Exit Interview Anecdotes – My Blog

/in /by

 

Below are some anecdotes from the recent exit interviews of employees who resigned from the customer service team:

  • “I was overwhelmed with the amount of work I needed to do on a daily basis. I did not have time to answer all of the calls that I received, respond to all of the emails, plus be involved in the chat. I was constantly stressed, trying to respond in the timeline provided, but it just didn’t seem doable, and I became continuously frustrated by the unrealistic demands.”
  • “I have been a customer service representative for over five years, and I was hoping that I would have an opportunity to become a team lead at LTC, but there never seemed to be the opportunity for any openings on the leadership side. I am not challenged with my current job duties, and I am looking for more opportunities to grow.”
  • “I was new to LTC and needed some direction on how to accomplish the tasks I was given. I asked my team lead multiple times for more training, but they never seemed to have the time. I also asked the more senior customer service reps, but they didn’t have time either. I kept having to guess at what I was doing, and I was very frustrated about the lack of direction.”
  • “I have worked at LTC for over three years now, and while trying to do my job, I was also constantly training new employees. While I’m happy to help, I found it extremely difficult to manage both my own job and training. I became overwhelmed trying to do both and felt that I did not get the support I needed.”
  • “I did not have any opportunity to grow or advance, so I decided to leave.”
  • “This was my first job out of college, and I was hoping for more training to help me in my job. I was often confused about what I needed to do and how to do it. Once I started to understand a few tasks, I would get more, and with people leaving, I kept getting more work without any training.”

 

The post Exit Interview Anecdotes appeared first on PapersSpot.

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

ANSWER EACH IN 250 WORDS Briefly state the differences between relativism and

/in /by

ANSWER EACH IN 250 WORDS

Briefly state the differences between relativism and the dialectical method. Who do you think is correct, the sophists or Socrates and Plato? Both? Neither? Explain your answer.

Assess Plato’s theory of the Forms from Aristotle’s standpoint. Is Aristotle correct? Give good reasons for your answer.

Briefly summarize Aquinas’ argument from change, the first of his five ways. Apply one of d’Ailly’s objections to the argument. Do you agree with d’Ailly that human reason is limited regarding proofs of the existence of God? Explain your answer.

Hobbes, Locke, and Berkeley each write about the human will. After researching those passages, briefly state whether each philosopher thinks the will is free or determined. In your opinion, who is correct? Explain your answer.

Describe what Hume means when he says that reason is the slave of the passions. Do you agree with Hume that passion—in other words, sentiment—motivates people to act morally and that reason is enslaved to those passions? Explain your answer.

Kant thinks that everyone has a duty to act from respect for the moral law by obeying the supreme principle of morality. Kant thinks therefore that there is never a right to lie. If you agree with Kant, state why you think he is correct. If Kant is incorrect, give an example that shows that Kant’s position is absurd, in other words, that, in at least one instance, telling the truth would do more harm than good.

Think of present-day Western culture: films, music, advertisement. Do you see progress in the attempt to end what Wollstonecraft calls “sexual virtues”? Do you think instead that things are as bad or worse than what Wollstonecraft describes, or do you think that Wollstonecraft is wrong to claim the existence of “sexual virtues” to begin with? Give examples to explain your answer.

Decide on and write down a plan for how to justify your life by undertaking a meaningful project with others; support your plan by drawing from Simone de Beauvoir’s thought.  de Beauvoir thought that our lives are only authentic when we are freely engaging in projects that other free people will ultimately judge as worthy or not.  Do not focus on what other people will think about your project, instead focus on your freedom to do whatever you want to do.  Remember, in de Beauvoir’s thought God is dead so you are free to do whatever you would like – but other free people will ultimately “be God” too and judge your project.  The key here is your personal freedom to decide what you will do with your life – you, and only you, control that decision.

The post ANSWER EACH IN 250 WORDS Briefly state the differences between relativism and appeared first on PapersSpot.

