Write a paper improving the Personal Protection Equipment supply for the radiology department in a governmental hospital in the UAE

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.

That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Write a rhetorical analysis on Thomas Paine.

Write a rhetorical analysis on Thomas Paine.

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Write a paper on changing faces of Indian agriculture

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.

That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Write about the case: You are in your local computer store and see a “low-cost” laptop selling for just $299.

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.

That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Identify major developments in the history of managerial thought including classical and contemporary approaches

Learning Outcome (LO)

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

[In Process] 71297 – ASSESSMENT 1 BRIEFSubject Code and Title

ASSESSMENT 1 BRIEF
Subject Code and Title MKT600/MKTG6002 Marketing
Assessment 1 Situation Analysis
Individual/Group Individual
Length 2000 words (+/- 10% excluding cover page, table of contents, executive summary, references and appendix).
Learning Outcomes This assessment addresses the following learning outcomes of the subject:
a) Critically evaluate underpinning marketing theories and principles and employ appropriate research process to collect, store and use of data to generate customer insights;
b) Critically evaluate customer needs to create value for customers by deploying the resources of the organisation in best possible ways;
Submission For 12 weeks delivery – due on Sunday at 11:55 pm (AEST/AEDT) by the end of the week 5.
For 6 weeks (intensive) delivery – due on Sunday at 11:55 pm (AEST/AEDT) by the end of the week 5.
Weighting 30%
Total Marks 30 marks
Objectives:
• To develop an understanding and appreciation about the influences of micro and macro environmental actors and forces that affect an organisation’s ability to serve the needs of the target market;

