Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice

/in /by

Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice

Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice

Practice Question:

 

Date:

 

 

Article Number

  

 

Author and Date

  

 

Evidence Type

  

Sample, Sample Size, Setting

 Findings That Help Answer the EBP Question  

Observable Measures

  

 

Limitations

  

Evidence Level, Quality
Article ID 3634548 Wenjie X, Hui Hu, Yanjun Mao

2021

 randomized controlled trial

 

 78 Patients, the patients were divided into two groups, the intervention group and the control group.

 

In the intervention group the primary nurse was in charge of the patient evaluation to follow up and took on the one on one education top help in the self-healthcare management of the patients. In the control group the patients only received routine care.

Hospital Settings

 

· N/A

 Patient’s sleep quality, survival quality, mobility, and life quality in two groups were significantly improved. The study aims at determining the impact of transitional care to the quality of life of the patients with COPD. The patients in the study were divided into two groups: intervention and control (39 cases each). The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Quality of Life Scale Abbreviated Version (QOL-BREF), Activity of Daily Life Scale (Barthel index), St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), and COPD Assessment Test were used to assess patient anxiety and depression symptoms, sleep quality, survival quality, mobility, and life quality at admission and three months after discharge (CAT). First and foremost, based on a questionnaire survey, this study only looked at 3-month TC results. As a result, the long-term impact, such as readmission rate, could not be reliably determined Level I, Good Quality: Reasonably consistent results; sufficient sample size for the study

design; some control, fairly definitive conclusions; reasonably consistent

recommendations based on fairly comprehensive literature review that includes

some reference to scientific evidence
       

 

 

· N/A

 Improvement of survival quality of patients in the intervention group was markedly greater than that in the control group   It’s also important to evaluate the patient’s drug compliance.  
       

 

 

· N/A

     The study only took samples from a hospital, which aren’t always representative of patient conditions in other areas.  
       

 

 

· N/A

     The morbidity of COPD varies depending on the location  
       

 

 

· N/A

     Sample size in this study is small, the patient’s characteristics may have an impact on the findings.  
       

 

 

· N/A

        
       

 

 

· N/A

        

 

Attach a reference list with full citations of articles reviewed for this Practice question.

Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice

Appendix G: Individual Evidence Summary Tool

 

The Johns Hopkins Hospital/ The Johns Hopkins University

2

Directions for Use of the Individual Evidence Summary Tool

Purpose

This form is used to document the results of evidence appraisal in preparation for evidence synthesis. The form provides the EBP team with documentation of the sources of evidence used, the year the evidence was published or otherwise communicated, the information gathered from each evidence source that helps the team answer the EBP question, and the level and quality of each source of evidence.

 

Article Number

Assign a number to each reviewed source of evidence. This organizes the individual evidence summary and provides an easy way to reference articles.

 

Author and Date

Indicate the last name of the first author or the evidence source and the publication/communication date. List both author/evidence source and date.

 

Evidence Type

Indicate the type of evidence reviewed (for example: RCT, meta-analysis, mixed methods, quaLitative, systematic review, case study, narrative literature review).

ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS 

Sample, Sample Size, and Setting

Provide a quick view of the population, number of participants, and study location.

 

Findings That Help Answer the EBP Question

Although the reviewer may find many points of interest, list only findings that directly apply to the EBP question.

 

Observable Measures

QuaNtitative measures or variables are used to answer a research question, test a hypothesis, describe characteristics, or determine the effect, impact, or influence. QuaLitative evidence uses cases, context, opinions, experiences, and thoughts to represent the phenomenon of study.

 

Limitations

Include information that may or may not be within the text of the article regarding drawbacks of the piece of evidence. The evidence may list limitations, or it may be evident to you, as you review the evidence, that an important point is missed or the sample does not apply to the population of interest.

 

Evidence Level and Quality

Using information from the individual appraisal tools, transfer the evidence level and quality rating into this column.

Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100
Use the following coupon code :
NURSING10

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Lois, who is in the last stages of breast cancer, was recently admitted into a hospice program.

/in /by

Lois, who is in the last stages of breast cancer, was recently admitted into a hospice program.

Lois, who is in the last stages of breast cancer, was recently admitted into a hospice program.

