Critical Appraisal Paper, health and medicine homework help

3 attachments

Critical Appraisal Paper Description This critical appraisal paper will include the following components: 1. An introduction: – Thought provoking statement which highlights significance of the topic for nursing practice – Identification and definition of study variable(s)/phenomena within the research article – Description of how your paper will be organized – Purpose statement for your paper 2. Critical Analysis: – Critical appraisal as per table 17.1, Guide to an Overall Critique of a Quantitative Research Report OR table 17.2 Guide to an Overall Critique of a Qualitative Research Report (Loiselle & Profetto-McGrath, 2011, p. 359-361 or p.362-364). – Integration of literature to support position within critical analysis 3. A conclusion: – Restatement of the purpose for your paper – A concluding assessment of the research article’s strength/weaknesses with rationale – A summary of your key learnings from engaging in the critical appraisal process Papers must adhere to APA 6th edition guidelines and be no more than 8 pages in length (not inclusive of cover page or reference page). NURS 3092 – Fall 2016 NURS 3092 Nursing Research – Critical Appraisal Paper Rubric Paper Components Introduction (10%) Critical Appraisal (70%) F < 49 D = 54.95 C+ = 67.45 C = 62.45 B+ = 78.45 B = 75.45 B- = 71.95 Good introduction to the paper is provided. A+ = 95 A = 87.45 A- = 82.45 Excellent introduction of the paper is provided. No introduction to the paper provided. Minimal or less than satisfactory introduction to the paper is provided. Satisfactory introduction to the paper is provided. No thought provoking statement provided. Weak thought provoking statement provided. Satisfactory thought provoking statement provided. Good thought provoking statement provided. Excellent thought provoking provided. No purpose statement provided. Weak purpose statement identified. Satisfactory purpose statement identified. Good purpose statement identified. Excellent purpose statement identified. Study phenomena or dependent and independent variables are not defined. Study phenomena or dependent and independent variables are not defined. Satisfactory identification and definition of study phenomena or variables. Good identification and definition of study phenomena or variables. Excellent identification and definition of study phenomena or variables. No description of how the paper will be organized. Minimal or no description of how the paper will be organized. Satisfactory description of how the paper will be organized. Good description of how the paper will be organized. Excellent description of how the paper will be organized. Minimal or poor critical appraisal of the research study. Less than satisfactory critical appraisal of the research study. Critical Appraisal Paper, health and medicine homework help

Satisfactory critical appraisal of the research study. Good critical appraisal of the research study. Excellent critical appraisal of the research study. Minimal or no integration of the literature. Limited integration of the literature. Satisfactory integration of the literature. Good integration of the literature. Excellent integration of literature. Discussion is provided in a disorganized manner. Discussion is provided in a somewhat disorganized manner. Discussion is provided in a clear manner. Discussion is provided in a clear and effective manner. Discussion is provided in a clear, articulate, and effective manner. Sub Total Paper Components Conclusion (10%) APA 6th edition (10%) F < 49 D = 54.95 C+ = 67.45 C = 62.45 No restatement of purpose statement. Poor restatement of purpose statement. Satisfactory restatement of purpose statement. B+ = 78.45 B = 75.45 B- = 71.95 Good restatement of purpose statement. A+ = 95 A = 87.45 A- = 82.45 Excellent restatement of purpose statement. Minimal or no concluding assessment of the study’s strengths/weakness and rationale. Weak concluding assessment of the study’s strengths/weakness with minimal or no rationale. Satisfactory concluding assessment of the study’s strengths/weakness with rationale. Good concluding assessment of the study’s strengths/weakness with rationale. Excellent concluding assessment of the study’s strengths/weakness with rationale. Minimal or no summary of key learning from critical appraisal process. Less than satisfactory summary of key learning from critical appraisal process. Satisfactory summary of key learning from critical appraisal process. Good summary of key learning from critical appraisal process. Excellent summary of key learning from critical appraisal process. None; or references/citations given with numerous errors in format. References/citations given with some errors in format. References/citations given with a few errors in format (>3). References/citations given with a minor error in format (