To develop critical analytical ability to gather and analyse relevant data to facilitate decision making;
• To develop foresights to predict industry trend and tailor the organisation’s practices to respond to the changing situation.
How the assessment fits into the subject/course:
Marketing in the 21st century has evolved profoundly which is a critical element of business administration. The design of marketing plans is integral to business organisation and the assessment of this subject aims to provide students with the opportunity to apply the knowledge to develop effective marketing strategies. This assessment requires the students to analyse overall situation of the Business Case provided on Blackboard prior to developing a marketing plan. The students will then continue to develop a complete marketing plan in their next assessment for the same Business Case given on Blackboard. A short scenario is given below to help students address the tasks involved in the assessment 1.
MKT600/MKTG6002_Assessment 1_Situation Analysis Page 1 of 6
Linkages between Assessments 1 and 2:
Assessment 1 requires students to undertake the SWOT/TOWS analysis (Case Study will be Provided on Blackboard). Students are advised to conduct comprehensive research through the Torrens Library database. The assessments 1 and 2 are interlinked where students need to summarise the situation analysis from their assignment 1 while discussing this section within the assessment 2, the marketing plan.
Instructions:
This assessment task entails you to develop a Marketing Environmental Analysis that comprises both the micro-environment and macro-environment. The micro-environment analysis involves a scrutiny of internal environment that facilitates specifying the strengths and weaknesses, while, the macro-environment analysis requires the scrutiny of demographic, economic, natural, political, technological, and cultural (DENPTC) dimensions which will assist in specifying the opportunities and threats. Changes within the macro environmental forces are outside of an organisation’s direct control entailing an organisation’s marketing strategies to be adjusted to capture emerging opportunities and minimise any potential threats. Therefore, in this assessment task you will need to:
• Articulate your learning about marketing concepts and principles covered from Module 1 to 3.1 to demonstrate your level of understanding to evaluate the organisation’s overall situation;
• Critically analyse the link between marketing theory and practice;
• Demonstrate research skills to reveal the insights;
• Apply appropriate business report writing skills;
• Discuss appropriate strategies with regards to your SWOT analysis.
• Use the appropriate APA style both in text citation and the reference list at the end. You should use at least 10 relevant academic references from leading marketing journals and textbooks to showcase quality of your research. Please see more information on referencing here: • https:// library.torrens.edu.au/academicskills/apa/tool
Scenario: Case Study for this Assessment will be provided on Blackboard.
MKT600/MKTG6002_Assessment 1_Situation Analysis Page 2 of 6
Tasks:
1. Discuss the value propositions, core brand values and buyer behaviour of your chosen organisation;
2. Analyse the micro-environment (the company, suppliers, intermediaries, relevant publics, customers and competitors);
3. Analyse the macro environment, that is, demographic, economic, natural, technological, political and cultural (DENTPC) forces to demonstrate their impacts on your chosen organisation’s strategies/capabilities to serve the target market (s;
4. List the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT) as well as suggest appropriate strategies by incorporating the TOWS matrix to draw from strengths to capture opportunities, to overcome weaknesses and to defend from threats.
Note: Take time to gather relevant data about your chosen organisation as well as the broader external environment in which the organisation operates. Find good quality academic references from high quality marketing journals and text books to substantiate your arguments, suggestions and explanations. Use relevant headings/sub-headings to ensure a cohesiveness and logical flow of the report.
Submission Instructions:
Submit your assessment via the Assessment link in the main navigation menu in MKT600/ MKTG6002 Marketing subject. Please review TUA overdue policy in page 5 through the link copied below which applies a 10% deduction for each day up to FIVE days. Any submission that overdue for more than FIVE days will get 0.
https://laureateaus.sharepoint.com/sites/MyTorrens/Shared%20Documents/Forms/Pol icies_Filter.aspx?id=%2Fsites%2FMyTorrens%2FShared%20Documents%2FPolicies%2Fa ssessment%20policy%20for%20he%20coursework%20and%20elicos%5Fpl%5Ftua%5Fac %2Epdf&parent=%2Fsites%2FMyTorrens%2FShared%20Documents%2FPolicies&p=true
&originalPath=aHR0cHM6Ly9sYXVyZWF0ZWF1cy5zaGFyZXBvaW50LmNvbS86Yjovcy9Ne VRvcnJlbnMvRWFLY2xTM28tUHBOa25uX2ZQV2Z6c2NCRzJFSVI0OXJ0amxjYlF5bGZDYjl0 dz9ydGltZT1pWEF5NDdrLTJVZw
MKT600/MKTG6002_Assessment 1_Situation Analysis Page 3 of 6
Marking Rubric: Assessment 1
Assessment Fail (Unacceptable) Pass
(Functional)
50-64% Credit
(Proficient) 65-74% Distinction
(Advanced)
75 -84% High Distinction
(Exceptional)
85-100%
Attributes 0-49%
Evaluation of Limited understanding of Resembles a recall or Supports personal opinion Discriminates between Systematically and critically
information key concepts required to summary of key ideas. and information assertion of personal discriminates between
gathered to support support discussion substantiated by evidence opinion and information assertion of personal
the arguments Often conflates/confuses from the research/course substantiated by robust opinion and information
Confuses logic and assertion of personal materials. evidence from the substantiated by robust
15%
emotion. Information taken from reliable sources but without a coherent analysis or synthesis.
opinion with information substantiated by evidence from the research/course materials.
Analysis and evaluation do
Information is taken from 15+ good quality sources with and demonstrates a capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts. research/course materials and extended reading.
Information are gathered from 20+ good quality sources with a well- evidence from the
research/course materials and extended reading.
Information are sourced from 30+ good quality
Viewpoints of experts are not reflect expert Identify logical flaws. demonstrated capacity to sources with a high level of
taken as fact with little judgement, intellectual explain and apply relevant interpretation/evaluation
questioning. independence, rigor and Questions viewpoints of concepts. to develop a
adaptability. experts. Viewpoint of experts are comprehensive critical
subject to questioning. analysis or synthesis.
Analysis and evaluation
Identifies gaps in
reflect growing judgement, knowledge.
intellectual independence, rigor and adaptability.
Exhibits intellectual independence, rigor, good
judgement and adaptability.
Effective Difficult to understand for Information, arguments and Information, arguments and Information, arguments and Expertly presented; the
Communication audience, no logical/clear evidence are presented in a evidence are well presented, evidence are very well report is logical, persuasive,
structure, poor flow of way that is not always clear mostly clear flow of ideas and presented; the report is and well supported by
20% ideas, argument lacks and logical. arguments. logical, clear and well evidence, demonstrating a
supporting evidence. supported by evidence.
MKT600/MKTG6002_Assessment 1_Situation Analysis Page 4 of 6
Audience cannot follow the line of reasoning.
Demonstrates inconsistent use of good quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas. Line of reasoning is often difficult to follow.
Demonstrates use of credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas, but these are not always explicit or well developed. Line of reasoning is easy to follow.
Demonstrates use of high quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas. Demonstrates cultural sensitivity.
Demonstrates use of good quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop arguments and statements. Shows evidence of wide scope within the organisation for sourcing evidence. clear flow of ideas and arguments.
Engages and sustains audience’s interest in the topic, demonstrates high levels of cultural sensitivity Demonstrates use of high- quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop arguments and position statements. Shows evidence of wide scope within and without the organisation for sourcing evidence
Effective use of diverse presentation aids, including graphics and multi-media.
Critically evaluates client needs with regard to Micro-
environment actors
Suppliers,
intermediaries, publics,
customers
20%
Does not display an understanding of the Microenvironment (e.g., intermediaries, suppliers, publics).
Sensible challenges are not presented Some relevant suppliers, intermediaries and publics are identified.
Some potential challenges are identified.
Relevant suppliers, intermediaries and publics are mostly identified.
Potential challenges are mostly identified. Thorough review of relevant suppliers, intermediaries and publics.
Good discussion of potential challenges, supported by sound arguments and/or good sources.
Systematically and critically reviews
relevant suppliers, intermediaries and publics.
Systematically and critically discusses potential challenges, supported by sound
MKT600/MKTG6002_Assessment 1_Situation Analysis Page 5 of 6
arguments and/or good sources.
Critically evaluates
client needs with regard to Macro- environment – DENPTC
20% Superficial review of the DENPTC dimensions.
No or little consideration of influences of the external environment. Provides a satisfactory discussion of the DENPTC dimensions.
Satisfactory relevant data/information provided to substantiate the discussion. Good discussion on the DENPTC dimensions has been provided with good relevant data/ information to support the arguments. Thorough research on the DENPTC dimensions reveals relevant data/ information. The discussion is presented in a logical and systematic approach. Critically evaluates the data/information gathered on the DENPTC dimensions. The discussion is presented with strong arguments and substantiated with relevant data as well as demonstrates the potential effects on the business.
Critically evaluates the business’s overall situation to list out strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats and discusses appropriate strategies to draw on the strengths to capture opportunities, defend from threats and overcome weaknesses
25% Discussion is not relevant to client needs – superficial or general discussion of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats.
Does not show understanding of relevant concepts. Some relevant factors related to the business’s overall situation discussed demonstrating some understanding of the concepts covered but appropriate strategies to draw on the strengths to capture opportunities, defend from threats and overcome weaknesses not clearly articulated. Mostly relevant factors discussed to specify strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats while appropriate strategies to draw on the strengths to capture opportunities, defend from threats and overcome weaknesses not well articulated. Good discussion of internal and external environment analysis leading to list out the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats and appropriate strategies to draw from the strengths to capture opportunities, defend from threats and overcome weaknesses. Critically evaluates the business’s overall situation and provides a comprehensive list of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats. Discussed succinctly appropriate strategies to draw on strengths to capture opportunities, defend from threats and overcome weaknesses.
MKT600/MKTG6002_Assessment 1_Situation Analysis
Page 6 of 6

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Good day,Can you quote me how much it is to do the assignment

Good day,
Can you quote me how much it is to do the assignment attached. Please note that the second attachment is just an example of how the assignment should be. The due date I have put is when I expect the assignment to have been completed.
Warm regards
ASSESSMENT ITEM 2: DESCRIPTION
The aim of this assessment is to generate a report in the form of a business plan that leverages the student’s understanding of economic concepts of this subject. It should be between 4500 and 5000 words in total (including references). Please use the online template and refer to the associated rubric.
Instructions:
• The student will use economic understanding and skills to create a (hypothetical) business plan for the expansion of an ASX company [of the student’s choosing] by building a sustainable (in which the business generates revenues sufficient to cover all costs) foreign-based carbon offset business that operates in a foreign country [of the student’s choosing (but not Australia)]. A template is provided online for the student to use.