Chapter 14 – Assignment

SCENARIO – Lois, who is in the last stages of breast cancer, was recently admitted into a hospice program. Her husband Henry, is relieved to have a hospice nurse come into their home and help with the care of his wife. After Lois had been receiving care for a week, Henry asked when he should take Lois into the hospital out-patient department for more chemotherapy. The hospice nurse said, “I thought that you understood that since treatments would no longer help Lois and she would ultimately die, that she would not receive any more treatments once she entered the Hospice program.” Henry said he did not understand this and insisted that he wanted everything done to save Lois.

Instructions:

  1. Read the scenario above and then, answer the following questions:
    1. How could this misunderstanding have been avoided?
    2. What discussions should Lois and Henry have had with each other before Lois went into the hospice program?
    3. What could hospice programs do to better inform the general public of their purpose?
  2. Your response should be:
    • One (1) pg.
    • Typed according to APA style for margins, formatting and spacing standards

ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS 

You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes.

Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages.

Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor.

The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.

Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100
Use the following coupon code :
NURSING10

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Assessment Tools And Diagnostic Tests In Adults.

/in /by

  • attachment

    READINGRESOURCES.docx

Learning Resources

 

Ball, J. W., Dains, J. E., Flynn, J. A., Solomon, B. S., & Stewart, R. W. (2019). Seidel’s guide to physical examination: An interprofessional approach (9th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Mosby.

· Chapter 3, “Examination Techniques and Equipment”

This chapter explains the physical examination techniques of inspection, palpation, percussion, and auscultation. This chapter also explores special issues and equipment relevant to the physical exam process.

 

· Chapter 8, “Growth and Nutrition”

In this chapter, the authors explain examinations for growth, gestational age, and pubertal development. The authors also differentiate growth among the organ systems.

 

· Chapter 5, “Recording Information”  (Previously read in Week 1)

This chapter provides rationale and methods for maintaining clear and accurate records. The text also explores the legal aspects of patient records.

 

Ball, J. W., Dains, J. E., Flynn, J. A., Solomon, B. S., & Stewart, R. W. (2019). Student checklist: Health history guide. In Seidel’s guide to physical examination (9th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Mosby.

Credit Line:  Seidel’s Guide to Physical Examination, 9th Edition by Ball, J. W., Dains, J. E., Flynn, J. A., Solomon, B. S., & Stewart, R. W. Copyright 2019 by Elsevier Health Sciences. Reprinted by permission of Elsevier Health Sciences via the Copyright Clearance Center.

 

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2021, April 9). Childhood overweight & obesity. http://www.cdc.gov/obesity/childhood/ This website provides information about overweight and obese children. Additionally, the website provides basic facts about obesity and strategies to counteracting obesity.

 

Chaudhry, M. A. I., & Nisar, A. (2017). Escalating health care cost due to unnecessary diagnostic testing. Mehran University Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, (3), 569.

 

This study explores the escalating healthcare cost due the unnecessary use of diagnostic testing. Consider the impact of health insurance coverage in each state and how nursing professionals must be cognizant when ordering diagnostics for different individuals.

 

Dains, J. E., Baumann, L. C., & Scheibel, P. (2019). Advanced health assessment and clinical diagnosis in primary care (6th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Mosby.

Credit Line: Advanced Health Assessment and Clinical Diagnosis in Primary Care, 6th Edition by Dains, J.E., Baumann, L. C., & Scheibel, P. Copyright 2019 by Mosby. Reprinted by permission of Mosby via the Copyright Clearance Center.

 

· Chapter 1, “Clinical Reasoning, Evidence-Based Practice, and Symptom Analysis”

 

This chapter introduces the diagnostic process, which includes performing an analysis of the symptoms and then formulating and testing a hypothesis. The authors discuss how becoming an expert clinician takes time and practice in developing clinical judgment.

 

 

Noble, H., & Smith, J. (2015) Issues of validity and reliability in qualitative research . Evidence Based Nursing, 18(2), pp. 34–35.

 

 

Nyante, S. J., Benefield, T. S., Kuzmiak, C. M., Earnhardt, K., Pritchard, M., & Henderson, L. M. (2021). Population‐level impact of coronavirus disease 2019 on breast cancer screening and diagnostic procedures. Cancer, 127(12), 2111–2121. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.33460

ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS 

 

Seidel, H. M., Ball, J. W., Dains, J. E., Flynn, J. A., Solomon, B. S., & Stewart, R. W. (2011). History subjective data checklist. In Mosby’s guide to physical examination (7th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Mosby.

