.0020170.950.40
20100.100.0020181.300.60
20110.570.0020191.600.80
20120.610.0020202.001.00
20130.700.00   

Assume that you are a recently hired financial analysist and that your boss, the treasurer, has asked you to estimate the company’s WACC. Assume no new equity will be issues. Your cost of capital should be appropriate for use in evaluating projects that are in the same risk class as the firm’s average assets now on the books.

Write a report including the overall WACC calculation ( 4marks) , the rational of WACC different  (2 marks), approaches in estimating equity costs different  (2 marks), the common mistakes people make when estimating WACC , the pros and cons (2 marks),, and give your comments on Aurora’s capital structure(2 marks).

The data source and reference must be in APA format.

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Discussion: Clinical Supervision – Kaltura

Discussion: Clinical Supervision – Kaltura

Substance use disorders are complicated psychiatric and medical conditions that involve physical addiction as well as psychological or emotional dependence. Substance use disorders are some of the most difficult to treat. It takes a great deal of patience on the part of the provider and the client. It may take several attempts before a client is successfully able to “kick the habit.” Your guidance and patience can help the client to persevere through difficult times during the journey to recovery.

Clinical Supervision is an essential component of your development as a psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner. It provides an opportunity for professional collaboration as you share experiences with and gain insights from colleagues. For this Clinical Supervision, consider a client with a substance abuse disorder whom you do not think is adequately progressing according to expected clinical outcomes.Discussion: Clinical Supervision – Kaltura

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Learning Objectives
Students will:
  • Analyze clients presenting for treatment of substance-related and addictive disorders
  • Evaluate effectiveness of therapeutic approaches for clients diagnosed with substance-related and addictive disorders
  • Recommend treatment plans

To prepare for this Discussion:

  • Review this week’s Learning Resources concerning treating patients with substance-related and addictive disorders.
  • Reflect on a client you are currently counseling or have previously counseled at your practicum site who has been diagnosed with substance-related and addictive disorders.

By Day 3

Post a 3- to 5-minute Kaltura video in which you do the following:

  • Describe the client. Note: Do not use the client’s actual name.
  • Explain your therapeutic approach with the client, including the perceived effectiveness of your approach.
  • Identify any additional information about this client that may potentially impact expected outcomes.
  • Provide specific recommendations for the client to help them in determining why they are not progressing and what your suggested treatment plan consists of. It is useful to consult the Prochaska and DiClement model.

Discussion: Clinical Supervision – Kaltura 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

HOMEWORK

STUDY GUIDE 6: ENERGY METABOLISM AND WEIGHT CONTROL

Directions. Using Chapters 7, 8, and 9 of your textbook as a reference, answer the following questions. Please include the questions with your answers. Be sure to put your name on your document. Your answers should be thoughtful, complete, and in Standard English. Credit will not be given for answers copied from online sources.

2. Your friend Tiffany is taking a nutrition course at another local community college. She is having difficulty understanding the unit about the energy yielding pathways of carbohydrate, protein, and fat. Help her by discussing how the basic units of carbohydrate, protein, and fat are utilized in energy pathways to produce energy. Be thorough. Include their differences and similarities? 

3. Tina W. is a 44 year old white female who has tried a number of weight-loss programs to include very strict diets. She has never exercised in her previous weight loss attempts. She takes several cardiac medications, none of which she can remember. She is 5’9” and weighs 195 pounds. Her lowest body weight was 135 pounds, when she was 30 years old. (She was able to maintain that weight for two years.) Her blood pressure is high, at 160/90. Tina mentioned that she tried numerous diets as a teenager when she weighed 170 pounds for 3 years. 

a. Using the formulae  in your text book, calculate Tina’s:

1. BMR (Hint: Be sure to read note b in the BMR column of Table 8-1). What is the meaning of your calculation?

2. Estimated Energy Requirements. Assume a sedentary activity level. What is the meaning of your calculation?

Show your work for both questions. 

b. What types of exercise would you be likely to discuss with Tina? 

c. What would be the goals of her treatment? 

4. Determine your BMI. Is your BMI in a healthy range? If not, why not? Do you believe that measuring body fat percentage may more accurately reflect your body composition? Briefly discuss each body composition measure (e.g. skinfold calipers, bioelectrical impedance analysis, etc.) and discuss why measuring body fat is important in assessing a client’s overall health status. 

5. Select one fad diet from any popular publication or online source. Using the ‘How To H9-1’ Box for Identifying a Fad Diet or Other Weight-Loss Scam (Highlight 9, page 291) of your textbook, evaluate the diet. 