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Performance Evaluation Scenarios – My Blog

/in /by

 

Name: Jerome J.
Summary: This is Jerome’s first job out of college, and he has been with the company for just over one year. Jerome is introverted and has trouble speaking up in meetings. He often feels as though his ideas go unheard and that others dismiss his involvement. He wants to ensure he feels valued by the team and that he has a safe space to contribute, but this has been difficult for him, as he is a remote employee. With customers, Jerome is very friendly, professional, and knowledgeable, but he struggles to fully direct the call and deescalate angry or upset customers.

Name: Frank L.
Summary: Frank has 25 years of professional experience in the field and has been with LTC for five years. Frank enjoys thinking at a high level and does a great job conceptualizing, but he does not enjoying getting in the weeds and producing at a granular level. While he does a great job generating bigger ideas, he has trouble putting his ideas into action. Frank is extremely confident in his abilities and very personable, and he is a go-to for questions from other employees. With customers, Frank is knowledgeable and professional, and he loves conversation. He is not, however, the most efficient with his work, as Frank loves to chat, and his calls can be quite long, making some customers frustrated about the length of time waiting or on the call. In addition, while Frank is knowledgeable, he can improve his work in assisting customers by becoming more proactive in responding to customer needs. Frank has expressed his interest in becoming a team lead and is looking for additional training and development opportunities to help prepare him for the role.

Name: Allyson C.
Summary: This is Allyson’s first job out of college, and she has been with the company for two years. Allyson is a collaborative employee who enjoys working with her peers. She thrives on brainstorming with her peers in meetings and is able to generate creative solutions to problems. She enjoys thinking outside the box and experimenting with new ideas around processes and products. In past performance reviews, she has expressed her interest in becoming a team lead, so she has requested additional training in management and leadership.

Name: Jin L.

Summary: Jin is nearing retirement and has spent the last three years with LTC. Jin is outgoing and thrives when interacting with people, though at times she can be confrontational. She is efficient and likes to take on projects, but she becomes easily bored and anxious when more discussion than action occurs. This same behavior is exhibited in conversations with customers, as when Jin is engaged, she excels and is a model employee. But when disengaged, Jin tunes out and stops contributing to the conversation, leaving the customer to believe Jin is uninterested, rude, and unwilling to help.

Name: Arick K.
Summary: Arick has ten years of professional experience and has been with LTC for almost two years. Arick completes his daily tasks in an acceptable manner and is happy with the status quo. He is not interested in taking on additional responsibilities or learning new tasks, and he does not have aspirations for promotion at the company. In the past, when approached about additional professional development opportunities or tasks, Arick has become confrontational and has expressed that his current role is all he can handle. Time management has been an item appearing regularly on Arick’s performance evaluations, as he struggles to balance the phone calls, emails, and live chat. Although his previous manager tried to assist him with time management and tried to create efficiencies in his work, Arick has stated that he is not interested.

 

The post Performance Evaluation Scenarios appeared first on PapersSpot.

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

2022 Talent Re-set Conversation and Essay The Purpose of this session and

/in /by

2022 Talent Re-set Conversation and Essay

The Purpose of this session and team essay is to engage MIE 432 students in a conversation with current HR professionals to learn about the “ new “ work environment, the considerations of firms to address the attraction and retention of talent in a dynamic time and the skills needed for HR professionals to excel.

The Great Resignation is a term that is being used to describe current labor trends, but is that too generic of a description to really capture the Employer- Employee dynamics in 2022?

On February 28 we will host many NCSU HR concentration alumni and members of our NCSU HR Advisory Board in a facilitated conversation. There will be a panel that will share some thoughts and then in breakout rooms we will continue the conversation.

Three Pre-reads will help you prepare for this session.