Credit Line: Mosby’s Guide to Physical Examination, 7th Edition by Seidel, H. M., Ball, J. W., Dains, J. E., Flynn, J. A., Solomon, B. S., & Stewart, R. W. Copyright 2011 by Elsevier. Reprinted by permission of Elsevier via the Copyright Clearance Center.

 

This History Subjective Data Checklist was published as a companion to Seidel’s Guide to Physical Examination (8th ed.) by Ball, J. W., Dains, J. E., & Flynn, J.A. Copyright Elsevier (2015). From https://evolve.elsevier.com

 

Sullivan, D. D. (2019). Guide to clinical documentation (3rd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis.

· Chapter 2, “The Comprehensive History and Physical Exam” (Previously read in Week 1)

· Chapter 5, “Pediatric Preventative Care Visits” (pp. 91 101)

 

Chapman, W., & Marshall, S. (2020). Optimising bowel preparation before colonoscopy. British Journal of Nursing, 29(Sup13), S3–S12. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2020.29.Sup13.S3

 

Steffenssen, M. W., Al-Najami, I., & Baatrup, G. (2019). Patient-reported minor adverse events after colonoscopy: a systematic review. Acta Oncologica, 58, S22–S28. https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2019.1574979

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Philosophy Of Nursing. – nursing homework essays

/in /by

Philosophy Of Nursing.

Philosophy Of Nursing.

See attached. It is a 7 pages long assignment

  • attachment

    PhilosophyofNursing.docx

 

This information is also found in the Student Handbook.

Develop a personal philosophy focusing on the central concerns of nursing. The fundamental elements are to be included; others may be chosen if desired. Use at least two references to support your point of view. One reference must be research based from a nursing journal.

A philosophy of nursing is by its very nature, a very individualized, personal statement based on subjective life experiences and adoption of particular world views. As such, the grading of this project will rest solely on the “depth and breadth” of the philosophical inquiry guided by the questions. Total points possible for this project are 15. This is not a simple exercise. Put thought into this. It is your personal philosophy of nursing. Please answer the questions below: Personal Knowing 1. Examine your personal beliefs and baccalaureate nursing education.

(Write an overall introduction of your personal beliefs about being a baccalaureate prepared nurse). Ontological Questioning 2. To develop a personal philosophy of nursing: one must focus on the central concerns of the discipline. This would include, for example, the nature of human beings and the life process. From the perspective of nursing, attempt to answer the following questions which reflect the fundamental elements of nursing and any others you may choose to incorporate:

a. What is society – of whom is it composed, and what is the nature of the relationships among its constituents including self in the role of the nurse? Where do you, as a professional nurse, fit into the picture and landscape of community? b. What are your central beliefs about the individual person, and that individual’s potential? The individual’s ability to learn, change, and heal? The family? The community? Your role as a professional nurse in these processes and relationships? c. What constitutes the environment? How do human beings and the environment interact? What contextual importance does it have for the focus of the discipline of nursing. d. What is your view(s) of health? Is it a continuum? A unidirectional phenomenon? A state? A process? Achieved/maintained alone or in unison with others? e. How do illness and wellness relate to health? f. What is the central reason for the existence of nursing and your calling to it? g. Who is the recipient of your nursing call? h. How does self-discovery and knowledge development occur in nurse-client relationships. Empirical Knowing 3. From the perspective of a philosopher’s concern with knowledge, Epistemological attempt to answer the following questions that reflect the Questioning essential elements of the scientific discipline of nursing: a. What do you believe is the nursing process? b. From what cognitive base does the professional nurse operate? Critical thinking? Problem-solving methodology? c. How do you implement the nursing process as you define it? What is necessary in the application of knowledge? d. How is the theory base for nursing derived? e. What is the theoretical framework for the profession? Is there room for diversity of thought, or is unity conceptual? Ethical and Esthetic 4. From the philosopher’s concern with ethics and esthetics, attempt Knowing to answer the following questions reflecting the valuation elements of nursing:

a. What are the essential rights and responsibilities of the professional nurse? b. What are the essential rights and responsibilities of the recipient of nursing care? c. How do your beliefs about nursing guide the research, education, administration and practice components of your role as a professional nurse? d. What are the governing ethical principles in the delivery of nursing care and the conduct of nursing research? e. What are your beliefs about the educational requirements and the focus of education for the practice of the profession? f. What are your beliefs about the teaching-learning process? g. What do you believe is needed for your continued development of esthetic knowing or responsiveness in nurse-client interactions?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Student:________________________________________________Date___________________