6. List and briefly explain the four main components of energy expenditure?

7. Kristin B. , like many Americans is overweight. Kristin is 43-year-old and a mother of two. She has gained 40 pounds since the birth of her youngest child five years ago. She is 64 inches tall and weighs 170 pounds with a BMI of 29.2. Her waist circumference is 37 inches. Kristin can’t figure out why it is so hard to lose weight and keep it off. 

Kristin decides something must be wrong with her to be such a dieting failure. Maybe she just doesn’t have sufficient willpower or maybe she has abnormal metabolism. She feels tired most of the time and has very little energy. She is very busy with her children and has a demanding job as a middle school teacher. Kristin tries to cook healthy meals for her family but is often too tired or stressed to bother, so she stops to get some fast food on her way home. To make matters worse, her seven year-old son recently came home from school and said the kids were teasing him for being fat.

Kristin’s father recently died from complications of type 2 diabetes. At her last medical checkup, her blood pressure was mildly elevated but all of her laboratory blood tests were normal.

Kristin decides it is time to make some changes for her entire family but she doesn’t know quite where to start. She hopes she can help her son by finding a diet that works for him. Complicating the problem is the fact that Kristin’s husband doesn’t have a weight problem. Knowing that you are studying nutrition, Kristin decides to ask you for advice.

a. Based on her health history and physical measurements, describe how you would determine the seriousness of Kristin’s weight gain in relation to her health. 

b. Using the information in chapter 9, what would you estimate to be a reasonable amount of weight for Kristin to lose over the next six months? 

c. What are some advantages for Kristin of keeping a food and exercise record? What other habits besides food intake and physical activity may be especially useful for Kristin to record?  

d. You advise Kristin to limit her daily caloric intake to 1,400 kcalories. Use Table 9-3 to plan one day of meals and snacks to meet her nutritional needs within this calorie levelUse the chart below (one row is already completed): 

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Developing a Culture of Evidence-Based Practice

Developing a Culture of Evidence-Based Practice

As your EBP skills grow, you may be called upon to share your expertise with others. While EBP practice is often conducted with unique outcomes in mind, EBP practitioners who share their results can both add to the general body of knowledge and serve as an advocate for the application of EBP.

In this Discussion, you will explore strategies for disseminating EBP within your organization, community, or industry. Developing a Culture of Evidence-Based Practice

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

To Prepare:

  • Review the Resources and reflect on the various strategies presented throughout the course that may be helpful in disseminating effective and widely cited EBP.
    • This may include: unit-level or organizational-level presentations, poster presentations, and podium presentations at organizational, local, regional, state, and national levels, as well as publication in peer-reviewed journals.
  • Reflect on which type of dissemination strategy you might use to communicate EBP.

Post at least two dissemination strategies you would be most inclined to use and explain why. Explain which dissemination strategies you would be least inclined to use and explain why. Identify at least two barriers you might encounter when using the dissemination strategies you are most inclined to use. Be specific and provide examples. Explain how you might overcome the barriers you identified. Developing a Culture of Evidence-Based Practice 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Discussion 2- Birthright to US Citizenship

Discussion 2- Birthright to US Citizenship

Debate Topic:  Should Children of Undocumented Immigrants Have a  Birthright to US Citizenship?  Research this topic and discuss two (2)  supporting arguments for both the affirmative side and the negative  sides of the argument (the initial post must be made by March 4, 2021).   Then respond to two classmates post addressing the holes (weakness) in  their arguments for either the affirmative or negative sides.  A book of  readings of the argument is available in the Valencia West Campus   library on reserves (Taking Sides).  In addition, Opposing Viewpoints  are available in the library database online.  Please include at least  two sources using APA format.  Due March 21, 2020 due to Spring Break  week.

What Makes A Good Discussion Post?

• Substantial–thoughtful, original, relevant and contributes to the  overall learning of the group (here are some tips on Giving and  Receiving Feedback)Discussion 2- Birthright to US Citizenship

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

• Thought-provoking–stimulates thinking and reasoning

• Timely–post early to give your peers time to respond, this contributes to a rich discussion

• Logical, concise, and grammatical

Debate Topic:  Should Children of Undocumented Immigrants Have a  Birthright to US Citizenship?  Research this topic and discuss two (2)  supporting arguments for both the affirmative side and the negative  sides of the argument (the initial post must be made by March 4, 2021).   Then respond to two classmates post addressing the holes (weakness) in  their arguments for either the affirmative or negative sides.  A book of  readings of the argument is available in the Valencia West Campus   library on reserves (Taking Sides).  In addition, Opposing Viewpoints  are available in the library database online.  Please include at least  two sources using APA format.  Due March 21, 2020 due to Spring Break  week.