Toxic Culture Is Driving the Great Resignation

Research using employee data reveals the top five predictors of attrition and four actions managers can take in the short term to reduce attrition, Donald Sull, Charles Sull, and Ben Zweig January 11, 2022, MIT Sloan Review

What we’re getting wrong about the ‘Great Resignation’, Bryan Lufkin 28th October 2021, BBC

https://www.bbc.com/worklife/article/20211028-what-were-getting-wrong-about-the-great-resignation

4 Ways ‘The Great Reshuffle’ Can Help Us Reimagine The Employer-Employee Dynamic, Mark C. Perna Contributor, Nov 9, 2021, Forbes

Following the session you and your team will compare the notes you have taken from the session, reflect, do further outside research, and answer the following questions in an essay that is due on March 7, 2022. Be sure to include some real examples from the session conversations and be sure to cite and include all references.

If you had to explain the “Great Resignation” in an interview, how would you explain it now that you have researched and discussed it?

What are the business challenges and accompanying talent issues that HR professionals and their organizations are facing in this dynamic time?

How can HR play a key role in achieving the goals of their organization and is that role different now than it has been historically? What are the necessary skills to be successful?

The post 2022 Talent Re-set Conversation and Essay The Purpose of this session and appeared first on PapersSpot.

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Coming of age in Samoa- Reaction Paper 1

/in /by

ANTH 205: Anthropology of Sex

Spring 2022

Professor: Celia Tuchman-Rosta 

ASSIGNMENT: Reaction Paper 1 — Coming of age in Samoa

Introduction:

Students will be required to write reaction papers (3 pages long) that respond to key issues discussed in the two ethnographies covered in the course. These papers will be submitted in the Assignments Area and run through SafeAssign to check for plagiarism.

Note: This is an essay, it must include an introduction, two (or more) body paragraphs in which you discuss the article and other readings, compare and contrast the ideas, and discuss critiques of problems with the work, and a conclusion. You need to include proper citations in the Chicago Manual of Style Author/Date Format (the list of references is not included in the two page length requirement).

Reaction Paper Prompt:

Coming of age in Samoa by Margaret Mead (1928) examines the experiences of adolescent girls in Samoa and contrasts these experiences with those of adolescents in the United States during the same time period. Now that you have finished reading Margaret Mead’s book and some to the responses to her work (Freeman, Shankman, Orans, and Coté) reflect on what you have learned about the sexual lives of adolescents in Samoa and their lives more broadly.

Essay Content:

Reflect on the following questions in your essay:

1) What were Margaret Mead’s goals in the book?

2) What methods did Margaret Mead use to gather information?

3) How do Samoan girls deal with adolescence?

4) Why was the sexual lies of adolescent girls such an important part of the book?

5) Overall, how successful was mead in accomplishing her goals? Explain.

6) Using the articles by Freeman, Shankman, Orans, and Coté, discuss: what are some of the weaknesses of the Margaret Mead’s work?

7) Was Derek Freeman correct? Discuss the Mead/Freeman controversy, using evidence from Mead’s book and the work of the Freeman, Shankman, Orans and Coté, discuss whether or not you think Margaret Mead was hoaxed or mis-represented her data.

Format/Submission:

  1. This is an essay, you must have an introduction, body and conclusion. Bullet points/outlines will not be accepted.
  2. Use an easy to read type phase such as Times New Roman. You must use 10-12 point font and double space your work. Essays are expected to be two pages long.
  3. You must include a header at the top of the page that includes your name, the assignment title (Reaction Paper 1 – Coming of age in Samoa), and the course (ANTH 205).
  4. Use the Chicago Manual of Style Author-Date Format for parenthetical citations in the body of the essay and your list of references at the end of the essay. (It is acceptable to use only readings that have been assigned in the course).
  5. The title of your document must include your name, the course, and the assignment name (Jade_Doe_ANTH205_Whats in a Quote Sex and Sexuality.docx)
  6. Submit in the Assignments area by Sunday February 27 at 11:59 pm in a pdf of .docx format

 

Points 21-23 17-20 14-16 0
Identification

of the Quote

(23%)

 Student accurately identifies the quote, includes the page number, and explains its importance in the article. Student accurately identifies the quote and explains what the quote means, but does not contextualize it within the article Student identifies the quote, but does not sufficiently explain what it means. Student des not identify the quote/assignment not submitted.
Discussion of

the Article in

connection to course themes

(23%)