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

71305 – UU- MBA711: DissertationContent and Structure of your

UU- MBA711: Dissertation
Content and Structure of your Dissertation
Brief, Guidelines and Marking Criteria
Writing your Dissertation
Use your work throughout this module, and the provided structure below for your research project. As you
draft each part of your project report, continue to review your work to ensure that the content is clear and accessible, and your writing style is appropriate. Be prepared to read your draft material very carefully and repeatedly to seek to improve its clarity and style. Where possible, re-read and amend drafts of a section or chapter when your mind is fresh. The structure you devise, related to your research approach and research strategy, will have implications for how you discuss the role of literature, theory, methods, findings, and conclusions in your project report. As you produce your draft, continue to evaluate how well these elements fit together without overlapping in your report. If any parts of your research are not clear, you will need to continue to re-draft the report.
As the draft of your report develops, ensure that you distinguish between describing events, outlining
methods, reporting findings, and interpreting and theorizing about what you found. This will be important irrespective of the structure you use so that your readers may distinguish between these elements in your work. Give your report the reader-friendly test to ensure that your style is easy to read, and the content is clear and free from avoidable errors.
Content and Indicative Structure of your Dissertation
The purpose of this section is to provide you with an overview of the type of structure and form to be used when preparing your Dissertation along with the approximate words’ breakdown.
The words limit of your Dissertation is 6500 (+/- 10%) words (not including appendices and references).
Text Layout:
? Font: Times New Roman ? Size: 12
? Line spacing: 1 ½
Content and Structure of your Dissertation and Marking Criteria 1 | Page

UU- MBA711: Dissertation
Cover Page
1. Institution and Department
2.Title of the Dissertation
3.Student’s Name
4.Tutor’s Name
Abstract (300 words)
The Dissertation should contain an abstract of up to 300 words. A good abstract is difficult to write and can only be completed after the full Dissertation has been written. It represents a brief summary of the aim, objectives, and results of the dissertation research. By summarizing the results of the research, it allows other people to get an idea of what was accomplished without having to read through the whole Dissertation. Other scholars can read an abstract to decide if looking at the full work will be worthwhile. The typical questions an abstract should answer are the following:
? What is the project about and what have been its goals and objectives? ? How the project was carried out?
? What have been the outcomes and achievements of the project?
o Keywords
Acknowledgments
A brief statement should be written which acknowledges all assistance received in writing the Dissertation.
Table of Contents
The contents page should list the chapter headings, appendices, references, and the pages on which they can be found. A separate listing should be given for lists of figures and tables. You will find this easier to create if you know how to generate these lists using the indexing and style functions within Microsoft Word (References Table of Contents). For more information, kindly request assistance from your tutor.
Content and Structure of your Dissertation and Marking Criteria 2 | Page

UU- MBA711: Dissertation
List of Tables (if any)
The list of tables is the same format as the table of contents.
List of Charts (if any)
The list of charts is the same format as the table of contents.
Abbreviations
Summarizes all-important abbreviations used in the text.
Introduction (750 words, ± 10%)
The Introduction to the Dissertation should set out the background to the research study and address the following areas:
? Case background – The context in which the research took place ? Significance of investigation
? A clear statement of the problem ? Research Questions
? A clear statement of the aim and objectives that the project is going to address ? The reasons why this study was carried out
? A brief summary of the research and the tools to be used ? The way the project is to be organized
Literature review (2500 words, ± 10%)
The literature review is presented in the form of a classification, a comparison and a critical analysis of that
material which is germane to a full understanding of your research study. Such published material may be drawn from all, or a combination of, textbooks, journal articles, conference papers, reports and case studies. The most important source of academic literature are journal articles and you should ensure that you are familiar with the most recent publications in journals relevant to your subject area. It is expected that your final Dissertation will cite between 25 to 30 relevant and credible references. You must use the APA-style reference system in both the body of the text and your Reference section.
The several points that should be addressed in a literature review are:
? What do we already know in the immediate area/topic researched?
? What are the characteristics of the key concepts and theories developed?
Content and Structure of your Dissertation and Marking Criteria 3 | Page

UU- MBA711: Dissertation
? What are the relationships between these key concepts and theories to your project topic? ? Why study the research problem further?
? What contribution does your research aim to make to knowledge?
Remember that your literature review should lead and justify the research objectives and questions of your Dissertation.
Research Methodology/Design (1000 words, ± 10%)
You should begin the Research Methodology chapter by stating, again, the research objectives of the project. In this chapter, you have the opportunity to justify to the reader the process by which the research questions, which were derived by an analysis of the relevant literature were answered. The chapter on research methodology must, argue for, and justify each, decision that is taken when arriving at how the research is to be organized. Make sure that you mention as a subchapter in your Dissertation the ethical issues. There are several approaches used in the research methodology and design. For your research in this course, remember that you can use ONLY secondary data to produce your methodology.
Critical evaluation of secondary data (1200 words, ± 10%)
This chapter presents the evidence and/or results of secondary research which you have undertaken. Depending upon your subject area this can be in the form of detailed quantitative or qualitative models, hypothesis testing to some basic analysis using basic descriptive statistics. The main part of the chapter is the presentation of the data that you obtained. This data must be organized in a logical and coherently ordered whole so that your thought processes and interpretation are clear to the reader.
Graphs, diagrams, pie-charts, etc. are all useful ways of presenting research results; they are an imaginative way of ‘breaking up’ solid blocks of text – they let a little ‘light’ into the body of the text as long as they are relevant and illustrate your points. Keep your review to those items which are relevant to your research question(s) and not just everything you found out.
Content and Structure of your Dissertation and Marking Criteria 4 | Page