What Makes A Good Discussion Post?

• Substantial–thoughtful, original, relevant and contributes to the  overall learning of the group (here are some tips on Giving and  Receiving Feedback)

• Thought-provoking–stimulates thinking and reasoning

• Timely–post early to give your peers time to respond, this contributes to a rich discussion

• Logical, concise, and grammatical Discussion 2- Birthright to US Citizenship 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

HOMEWORK

Choose two of the  “puzzles” that Dr. Gushee shared with us and using either his own definition (above) or principles of deontology, virtue theory, and/or utilitarianism, write a reflective response to the questions posed in Dr. Gushee’s puzzles. You may support your response with our textbook (chapters available on Canvas), the Bible, or other sources, but please cite the information you use in support of your response. Your response should be a minimum of 1 pages (no more than 3), so please be concise, but also frame a logical, coherent response.  Do NOT retype the puzzles; just state the puzzle number in your opening paragraph. 

Several of his 17 “puzzles” are listed below and appear on pp. 33-36 of his book.

 1. Does the elevation of “each and every human being” to special dignity and rank require or imply a denigration of other species? How does this old-new Christian tradition of human life’s sacredness relate to the value of other forms of life? Can it be sustained alongside proper valuing of God’s creation and its other species?

 2. Is the focus of “the sacredness of human life” on the human individual, community or species? Or even some aspect of the individual, such as the human body, the human spirit, or even the human “personality” or human “potential”?

 3. What does it mean to say that the sacredness of human life applies “without exception in all circumstances”? Does this include the developing human in the womb? The embryo in the lab? The human being lingering in a persistent vegetative state? 

4. What does it mean to say that human beings are “incalculably” precious? Is this the same as “infinite” or “immeasurable”? Can any kind of “price” be put on a human life? Are some human lives ever “worth” more than others?

 5. What exactly makes human life so precious and sacred? Is it some quality, capacity, or particular set of characteristics that (most) humans have? Is it possible for a human being to lose whatever characteristics or qualities make him or her worthy of the designation “sacred”? 

6. Does human behavior matter at all to ascribing sacredness to someone? Can a human being behave in such as way as to forfeit his or her sacredness? Or at least forfeit the respect and protection that goes with that status, as defined here? Does the mass murderer or perpetrator of genocide still hold sacred worth?

7. The definition never uses the word “person.” Can there ever be a difference between a “human being” and a “person”? What about the distinction that is sometimes drawn between “potential” and “actual” human beings and/or persons?

8. Is it possible to specify minimum and maximum obligations to human beings?  “Respect” sounds so minimal in comparison with “reverence.”  Are some human beings worthy of respect and others of reverence?  Could different obligations be related to different relationships, such as the differences between a parent-child relationship and that of two strangers on a subway?


9. The definition speaks of protecting human life from “wanton destruction” but does not say “killing” or “destruction of an innocent human being.” Does belief in the sacredness of human life require rejection of any and all violence?

 10. These claims are grounded in divine revelation, Scripture, and Christ.  But what weight can they carry for those who do not accept such authorities? Could the ethic survive if it were retrofitted back to the analytical definition and stripped of all the religious language and authority? Could secular people embrace at least the spirit of this ethic? As a matter of historical fact, have they done so? Does secularization of this ethic change it in any fundamental way?

11. Christians have purportedly received this moral obligation through ancient divine revelation. How have they done with it? Have they always recognized and lived by it? What has gone right, and what has gone wrong in their effort to advance life’s sacredness? What can history tell us?

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

HOMEWORK

Capstone Project Milestone 1: Practice Issue and Evidence Summary Guidelines

Purpose

Clear identification of the practice issue is the first step in evidence-based nursing. Next, the evidence is reviewed to determine the best intervention to change practice outcomes. Completion of the milestone will include identification of the practice issue using the ACE Star Model of Knowledge Transformation and a review of the evidence that will support an intervention that will change outcomes. The evidence summary will be conducted through the ‘breaking down’ of a systematic review on your topic for your change project.

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

  • CO4: Develops and outlines a scientific, systematic decision-making process to integrate critical thinking with clinical judgment to assure safe and effective outcomes. (PO4)
  • CO8: Selects evidence for best practice when planning professional nursing care for individuals, families, aggregates, and communities. (PO8)

Due Dates

Milestone 1 consists of the completion of ONE form with two worksheets called the Practice Issue and Evidence Summary Worksheets. (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. Complete both worksheets 

Practice Issue Worksheet Directions

  1. A tutorial with tips for completing this assignment may be viewed at https://atge.webex.com/atge/ldr.php?RCID=4905b26a67572323c11b839e3251c96a (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
  2. Choose the ONE systematic review topic that is of most interest to you, or most relevant to your practice situation, from the List of Approved Systematic Reviews (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..
  3. Follow the grading criteria below to formulate your practice issue, which must be based on the topic of the systematic review you have selected.
  4. Use the worksheet to document the practice issue presented and approved by your instructor in the Week 2 Discussions.
  5. Your practice issue will be the same for all three Milestone assignments in this course.
  6. Please type your answers directly into the worksheet.