 Students presents several key ideas that were discussed in the articles and clearly expresses how it is connected to the material discussed in the first three weeks Student present some of the key ideas that were discussed in the article and makes connection with the material discussed in the first three weeks OR students accurately discusses several key ideas, but connection to larger themes is not fully realized Student summarizes article, but the summary lacks accuracy and does not demonstrate a good understanding of the subject Discussion of the article is not included/

assignment not submitted
Synthesis of assigned material

(23%)

 Student articulates connections between the article and at least two other readings clearly. The student is able to use clear Examples from the reading to demonstrate these connections. Student discusses how at least two of the other readings assigned also address themes from the curse, but the connection to the article is unclear. Student does not accurate discuss other assigned reading OR only one other reading is discussed No other readings are discussed/no assignment submitted
Critical analysis/Broader connections

(23%)

 Students provide a clear and insightful discussion of the strengths and weaknesses of the article and explore how the article is connected to larger themes in the Anthropology of sex Students provide a good discussion of strengths and weaknesses in the article OR explore how the article is connected to larger themes in the Anthropology of sex Strengths and weakness are not clearly discussed No critical analysis/No submission
Format/Grammar/Citations

10%

 9-10

Essay is properly formatted, easy to read and include proper citations and list of references

 7-8

Some formatting and citation errors/some grammar mistakes but ideas are still clearly presented

 5-6

List of references is included, but incomplete/incorrect formatting/grammar errors make it difficult to understand the essay

 0

List of references/proper citations are missing

MAY BE REPORTED TO ACADEMIC INTERITY

 

The post Coming of age in Samoa- Reaction Paper 1 appeared first on PapersSpot.

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Written Paper Rubric Key elements of the Annotated Bibliography (30 Points): At

/in /by

Written Paper

Rubric

Key elements of the Annotated Bibliography (30 Points):

At least six primary peer-reviewed articles are included. (6 points)

At least two secondary peer-reviewed articles are included. (2 points)

Each reference is complete and in the AMA format. (6 points)

Journal articles are cited as journal articles and NOT websites

There are 1-2 sentences that describe the main finding of this article under the reference. (16 points)

Key elements of the written paper (100 points):

There is an introduction paragraph in the beginning and conclusion/summary paragraph at the end that ties the paper together. (10 points)

A clear position on the topic is made in the conclusion. (10 points)

At least six primary peer-reviewed articles and two secondary peer-reviewed articles are included. (16 points)

Peer-reviewed articles are accurately discussed. (20 points).

Participants, intervention, comparisons/controls, outcomes measured, and study design are correct

Results are interpreted correctly

Strengths and weaknesses/limitations are described

Note: Each article can be discussed individually or you can summarize similar attributes together.

Arguments that are made are well supported by the scientific studies included. (19 points)

Text is clear and easy to read. (10 points).

Scientific writing is clear and to the point

Use action verbs

Formatted according to the directions. (5 points).

Approximately 5-7 pages

Double-spaced, 11 point Arial font, 1-inch margins.

No spelling or grammar issues (5 points).

Work is cited and in AMA format (5 point).

In text citations are in the correct location and are marked with a superscript number.

Reference list is at the end of the paper and:

Formatted according to AMA

Journal articles are cited as journal articles and NOT websites

The post Written Paper Rubric Key elements of the Annotated Bibliography (30 Points): At appeared first on PapersSpot.

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Assignment: Write a paper about anything related to Human Resource Management. The paper will be about 3000 words and APA 7 needs to be followed. I will attach the format that professor wants, doesn’t

/in /by

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.

That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Critique of an argument essay.

/in /by

Critique of an argument essay. you recently did a paper for me where you had to write a summary of an argument essay and now the professor wants us to do an evaluation of that same essay

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Why is American Sign Language important to the deaf community?

/in /by

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.