 

Criteria 3 2 1 0
Personal Knowing Personal philosophy of nursing written from a generalist nurse perspective Written from a specialty nurse perspective Vague references to nursing Paper does not address nursing
Ontological Questioning Includes all questions and provides an in-depth reflection of self Includes all questions but there is no in-depth reflection of self Not all questions answered Does not include
Empirical Knowing Includes all questions and provides an in-depth reflection of self Includes all questions but there is no in-depth reflection of self Not all questions answered Does not include
Ethical and Esthetic Knowing Includes all questions and provides an in-dept reflection of self Includes all questions but there is no –in-depth reflection of self Not all questions answered Does not include
APA 0 mistakes 1 -2 mistakes 3-4 mistakes More than 4 mistakes

 

ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS 

 

Comments: Total:________________________

 

 

 

 

 

 

___________________________________________________ ________________________

Faculty Signature Date

Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100
Use the following coupon code :
NURSING10

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Leadership In Public – nursing homework essays

/in /by

Leadership In Public

Leadership In Public

Review the topic material “Principles of the Ethical Practice of Public Health.” Consider the ethical principles through the Christian worldview lens and from the perspective of the moral and ethical obligations of public health professional to serve others. As a public health professional, there may be times when the Christian worldview is challenged, creating an ethical dilemma. Describe a situation in which a public health challenge presents a conflict with the Christian worldview. Explain how you would apply the “Principles of the Ethical Practice of Public Health” to approach this ethical dilemma and resolve the issue. In replies to peers, provide feedback on the proposed solution and identify additional alternatives for addressing the public health issue ethically.

ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS 

You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes.

Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages.

Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor.

The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.

Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100
Use the following coupon code :
NURSING10

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Individual Analyzing Published Research Article (IAPRA)

/in /by

Individual Analyzing Published Research Article (IAPRA)

Individual Analyzing Published Research Article (IAPRA)

Individual Analyzing Published Research Article (IAPRA)

Part I: Research Question, Purpose, Variables and Participants

Research Question

Clearly and concisely states your group research question as formulated in PICO format. Individual Analyzing Published Research Article (IAPRA)

Purpose of the Study

Describe the purpose/aim of the study as the author stated in the article: may cut & paste

Do NOT change or modify the purpose statement on the article

Variables

Identify study variables from the above stated Purpose of Study

Quantitative Study: Dependent & Independent Variables OR Descriptive, Qualitative Study: Variables of Interest

Participants

Enrollment: How did they recruit/enroll eligible participants in the study?

Inclusion & Exclusion Criteria: Describe Inclusion & Exclusion Criteria

Total Participant Numbers: Total numbers of participants in the study

Intervention Procedures/Obtaining Information Procedures

Quantitative Study

Intervention/Treatment Group

Describe the intervention contents given to Intervention group

Describe how the contents were given to Intervention group

Identify the person who provided Intervention contents to Intervention group

Control Group: If the study has Control Group

Describe the contents given to Control group

Describe how the contents were given to Control group

Identify the person who provided contents to Control group

  • attachment

    Articleonimprovingmedicationerror.pdf

  • attachment

    IAPRARUBRICEDITEDguidelines_July21.docx

  • attachment

    IAPRATemplatetousePartI.docx

6

 

Individual Analyzing Published Research Article (IAPRA) Paper

Purpose

· The purpose of this paper is to interpret the article as most relevant to the group topic.

· Use your article from your ITSS paper to write this paper.

 

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

CO 2: Apply research principles to the interpretation of the content of published research studies (PO#4 & 8).

CO 4: Evaluate published nursing research for credibility and clinical significance related to evidence-based

practice (PO#4 & 8).

 

Due Date (please see course calendar for specific dates/times)

· The Late Assignment Policy applies to this assignment.

 

Points Possible: 200 Points

 

Paper Preparation:

· It is NOT acceptable to use bullet-points in the body of text review paper.

· The paper must be PARAPHRASED with your OWN words with in-text citations.

· It is NOT acceptable to QUOTE article contents EXCEPT the Purpose of Study.