Evidence Summary Worksheet Directions

  1. Develop an evidence summary by following the grading criteria below.
  2. Document this on the evidence summary portion of the worksheet.
  3. You will use this worksheet to incorporate your evidence summary into your Week 4 Milestone 2 assignment.
  4. Please type your answers directly into the worksheet.
 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

HOMEWORK

Purpose

This assignment provides a learning activity for students to demonstrate understanding of quantitative and qualitative research, the purpose and importance of designs, and how research is critical for creating a credible evidence-based nursing practice. 

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following Course Outcomes.

CO1: Examine the sources of evidence that contribute to professional nursing practice. (PO 7)

CO2: Apply research principles to the interpretation of the content of published research studies. (POs 4 & 8)

CO5: Recognize the role of research findings in evidence-based practice. (POs 7 & 8)

Due Date

Submit the completed assignment paper by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 5.

Points

This assignment is worth 225 points.

Directions for Preparing the Scholarly Paper

1. Read each of these instructions.

2. Read the assignment grading rubric criteria.

3. This assignment is completed as an APA paper. APA resources can be found in your Resources Tab. You are required to complete the paper using the productivity tools required by University, which is Microsoft Office Word 2013 (or later version), or Windows and Office 2011 (or later version) for MAC. You must save the file in the “.docx” format. Do NOT save as Word Pad. 

4. You are required to use the grading rubric criteria to ensure you are meeting all grading requirements of the paper.

5. The guideline below is a recommended outline only and does not substitute for your assignment grading rubric; your paper will be graded using the assignment grading rubric criteria. The bolded words below should be used as the headings for your paper. The title of your paper should be: 
Research Designs: A Critical Element for a Credible Nursing Practice

6. For the introduction section, summarize (see the grading rubric for details):

a. The need for nursing research.

b. The importance for nurses to understand the basic principles of research.

c. The purpose of your paper.

7. For the Quantitative Research section summarize (see the grading rubric for details):

a. The importance of quantitative research.

b. One type of quantitative design; explain one important feature of this type of design.

c. How quantitative research can help improve nursing practice.

8. For the Qualitative Research section summarize (see the grading rubric for details):

a. The importance of qualitative research.

b. One type of qualitative design; explain one important feature of this type of design.

c. How qualitative research can help improve nursing practice.

9. For the Research Sampling section summarize (see the grading rubric for details):

a. What is sampling and why is sampling important.

b. One sampling strategy used in quantitative research.

c. One other sampling strategy that you learned.

10. For the Credible Nursing Practice section, summarize (see the grading rubric for details):

a. How research can help to make nursing practice safe.

b. Why research is critical for creating an evidence-based nursing practice.

11. For the Conclusion section summarize (see the grading rubric for details):

a. Short, concise, thorough summary of the main points of the paper.

12. Double check your work with the grading rubric to ensure you have met all grading criteria for this assignment.

13. Two supporting scholarly references are required. Your textbook is considered a scholarly source. Citations and References must be included.

14. This is a short, scholarly paper. The assignment should be 3-4 pages in length not including the title page and references page.

15. Submit the completed assignment on the Week 5: Assignment page.

**Academic Integrity Reminder**

College of Nursing values honesty and integrity. All students should be aware of the Academic Integrity policy and follow it in all discussions and assignments.

By submitting this assignment, I pledge on my honor that all content contained is my own original work except as quoted and cited appropriately. I have not received any unauthorized assistance on this assignment. Please see the grading criteria and rubrics on this page.

Please see the grading criteria and rubrics on this page.

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Undergraduate Major Project – Integrated Case Study

Undergraduate Major Project – Integrated Case Study

Write the plan of your search strategy for your Undergraduate Major Project, using the approved search strategy plan template. You should include details of the method you used to search the literature when researching your choice of one of the following organizations (or an organization/service agreed with the module lead).

The search strategy plan should provide an outline of how you undertook your literature search, presented in a systematic manner. You should include references to the relevant sources identified during your search.

