To what extent, if at all, is Bennett right to say that English privacy law does not yet protect against intrusion?
One scholar has recently suggested that the references to intrusion in PJS indicate that MPI now also covers intrusion [This view is wrong], PJS cannot be said to have opened up the MPI doctrine into anything even close to a full-blown intrusion tort. TDC Bennett, Triangulating Intrusion in Privacy Law (2019) 39(4) OJLS 751, 752 & 753 To what extent, if at all, is Bennett right to say that English privacy law does not yet protect against intrusion?
The paper should include references to work by: Thomas D C Bennett, Paul Wragg and Nicole Moreham amongst others. I have included some articles as additional materials for your reference and to aid with initial research
It should also include reference to the following case law:
PJS v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2016]
Tchenguiz v Imerman [2010]
Gulati v Mirror Group Newspapers Ltd [2015]
Richard v British Broardcasting Corporation [2018]
Mosley v News Group Newspapers [2008]
Goodwin v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2011]
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