 

· Paper must include all required APA-Style/Format

· Do NOT leave blank for any of these review elements.

· Any review element left blank will get 0 point: If authors did not provide information or it was not applicable for certain elements, make note such as “No information was given” or “Not applicable”

 

 

PLAGIARISM: “Turnitin” Percentage

· Less than 25 percentage: Acceptable percentage.

· Turnitin Draft Submission Box

· Submit your draft of paper into Turnitin Draft Submission Box to check your percentage as many times as needed before you submit your final paper to designated Unit.

· If your Final paper has 25% or higher percentage, you must revise/modify your paper contents BEFORE you submit your paper due date and time.

· If your Final paper has 25% or higher percentage AT/AFTER you submit your final paper due date and time, Academic Integrity Violation Procedures will be initiated

 

Academic Integrity Violation Procedure

· Academic Integrity Violation letter will be sent to student

· Assignment Grade will be 0 point

· The violation case will be reviewed, and a further sanction will be determined by the Administrators

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Individual Analyzing Published Research Article (IAPRA)

 

Part I: Research Question, Purpose, Variables and Participants

Research Question

Clearly and concisely states your group research question as formulated in PICO format.

 

Purpose of the Study

Describe the purpose/aim of the study as the author stated in the article: may cut & paste

Do NOT change or modify the purpose statement on the article

 

Variables

Identify study variables from the above stated Purpose of Study

Quantitative Study: Dependent & Independent Variables OR Descriptive, Qualitative Study: Variables of Interest

 

Participants

Enrollment: How did they recruit/enroll eligible participants in the study?

 

Inclusion & Exclusion Criteria: Describe Inclusion & Exclusion Criteria

 

Total Participant Numbers: Total numbers of participants in the study

 

 

Intervention Procedures/Obtaining Information Procedures

Quantitative Study

Intervention/Treatment Group

Describe the intervention contents given to Intervention group

Describe how the contents were given to Intervention group

Identify the person who provided Intervention contents to Intervention group

 

Control Group: If the study has Control Group

Describe the contents given to Control group

Describe how the contents were given to Control group

Identify the person who provided contents to Control group

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS 

 

Grading Rubric & Description for IAPRA

Part I (80)
Research Question 5 · Accurately/Clearly states group’s Research Question as your group formulated
Purpose of Study 5 · Describe the purpose of the study as the author stated in the article.

· Do NOT change or modify the statement on the article
Variables 10

 

 

 · Identify study variables from the above stated Purpose of Study

· Quantitative Study: Dependent & Independent variables

 
Format 10 · Followed APA format for paper and in-text citations

 

Total Points: 200 Points

Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100
Use the following coupon code :
NURSING10

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

NR 602 Discussion Marginalized Women And Childbearing Families

/in /by

You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes.

Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages. NR 602 Discussion Marginalized Women And Childbearing Families

Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor.

The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS

Discussion Questions (DQ)

Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, include a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words.
Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source.
One or two sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words.
I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.

Weekly Participation

Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately.
In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies.
Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work).
Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.

APA Format and Writing Quality

Familiarize yourself with APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required).
Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation.
I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.

Use of Direct Quotes

I discourage overutilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Masters’ level and deduct points accordingly.
As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content.
It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.

ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS 

LopesWrite Policy

For assignments that need to be submitted to LopesWrite, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.
Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.
Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?
Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.

Late Policy

The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.
Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.
If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.
I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.
As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.

Communication

Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me:
Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.
Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.

Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100
Use the following coupon code :
NURSING10

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

How do you feel Martha should handle it when she is asked about the recent raise

/in /by

How do you feel Martha should handle it when she is asked about the recent raise

How do you feel Martha should handle it when she is asked about the recent raise

Compensation

Scenario: Martha, an RN that has been working at XYZ hospital for the last 20 years as a nurse and is very familiar with many aspects of the hospital at various levels of operation. She has served in administration when the hospital needed the coverage and also spent many years as a nurse working in the unit where she is working now.

Recently the hospital administration announced a 2% pay increase for all employees. Several of Martha’s colleagues believe that this is a generous raise especially considering the economy of the country which has been fairly poor lately. Others consider the raise a slap in the face considering the hard work that they all have contributed to in the last year.