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

To pass this assignment, you must satisfactorily complete all elements of the search strategy plan template. You must show the ability to:

  • Develop a systematic approach to searching for literature/evidence
  • Use the search strategy effectively, including qualitative and quantitative data and journal articles
  • Identify appropriate academic sources to support your research
  • Situate your sources within the Hierarchy of Sources (located on the VLE) Undergraduate Major Project – Integrated Case Study
  • Demonstrate the ability to use Harvard referencing correctly

Write the plan of your search strategy for your Undergraduate Major Project, using the approved search strategy plan template. You should include details of the method you used to search the literature when researching your choice of one of the following organizations (or an organization/service agreed with the module lead).

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

The search strategy plan should provide an outline of how you undertook your literature search, presented in a systematic manner. You should include references to the relevant sources identified during your search.

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

To pass this assignment, you must satisfactorily complete all elements of the search strategy plan template. You must show the ability to:

  • Develop a systematic approach to searching for literature/evidence
  • Use the search strategy effectively, including qualitative and quantitative data and journal articles
  • Identify appropriate academic sources to support your research
  • Situate your sources within the Hierarchy of Sources (located on the VLE)
  • Demonstrate the ability to use Harvard referencing correctly

Undergraduate Major Project – Integrated Case Study 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

HOMEWORK

Purpose
This assignment increases the students’ awareness of the National Patient Safety Goals developed by The Joint
Commission. Specifically, this assignment will introduce the Speak Up Initiatives, an award-winning patient safety
program designed to help patients promote their own safety by proactively taking charge of their healthcare.
Course outcomes: This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:
CO #2: Apply the concepts of health promotion and illness prevention in the laboratory setting. (PO #2)
CO #8: Explain the rationale for selected nursing interventions based upon current nursing literature. (PO #8)
Due date: Your faculty member will inform you when this assignment is due. The Late Assignment Policy applies to
this assignment.
Total points possible: 50 points
Preparing the assignment

  1. Follow these guidelines when completing this assignment. Speak with your faculty member if you have questions.
    a. Select a Speak Up brochure from The Joint Commission website.
    b. Write a short paper reviewing the brochure. Use the Grading Criteria (below) to structure your critique.
    c. Include current nursing or healthcare journal article to support your critique.
  2. Include the following sections
    a. Introduction of brochure (3 points/6%)
    i. Includes brochure title
    ii. Identifies date published
    iii. Describes individuals or groups
    iv. Brochure properly cited, included on reference list, and submitted with assignment
    b. Summary of article (5 points/ 10%) -brochure citation required
    i. Explain the main topics discussed
    c. Communication (5 points/10 %) -brochure citation required
    i. Review information that promotes communication between patients and healthcare providers
    d. Personal Reflection (2 points /4%)
    i. Why did this topic interest you?
    e. Evaluation of brochure (14 points/28% total (2 points each) (Brochure & nursing article must be cited)
    i. Was the information provided in the brochure beneficial? Could you incorporate it in your patient
    education?
    ii. What was done well, and what could have been improved in the brochure?
    iii. Was the information presented clearly?
    iv. Did current nursing or healthcare related research article support the information presented in the
    brochure?
    v. What population or individuals does this article apply to (i.e., who will benefit the most from this
    brochure)?
    vi. Who else can use this information?
    vii. Will this information increase patient safety?
    f. Evidence Review & Application (5 points/10% total)
    i. Evidence was integrated from a recent (5 years) scholarly nursing journal article to support your answers.
    g. Conclusion (5 points/10%)
    i. Restates main ideas
    ii. Includes supporting information from body of paper
    NR224 Fundamentals: Skills
    RUA: Safety Goals Guidelines
    NR224 RUA Safety Goals Guidelines V5.doc Revised: JAN21 2
    iii. Summarizes the benefits of following the brochure’s advice to a person at risk
    h. APA style and structure (2 points/4%)
    i. Adheres to current APA edition formatting guidelines for title page, margins, in-text citations, and
    references
    ii. Section headers are required
    a. Summary of Brochure
    b. Patient Communication
    c. Personal Reflection
    d. Evaluation of Brochure
    e. Evidence Review and Application
    f. Conclusion
    iii. Paper is no longer than three (3) pages, excluding title page, reference page, and copy of brochure
    a. Extra pages will not be read or contribute to the assignment grade
    i. Clarity of writing (9 points/18%)
    i. Proper use of Standard English
    ii. Shows original thought
    iii. No spelling or grammar errors
    iv. Information presented in a logical progression
    For writing assistance (APA, formatting, or grammar) visit the Citing Library Sources page in the online library.
    Please note that your instructor may provide you with additional assessments in any form to determine that you
    fully understand the concepts learned in the review module.
 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"