UU- MBA711: Dissertation
Conclusions & Recommendations (750 words, ± 10%)
Here you will bring together the work of the Dissertation by showing how the initial research plan has been addressed in such a way that conclusions may be formed from the evidence of the Dissertation. No new material or references should be placed here. The conclusions should make a statement on the extent to which each of the aims and objectives has been met. You should bring back your research questions and state clearly your understanding of those questions. Be careful not to make claims that are not substantiated from the evidence you have presented in earlier chapters.
Additionally, you should include a short subsection on any suggestions for further research for colleagues who might wish to research this area in the future. There should also be a short statement of the limitations of the research.
Reference List (APA Referencing Style)
The reference section is the section of all the documents you have cited in your Dissertation and it is found at
the end of the body of your work, but before your appendices. In this section, if you refer to work by another author (including theories, models, measurement scales, or diagrams) you must cite the original author and source. References are included within the text to enable any reader who is interested to be able to find the complete details of the work you have drawn upon.
The University requires that you use the APA System of referencing, both within the body of your work and
also within your reference list at the end of your work. These are listed in alphabetical order. The reference section is useful to those marking your work to see the scope of your reading in the preparation of your project. It is also useful for future readers to access your cited references.
Appendices
Appendices may be used to provide relevant supporting evidence for reference but should only be used if
necessary. You may wish to include in appendices, evidence that confirms the originality of your work or to illustrate points of the principle set out in the main text, questionnaires, and interview guidelines.
Note: All the abovementioned chapters should start on a new page
Content and Structure of your Dissertation and Marking Criteria 5 | Page

UU- MBA711: Dissertation
The following points should be noted for this part of the assessment:
? This is an individual assessment, not a group task.
? Your project should be submitted on the due date (i.e., Sunday of Week 12) by 11.59 p.m. (23.59 hours) VLE (UTC) time at the latest. To submit your assignment, please use the submission link titled “Assessment Point – Dissertation” that is located in Week 12 on the VLE page of your module.
? Literature should be sourced from a range of journal articles and textbooks. A limited range of readings will be made available.
? The word count is 6500 words +/- 10%. This does not include the reference list and any appendices the assignment may include.
? Accurate referencing of sources is crucial in this coursework. The referencing system used in this module is the APA Reference system. Please make sure you are familiar with this. Marks will be deducted for inaccurate referencing.
? Academic Integrity: Students are expected to demonstrate academic integrity bycompleting their own work, assignments, and other assessment exercises. Submission of work from another person, whether it is from printed sources or someone other than the student; previously graded papers; papers submitted without proper citations; or submitting the same paper to multiple courses without the knowledge of all instructors involved can result in a failing grade. Incidents involving academic dishonesty will be reported to university officials for appropriate sanctions. Furthermore, students must always submit work that represents their original words or ideas. If any words or ideas used in an assignment or assessment submission do not represent the student’s original words or ideas, all relevant sources must be cited along with the extent to which such sources were used. Words or ideas that require citation include, but are not limited to, all hard copy or electronic publications, whether copyrighted or not and all verbal or visual communication when the content of such communication clearly originates from an identifiable source.
? The assessment must be submitted electronically via “Turnitin.”
Content and Structure of your Dissertation and Marking Criteria 6 | Page

UU- MBA711: Dissertation
Marking criteria
Your assignment will be assessed using the Writing Rubric located below of the Marking Criteria shell
as shown in the next pages.
Element & Weight Marking (%)
Introduction, Content, and Research Objectives (15%)
Guiding questions:
• Is the research topic or problem clearly stated and shown to be worth investigating? • Has appropriate background information been provided with special terms and
concepts defined?
• Are the research objectives (research questions or hypotheses) clear, relevant, coherent, and achievable?
• Do objectives etc. go beyond mere description; i.e., do they involve explanation, comparison, criticism or evaluation?
90% to 100% ? Significant contribution to knowledge.
? Theoretically or practically significant topic.
? Aim and research questions are original, clearly defined and perfectly aligned.
80% to 89% ? Useful contribution to knowledge.
? Interesting topic, relevant to management research.
? Aim and research questions are clearly defined and aligned.
70% to 79% ? Adds input to knowledge without necessarily making a significant contribution.
? Interesting topic, relevant to management research.
? Aim and research questions defined with sufficient clarity.
60% to 69% ? Marginal contribution to knowledge. ? Generally valid and relevant topic.
? Reasonably clearly stated aim and research questions, but with some shortcomings in clarity of purpose and associated objectives.
0% to 59% ? Does not make a contribution to knowledge. ? Poor selection and/or presentation of topic.
? Major weaknesses in the framing and presentation of aims and research questions; major inconsistencies about purpose and associated objectives.
Content and Structure of your Dissertation and Marking Criteria 7 | Page

UU- MBA711: Dissertation
Literature Review (25%)
Guiding questions:
• Has a comprehensive range of RELEVANT literature been used to discuss relevant concepts, models, and theories?
• Are the sources used up to date, and of sufficient academic weight?
• Does the dissertation give evidence of a critical attitude towards source material?
• Arethe keythemes and issues surrounding the research questions clearlydrawn from the literature?
• Have sources been acknowledged and referenced fairly and properly? Is the bibliography at the end of the dissertation complete and in the APAstyle?
90% to 100% ? Detailed and thorough literature review.
? Superlative analysis, synthesis and evaluation of material.
? Development of a coherent theoretical framework, potentiallyto the standard of publishable work.
80% to 89% ? Detailed and thorough literature review.
? Excellent analysis, synthesis and evaluation of material. ? Sound theoretical framework developed.
70% to 79% ? Suitable literature review demonstrating some level ofsynthesis of secondary sources.
? Generally sound theoretical framework.
60% to 69% ? Generally satisfactory literature review but with some flawsand omissions.
? Adequate analysis and evaluation of material, limited evidence of synthesis.
? Generally appropriate theoretical framework but is notcomplete and/or justified.
0% to 59% ? Unsatisfactory literature review.
? Rudimentary analysis and evaluation of material.
? Poor or inadequate theoretical basis for the research based upon incomplete and fragmented literature review.
Content and Structure of your Dissertation and Marking Criteria 8 | Page