Also, a successful JCAHO survey accreditation with accommodation only 3 months ago and several community awards pointing out the great work the nurses have done both in the hospital and in the community. Although these all demonstrated the dedication and outstanding nature of the nurses in the hospital, it has been a sticking point for many of the nurses because they feel that the 2% raise is being shared among other employees in the hospital, and, a 2% raise after taxes and divided by 2080 hours is about 25 cents an hour for most of the nurses in the hospital.

Furthermore, Martha being a trusted individual among administrators and nurses alike has found herself in a difficult position because many people in the hospital are asking her to weigh in on the recent raise.

ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS 

Instructions:

  1. Read the scenario above.
  2. Then, answer the following questions below:
    1. How do you feel Martha should handle it when she is asked about the recent raise?
    2. Is there any action that administration could find to recognize the nurses and the hard work they have performed in the last year?
    3. Is there any problem with these solutions that you might anticipate?
    4. Summarize what you have learned about internal/external rewards from the readings in the textbook, and then, discuss how this might fit into the scenario at XYZ hospital.
  3. Your response should be:
    • One (1) pg.
    • Typed into a Microsoft Word document according to APA style for margins, formatting, and spacing standards

 

 

Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100
Use the following coupon code :
NURSING10

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Quality Improvement Planning Committee – nursing homework essays

/in /by

Quality Improvement Planning Committee

Quality Improvement Planning Committee

Scenario – As a staff member who serves on the Quality Improvement Planning Committee, you are at a meeting to discuss the best way to share information about recent CQI data so that staff in the hospital can appreciate the value of the data. You need to identify pros and cons of methods the committee might use to assess and describe data for planning purposes.

The committee is mostly new, some members have limited experience. You and two other members have the most experience, so you three volunteer to help the others get up to speed as quickly as possible so that decisions can be made about steps to take with the data, and you can get to decisions about strategies. You make clear to the other committee members that 1) this is a team effort and 2) the team must engage hospital staff at all levels. “You comment, “We have tried to keep this to ourselves, thinking only we knew the best approaches, and we failed.” Staff do not feel engaged in CQI and complain about the extra work for which they see no value.

ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS 

Instructions:

  1. Read the scenario above and then, answer the following questions:
    1. What are some of the barriers that could be influencing limited staff engagements?
    2. What strategies might be used to overcome these barriers?
    3. What are the pros and cons of the methods used to assess and describe the need for change?
    4. What are the common reasons staff members resist change?
    5. Are standards of practice valuable sources of data for such a committee? Why or why not? Which ones might be of particular use?
  2. Your response should be:
    • One (1) pg.
    • Typed according to APA style for margins, formatting and spacing standards
    • Typed into a Microsoft Word document

You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes.

Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages.

Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor.

The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.

Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100
Use the following coupon code :
NURSING10

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

FDA-Approved Drug, One Off-Label Drug, And One Nonpharmacological Intervention In Children And Adolescents With Post Traumatic Stress Disorder

/in /by

FDA-Approved Drug, One Off-Label Drug, And One Nonpharmacological Intervention In Children And Adolescents With Post Traumatic Stress Disorder

  • attachment

    AssignmentInstructions6665.docx

1-Recommend one FDA-approved drug, one off-label drug, and one nonpharmacological intervention for treating POST TRAUMATIC STRESS DISSORDER (PTSD) in children and adolescents.

 

2-Explain the risk assessment you would use to inform your treatment decision making.

What are the risks and benefits of the FDA-approved medicine?

What are the risks and benefits of the off-label drug?

 

3-Explain whether clinical practice guidelines exist for this disorder (PTSD) and, if so, use them to justify your recommendations. If not, explain what information you would need to take into consideration.

 

4-Support your reasoning with at least three scholarly resources, one each on the FDA-approved drug, the off-label, and a non-medication intervention for the disorder. Attach the PDFs of your sources.

You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes.

Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages.

Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor.

The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS

Discussion Questions (DQ)

Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, include a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words.
Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source.
One or two sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words.
I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.

Weekly Participation

Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately.
In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies.
Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work).
Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.

APA Format and Writing Quality

Familiarize yourself with APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required).
Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation.
I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.

Use of Direct Quotes

I discourage overutilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Masters’ level and deduct points accordingly.
As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content.
It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.

ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS 

LopesWrite Policy

For assignments that need to be submitted to LopesWrite, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.
Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.
Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?
Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.

Late Policy

The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.
Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.
If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.
I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.
As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.

Communication

Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me:
Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.
Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.

Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100
Use the following coupon code :
NURSING10

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"