That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

As reported in Plato’s account The Apology, Socrates famously claimed at his trial that “The unexamined life is not worth living.” In this course, you have had the opportunity to examine your own life and reality through the thoughts of the Ancient Greek philosophers. The purpose of this touchstone assignment is for you (1) to engage with the philosophical ideas presented in this course and (2) to reflect on how these philosophical ideas have impacted your own life. Part I: Philosophical Thinking In the first part of th

/in /by

As reported in Plato’s account The Apology, Socrates famously claimed at his trial that “The unexamined life is not worth living.” In this course, you have had the opportunity to examine your own life and reality through the thoughts of the Ancient Greek philosophers. The purpose of this touchstone assignment is for you (1) to engage with the philosophical ideas presented in this course and (2) to reflect on how these philosophical ideas have impacted your own life.

Part I: Philosophical Thinking
In the first part of the touchstone, you will be distinguishing between the three primary branches of philosophy.

Consider the three following questions:
What is knowledge?
What is reality made of?
What is the good life and how ought I to live it?
These are the basic questions that were considered in different forms by the major figures in Ancient Greek philosophy. But they are also critical questions for our own lives today, whether we are philosophers or not.

Part I of this assignment should be approximately 1-2 pages (300-600 words) and cover each of the following steps:
First, you should define philosophy and then distinguish and define each of the three main branches of philosophy covered in this class.
Then, identify which of the above questions is associated with each branch of philosophy.
You should illustrate the differences between the three branches of philosophy using examples from the course. For example, explain how Socrates would answer the question “What is knowledge?” or how Epictetus would answer the question “What is the good life?”
You will use information and examples from the Sophia tutorials to support your response. When citing material from a tutorial, please include the name of the lesson and use the following format:
In-text citation: (Aristotle’s Highest Good, n.d.) or (The Footnotes to Plato, n.d.).
Part II: Reflection
For the second part of the touchstone, now that you’ve distinguished between the three main branches of philosophy, you will focus on one of those three questions from Part I and use that as a starting point and guide for your personal philosophical reflection.

The purpose of Part II is for you to reflect on the philosophical mindset and some of the ideas presented in this course and apply them to your own life. This reflection is more open-ended than Part I, but should include reflections on the following questions:

What does it mean to think philosophically? How can thinking philosophically help me in my own life?
What impact do the ideas of the Ancient Greek philosophers have on my own views and opinions?
Then, based on these reflections, you should give your own answer to whichever of the three questions from Part I you chose to focus on, using cited examples from the course to support your answer. (“What is knowledge?”; “What is reality?”; “What is the good life?”)
Part II of this assignment should be approximately 1-2 pages (300-600 words). You should write at least one paragraph for each of the three prompts listed above.
In answering these reflection questions, you are free to draw from your own experiences as well as bringing in the ideas of different Ancient Greek philosophers. Please note: Some philosophers will be more suited for particular questions than others. For example, Epictetus has a lot to say about “What is the good life and how ought I to live it?” while not saying much about knowledge or reality. Plato and Aristotle wrote a great deal about all three questions.

B. Completion Guidelines
Refer to the checklist below throughout the writing process. Do not submit your Touchstone until it meets these guidelines.
Part I: Philosophical Thinking
❒ Have you defined philosophy and the three main branches of philosophy?
❒ Have you identified which branch of philosophy each of the three basic philosophical questions (“What is knowledge?”; “What is reality?”; “What is the good life?”) corresponds to?
❒ Have you used cited examples from the course to illustrate the differences between the three branches of philosophy?
Part II: Reflection
❒ Have you selected one of the three basic philosophical questions from Part I to focus on?
❒ Have you reflected on what philosophical thinking means to you?
❒ Have you reflected on how the ideas of the Ancient Greek philosophers can impact your own views and opinions?
❒ Have you given your own answer to whichever of the three questions from Part I you chose to focus on in Part II, and provided cited examples from the course to support your answer?
Conventions
❒ Have you checked your essay for grammatical and mechanical errors?
❒ Have you used spell check or another method to check spelling?
❒ Have you cited examples from the course using the in-text citation instructions?
Before you Submit
❒ Have you included your name, date, and course at the top left of the page?
❒ Is your essay between 3-4 pages (approximately 700-1000 words)?

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"