UU- MBA711: Dissertation
Research Design and Methodology (15%)
Guiding questions:
Is there a clear rationale for the research design and methodology?
• Are the research methods fully described and the advantages and disadvantages of chosen methods discussed?
• Are any constraints or limitations identified? • Are data analysis methods discussed?
• Is there evidence of care and accuracy in the data collection process? Are reliability and validity issues addressed?
• Has the methodology been critically evaluated in retrospect?
90% to 100% ? Original approach to study.
? Exceptional design and execution, of high professional standard. ? Appropriate methodology clearly and logically justified.
80% to 89% ? Original approach to study.
? Careful design and execution. ? Appropriate methodology.
70% to 79% ? Appropriate approach to study.
? Adequately designed and executed study.
? Generally appropriate selection of methodological approachand research design; provides justification for the selected methodology and demonstrates understanding of limitations of research design.
60% to 69% ? Generally appropriate approach to study.
? Generally adequate design and execution but may containminor weaknesses in approach.
? Generally appropriate selection of methodological approachand research design with potential minor inconsistencies; provides justification for the selected methodology, although potentially incomplete and demonstrates some understanding of limitations of research design.
0% to 59% ? Unsatisfactory study design and execution.
? Inappropriate methodology and research design; fails to justify adoption of selected methodology. No evidence of understanding of limitations of research design. Does not align research question with methodological approach.
Content and Structure of your Dissertation and Marking Criteria 9 | Page

UU- MBA711: Dissertation
Critical Evaluation of Secondary Data (20%)
Guiding questions:
• Is all data presented relevant to aims and objectives?
• Is the analysis thorough and appropriate to the data collected, depending on the research methods used? For example:
o Do the appendices contain a data matrix, and details of analysis undertaken? Is analysis correctly performed and interpreted?
o Has the validity and reliability of the sources been addressed?
• Are the findings presented clearly and interestingly for the reader, with usefultables and charts embedded in the text and with the appendices being used appropriately for bulky and/or less interesting/essential data?
• Have the findings been discussed and evaluated?
• Have the findings of the research been compared and contrasted with findings, theories, models, and concepts derived from the literature review?
90% to 100% ? Appropriate data analysed using well-defined and clearly justified techniques.
? High quality analysis, demonstrating coherent and compelling interpretation of the data.
? Well-organised and strongly communicative presentation of results and analysis.
80% to 89% ? Appropriate data analysed using appropriate analytical techniques
? High quality analysis, demonstrating clear interpretation of the data.
? Well-organised and clear presentation of results and analysis.
70% to 79% ? Good effort to collect appropriate data.
? Relevant analysis and interpretation of data.
? Complete presentation of results and analysis.
60% to 69% ? Mainly appropriate data collection but potentially with some of the requisite data missing.
? Evidence of satisfactory data analysis but may contain some weaknesses.
? Useful presentation of results and analysis but may lack detail or clarity.
0% to 59% ? Inappropriate data or failure to collect the required data; little evidence of independent research.
? Insufficient or no analysis; inconsistencies in the analysis; inadequate or no presentation of results.
Content and Structure of your Dissertation and Marking Criteria 10 | Page

UU- MBA711: Dissertation
Conclusions and Recommendations (15%)
Guiding questions:
• Have the research objectives (research questions) been reviewed and addressed? • Do the conclusions and recommendations follow on from the findings? Are they
well-grounded in the evidence and arguments presented?
• Has the relevance of the conclusions for management been discussed?
• Are the conclusions and recommendations discussed in context, and are they more widely applicable?
90% to 100% ? High quality, thorough discussion; fully justified and logical conclusions and recommendations.
? Thorough understanding of the importance of the results in the context of the theoretical framework.
? Complete understanding of all material dealt with.
? Clear signs of independent critical ability and original thought in dealing with the critical issues.
80% to 89% ? Reflective discussion, defensible conclusions and recommendations.
? Thorough understanding of all material dealt with. ? Evidence of independent critical ability.
70% to 79% ? Logical discussion, clear conclusions and recommendations. ? Good understanding of most material dealt with.
? Ability to reflect upon weaknesses in approach.
60% to 69% ? Discussion generally logical but mainly superficial; conclusions flawed and recommendations weak or omitted.
? Generally good understanding of most material dealt with. ? Limited reflection upon weaknesses in approach.
0% to 59% ? Weak discussion; findings and conclusions inaccurate, inconsistent or incomplete; recommendations indefensible, unrelated to findings and conclusions or omitted.
? Superficial understanding of most material dealt with.
? Does not demonstrate evidence of independent critical ability. Does not reflect upon weaknesses in approach.
Content and Structure of your Dissertation and Marking Criteria 11 | Page

UU- MBA711: Dissertation
Structure, and Writing (10%)
Guiding questions:
• Is the overall style and presentation of the dissertation in accordance with that specifiedinthedescriptions; i.e.,coverpages,titlepage,word count, spacing,chapter and section headings, pagination, appropriate font, bolding, italics
• Are all citations and references properly formatted in the appropriate referencing style?
• Is the title concise and appropriate?
• Is the abstract a concise (1 page) summary of the main aims, methodology,findings, and conclusions?
• Is the contents page clear, concise, and logically numbered? Are appendices, tables, and figures numbered and listed in the contents page?
• Are all appendices referred to in the text?
• Is the writing clear and in an appropriate academic style? • Is the standard of written English acceptable?
• Has the dissertation been spelling, and grammar checked?
90% to 100% ? Outstanding presentation.
? Exemplary use of academic English, sound and consistent writing style.
? As good a piece of work as could be expected at this stage of development; of a near publishable quality.
80% to 89% ? Excellent presentation.
? Very good use of academic English, sound and consistent writing style.
? Would require refocusing before reaching publishable state.
70% to 79% ? Good presentation.
? GooduseofacademicEnglish; clearandconsistentwritingstyle, though not of a publishable standard.
60% to 69% ? Satisfactory presentation.
? Reasonably good use of English; generally clear writing style with few weaknesses, though not of a publishable standard.
0% to 69% ? Unsatisfactory presentation.
? Generally poor use of English with significant errors and weaknesses that inhibit readability.
? Significantly below publishable standard.
Content and Structure of your Dissertation and Marking Criteria 12 | Page

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Class Homework (1)GEOP – 555Term – 212Due date: 21 March

Class Homework (1)
GEOP – 555
Term – 212
Due date: 21 March 2022
The given excel sheet is based on Eltom et al. (2016) paper. The sheet lists the lab measurement of 156 samples collected from two locations near Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. A total of 87 measurement and relations are given for each sample.
The target of this study is to predict the depositional environments, referring to Eltom et al. (2016) “the interpretation of depositional environments provides important information to understand facies distribution and geometry. The classical approach to interpret depositional environments principally relies on the analysis of lithofacies, biofacies and stratigraphic data, among others. An alternative method, based on geochemical data (chemical element data), is advantageous because it can simply, reproducibly and efficiently interpret and refine the interpretation of the depositional environment of carbonate strata. Here we geochemically analyze and statistically model carbonate samples (n=156) from seven sections of the Arab-D reservoir outcrop analog of central Saudi Arabia, to determine whether the elemental signatures (major, trace and rare earth elements [REEs]) can be effectively used to predict depositional environments.”
In this homework, we shall apply an unsupervised technique (K-mean and/or DBSCAN) to cluster the given data into different groups, each group (cluster) represents a lithofacies associated with a different depositional environment.
Note that:
• Set 62 is the rare earth element (REE)
• Set 63 is the light rare earth element (LREE)
• Set 64 is the medium rare earth element (MREE)
• Set 65 is the heavy rare earth element (HREE)
Questions and Requirements
1. Study the given data before you start the process to select which features should be excluded from the process
2. Select a number of features for the clustering process
3. Apply K-mean to cluster the given data
4. Use an evaluation approach to identify the optimum number of clusters (elbow is an example, but you can use other approaches such as (va = evalclusters(data,idx,’CalinskiHarabasz’);) in MatLab.
5. Apply DBSCAN on the same data set using the same features (Matlab code is provided)
6. Compare the K-mean and the DBSCAN results
7. Comment on the results
Expected Deliverables
A short report contains at least the following
1. A list of the excluded features. Give reason(s) for the exclusion
2. A table and/or a figure shows the K-mean result
3. Describe your final clusters and explain the main characteristics of each cluster
4. The result of the elbow test (Figure and explanation)
5. A table and/or a figure shows the DBSCAN result
6. What are the similarities and differences between K-mean and the DBSCAN results
7. Short conclusions
Expectations
• Text should be free from typos, spelling errors, and grammar errors
• Figure should be in a good shape and good resolution.
• Figures should have axis scale, labels, titles, and Figure captions.
• Report should be divided at least into “Summary”, “Testing and selecting features”, “K-mean result”, “DBSCAN results”, “K-mean vs. DBSCAN”, and “Conclusions”.

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

I need questions 8 and 9Risk Analysis and Modelling (FR2208)CourseworkAvailable

I need questions 8 and 9
Risk Analysis and Modelling (FR2208)
Coursework
Available online: Thursday 24 February 2022 Submission deadline: Friday 11 March 2022
Preface and practicalities
This coursework is about modelling and analysing the risk(s) of an equity strategy. You will be asked to perform several analyses using real-world data and present your results in a concise report. There is a total of 10 questions in this coursework, each carrying equal weight, and the maximum mark attainable is 100%. The choice of software for conducting the analyses is R(Excel is allowed if you believe it is necessary). Useful R-code is provided on page 3.
This coursework is to be solved strictly within the assigned groups. Questions can be posted on the accompanying Moodle forum. Private conversations about the coursework with anyone besides i) the members of your coursework group or ii) the lecturer will be regarded as fraud and treated as such. Any signs of conversations about the coursework across groups or copying of results across groups will result in a total mark of 0% to all members of the involved groups.
Please make specific references to the appropriate sections/pages in the module’s textbook and/or the lecture notes (‘slides’) whenever possible and adequate. The same applies to any other material (other textbooks, academic papers, newspaper articles, etc.) you use in answering the questions. Rely on dubious/folklore-based sources like Investopedia at your own risk/peril.
Some questions will ask you to comment on or interpret your results using no more than a specified maximum word count. You are welcome to use any number of words up to the maximum in your answer. However, if you use more words than the specified maximum, the mark for the entire question will be reduced by the percentage of words above the maximum allowed. Please indicate the number of words used in your answer to each question with a maximum word count adjacent to your answer of the question. Any discrepancies between the stated and the actual number of words will ber egarded as an error and will result in deduction of marks.
Please submit the coursework in a single PDF fi le. Other file formats (such as Word) will not be accepted as they do not allow for direct marking on Moodle. The maximum page count for the report itself (excluding submission forms, front pages, references, etc.) is 10 single-spaced standard pages using a font size of 12 or above. You are not required to attach appendices etc. to your report document containing code or spreadsheet screenshots etc., but you may do so if you wish to. Please indicate the group number on your report’s front page, the names and student numbers of all group members, and (if applicable) the names of any inactive or non-participating group members. Late submissions will result in a total mark of 0% to all group members.
Coursework setting
We will model and analyse the risks of an equity strategy in the context of the price momentum (MOM) anomaly: Stocks that have had relatively high returns over the previous year (i.e., the previous year’s winners) have historically outperformed (i.e., generated higher average subsequent returns than) stocks that have had relatively low returns over the previous year (i.e., the previous year’s losers) in a manner not explained by standard factor asset pricing models like the CAPM or Fama and French’s (1993) three-factor model (FF3).
Accompanying this coursework is a data file called “MOM and FF3 factors, 1969-2019.” The data file contains the monthly value (Value) in $ millions and the continuously compounded monthly return (Return) in decimals per month (so that, e.g., 0.01 means 1% per month) for a MOM strategy over the period from the end of December 1969 to the end of November 2019 (i.e., 50 years of monthly data). It also contains the monthly returns in decimals for the US stock market index in excess of the 1-month US Treasury bill rate (MKT) as well as Fama and French’s (1993) size (SMB) and value (HML) factors.
The MOM strategy buys a diversified portfolio of winner stocks and short-sells a diversified portfolio of loser stocks, but it does so within each of the small-stock and big-stock universes in the US. Specifically, at the end of each month, all US stocks are assigned to one of two portfolios, labeled small and big, based on their total market capitalisation, where the breakpoint is the median market capitalisation. At the same time, all US stocks are assigned to one of three portfolio, labeled loser, neutral, and winner, based on their cumulative stock return over the previous year, where the breakpoints are the 30th and 70th percentiles of the distribution. The portfolios are market capitalisation-weighted and rebalanced at the end of each month. The intersection gives a total of 6 portfolios; 3 within each of the two size universes:
Cumulative stock return over the previous year (30% loser, 40% neutral, 30% winner)
Size (50% small, 50% big) Small loser Small neutral Small winner
Big loser Big neutral Big winner
Within each size universe, we construct a long-short strategy that buys the winner portfolio and shorts the loser portfolio. The MOM strategy is then the simple average of the long-short strategies from each of the two size universes. Constructing the long-short strategies separately within the size universes and then averaging helps to make the MOM strategy size-neutral (i.e., it does not have a particular size tilt towards either small or big stocks).
The initial investment (the strategy’s starting value) is 1.0000 (in $ millions). The monthly strategy values cover the period from the end of December 1969 to the end of November 2019, while the monthly (continuously compounded) strategy returns cover the period from the end of January 1970 to the end of November 2019.
Useful R-code
If you are interested in learning to program and do statistical analysis in R, then this coursework is an excellent opportunity to do so. Below is a very short introduction with useful function that are relevant to the coursework and beyond.
Importing csv-files in R can be done using the function read.csv. To import a csv-file and store it as a data.frame with the name ‘D’, use the command D – read.csv(“_path_”) where _path_ is the path of the csv-file on your computer. You can obtain the path of any file by dragging the file into the R-console. To access the variable (or column) X within the data.frame D, use the command D$X. To access the first entry for the variable X within the data.frame D, use the command D$X[1]. To access the last entry for the variable X within the data.frame D, use the command D$X[nrow(D)].
To access all but the first entry for the variable X within the data.frame D, use the command D$X[-1]. Finally, to specify the variable X within the data.frame D as a date-variable, use the command D$X – as.Date(D$X).
R has numerous built in functions for computing standard statistics and manipulating variables like mean, var, sd, sum, prod, length, exp, log (log is the natural logarithm in R, which we have denoted ln in the lecture notes), cumsum (i.e., a cumulative sum), and so on. All of these functions have arguments to exclude missing (or NA = not available) values, typically in the form of na.rm=T (i.e., setting the function’s remove NA-argument to TRUE). For instance, to calculate the mean of X from data.frame D while removing its missing values simply type mean(D$X, na.rm=T). To define a new variable M as the mean of X from the data.frame D, while removing the missing values in X before calculating its mean, use the command M – mean(D$X, na.rm=T).
Univariate and multivariate linear regressions can be done using the function lm. Getting detailed output for linear regressions (i.e., t-statistics for the intercept as well as slope-coefficients, residual standard error, R-squared values, etc.) can be prompted by using the function summary in conjunction with the function lm. For instance, to get detailed output for a linear regression of the variable Y from the data.frame D onto the variables X and Z also from the data.frame D, use summary(lm(D$Y ~ D$X + D$Z)).
You can read more about the R-functions read.csv, mean, and lm, as well as see examples of how to use them, by prompting their help-page using the commands ?read.csv, ?mean, and ?lm. The same applies to all R-functions, which all have an accompanying help-page with examples. Furthermore, there are many web forums and blogs specifically targeting R-users where you can find code examples and clever solutions to common problems. The easiest way to find these is to do a Google search for the task you are trying to accomplish or the problem you are experiencing initiated with by “R:” as in “R: doing a for-loop” or “R: adding a line to a plot.”
Questions
Question 1 (10%)
a) Estimate and report the ML parameters, measured per annum, of a BSM model fitted to the strategy. In doing so, be very clear about the estimation procedure you apply, including any distributional assumptions, the definition of the sampling times, the sampling frequency, and what the resulting estimates are measured in. Using no more than 100 words, interpret the estimates.
b) Use the estimated BSM parameters to calculate the monthly expected value of the strategy at each date (i.e., month end) in the sample period conditional on its value at the beginning of the sample period. Report the expected value of the strategy for
i) 31 December 1970, ii) 31 December 1994, iii) 31 November 2019.
c) Make a plot with the date (month-ends) on the x-axis and the strategy’s value on the y-axis. Add the expected monthly value as a function of the date to the plot and report the resulting plot. Finally, using no more than 100 words, describe and interpret the plot.
Question 2 (10%)
Suppose you are currently standing at the end of the sample period.
a) Calculate and report the expectation and standard deviation of the value in 12 months.
b) Determine and report the distribution of the continuously compounded annual return over the next month and over the next 12 months. Using no more than 50 words, comment on and explain any similarities and/or differences between these two distributions.
c) Calculate and report the return, r, such that there is only a 1% probability that the continuously compounded annual return over the next 12 months is below r.
d) Calculate and report the value, V, such that there is only a 1% probability that the value in 12 months is below V.
Question 3 (10%)
If X is a normally distributed random variable with mean m and variance v2, then it holds for a given probability 0 q 1 that
When q = 0.05 = 5%, we have N–1(0.975) = 1.96 (using NORMSINV in Excel or using qnorm in R). There is therefore a 95% probability that X is between L = m – 1.96v and U = m + 1.96v, where L and U stand for the Lower and Upper bound, respectively. The interval from L to U is therefore called a 95% confidence interval for X.
Suppose you are currently standing at the end of the sample period.
a) Calculate and report a 95% confidence interval for the continuously compounded annual return over the next 12 months.
b) Calculate and report a 95% confidence interval for the strategy’s value in 12 months.
Question 4 (10%)
If X is a normally distributed random variable with mean m and variance v2, then the conditional expectation of X given that X is below some value x is
.
Also, if Y is a log-normally distributed random variable, such that X = ln Y is normally distributed with mean m and variance v2, then the conditional expectation of Y given that Y is below some value y 0 is
.
Suppose you are currently standing at the end of the sample period.
a) Calculate and report the conditional expectation of the continuously compounded annual return over the next 12 months given that it is below –30% per annum.
b) Calculate and report the conditional expectation of the strategy’s value in 12 months given that it is below $17 million.
Question 5 (10%)
Suppose you are currently standing at the end of the sample period and that the risk-free rate for a maturity of m months is m times the current 1-month risk-free rate.
a) Calculate the current price of an at-the-money European put option on the strategy with 6 months to expiry.
b) Calculate the total loss on the put, from the viewpoint of the seller, which has only a 1% probably of being exceeded.
Question 6 (10%)
Let be the strategy’s (continuously compounded) monthly return per month for month t
(specifically, from the end of month t-1 to the end of month t). Recall that the strategy is long-short,
i.e., its return is the difference between the returns of two portfolio positions. According to the Fama and French three-factor (FF3) model, such a return can be described by the linear regression
MKTt + sSMBt + hHMLt +?t,
where ??t has mean zero and standard deviation ???? for all t.
a) Using no more than 50 words, explain why we do not subtract the risk-free rate from the strategy’s return (i.e., from the left-hand side) in the above regression.
b) Estimate and report the linear regression parameters of a FF3 model fitted to the strategy along with the model’s R2-value. Also, report the t-test statistics for the estimated intercept and slope.
c) Using no more than 100 words, describe and interpret these results.
Question 7 (10%)
A prime application of factor asset pricing models like the CAPM or FF3 is the fact that they, in principle, provide a recipe for optimally hedging a particular asset or strategy against systematic risk(s) [or, more agnostically, against the common movements in stocks captured by the factor(s)]. We will now study the performance of a hedged version of the long-short strategy, where the hedging is done according to the FF3 model fitted in Question 6.
According to the FF3 model, the hedged strategy’s (continuously compounded) monthly return per month for month t is given by
MKTt sSMBt hHMLt.
That is, we hedge the strategy by taking offsetting positions in the MKT, SMB, and HML factors, where the size of each offsetting position is the negative of the strategy’s estimated loading (slope) on the corresponding factor.
a) Prove that another expression for the hedged strategy’s (continuously compounded) monthly return per month for month t is given by
.
Using no more than 200 words, interpret this expression and discuss its implications.
b) Calculate the hedged strategy’s continuously compounded monthly return per month for each month-end in the sample period. Report it for:
i) 31 December 1970, ii) 31 December 1994, iii) 31 November 2019.
c) Given rth, the hedged strategy’s value at the end of any month t 0 is
Sth = Sth 1erth.
Since also Sth 1 = Sth 2erth 1, we can write the above as
.

Continuing this recursively, we get
,
i.e., the hedged strategy’s value at the end of month t 0 is the initial investment, , continuously compounded forward to month t 0 at a rate equal to the cumulative sum of the hedged strategy’s monthly continuously compounded return per month up to month t 0.
Calculate the monthly value of the hedged strategy for each month-end in the sample period starting with an initial investment of 1 (in $ millions). Report the value of the hedged strategy for:
i) 31 December 1970, ii) 31 December 1994, iii) 31 November 2019.
Add the value of the hedged strategy as a function of the date to the plot you made in Question 1 and report the resulting plot (adjust the axes as you see fit). Finally, using no more than 100 words, describe and interpret the plot.
Question 8 (10%)
Consider again the hedged strategy defined in Question 7.
a) Suppose that ??t is normally distributed with mean zero and standard deviation ???? for all t.
Determine and report the distribution of the hedged strategy’s (continuously compounded) monthly return per month.
b) Report the ML parameters, measured per annum, of a BSM model fitted to the hedged strategy. Using no more than 100 words, compare the estimates for the hedged strategy with the ones for the unhedged strategy from Question 1, and discuss the implications.
c) Use the estimated BSM parameters from Question 8b) to calculate the monthly expected value of the hedged strategy at each date (month-end) in the sample period conditional on its value at the beginning of the sample period. Add this expected monthly value as a function of the date to the plot you made in Question 7c) and report the plot (adjust the axes as you see fit). Also,
report the expected value of the hedged strategy on
i) 31 December 1970, ii) 31 December 1994, iii) 31 November 2019.
Finally, using no more than 100 words, describe and interpret the plot.
Question 9 (10%)
A commonly used measure of a strategy’s downside risk is the so-called maximum drawdown, which can be defined as the maximum loss between a strategy’s most recent peak value (i.e., its latest highest value) to a subsequent valley (i.e., its latest low). Specifically, a strategy’s drawdown (DD) at time t can be defined as its current percentage loss relative to its most recent peak value, i.e.,
Vt VtPeak
DDt = VtPeak ,
where Vt is the strategy’s value at time t and VtPeak is the strategy’s most recent peak value. From this, the strategy’s maximum drawdown (MDD) at time t is defined as the latest maximum of the negative of DD up to time t, i.e.,
MDDt =max{ DDs}.
s t
a) Calculate the peak, drawdown, and maximum drawdown for each of the unhedged and hedged strategies at each date (month-end) during the sample period. Make a plot with the date (monthends) on the x-axis and the unhedged strategy’s monthly maximum drawdown on the y-axis. Add the hedged strategy’s monthly maximum drawdown as a function of the date to the plot in a different colour and report the resulting plot. Report the peak, drawdown, and maximum drawdown for each of the unhedged and hedged strategies on the following dates:
i) 31 December 1970, ii) 31 December 1994, iii) 31 November 2019.
b) Using no more than 100 words, describe and interpret the plot and results.
Question 10 (10%)
Using no more than 200 words, conclude on the performance of the hedged vs. unhedged strategy.

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"